Article published in:
Corpus Approaches to Language, Thought and Communication
Edited by Wei-lun Lu, Naděžda Kudrnáčová and Laura A. Janda
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17:1] 2019
► pp. 219242


Achard, M.
(2008) Teaching construal: Cognitive pedagogical grammar. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 432–455). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baicchi, A.
(2015) Construction learning as a complex adaptive system: Psycholinguistic evidence from L2 learners of English. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) The role of syntax and semantics in constructional priming: Experimental evidence from Italian university learners of English through a sentence-elicitation task. In S. de Knop & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied construction grammar (pp. 211–236). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bencini, G., & Goldberg, A.
(2000) The contribution of argument structure constructions to sentence meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 431, 640–651. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, K.
(1986) Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 181, 355–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F.
(2013) Cognitive Linguistic approaches to second language vocabulary: Assessment and integration. Language Teaching, 461, 208–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Knop, S., Boers, F., & de Rycker, A.
(Eds.) (2010) Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Rycker, A., & De Knop, S.
(2008) (Eds.). Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2009) Integrating Cognitive Linguistics and foreign language teaching: Historical background and new developments. Journal of Modern Languages, 19(1), 29–46.Google Scholar
Della Putta, P.
(2015) Discouraging constructional negative transfer: Theoretical aspects and classroom activities for Spanish-speaking students of L2 Italian. In K. Masuda, C. Arnett, & A. Labarca (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics and sociocultural theory (pp. 25–49). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Desmet, T., & Declercq, M.
(2006) Cross-linguistic priming of syntactic hierarchical configuration information. Journal of Memory and Language, 541, 610–632. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eddington, D., & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
(2010) Argument structure constructions and language processing. In S. de Knop, F. Boers, & A. de Rycher (Eds.), Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics (pp. 213–238). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Sagarra, N.
(2010) The bounds of adult language acquisition: Blocking and learned attention. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(4), 553–580. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Learned attention in adult language acquisition: a replication and generalization study and meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 331, 589–624. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans Davies, C.
(2018) On the relationship between interaction and language learning: A usage-based perspective grounded in interactional sociolinguistics. In A. Tyler, L. Ortega, M. Uno, & H. I. Park (Eds.), Usage-inspired L2 instruction (pp. 75–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, S., & Weld, H. P.
(1939) Perception. In E. G. Boring, S. H. Langfeld, H. P. Weld, et al. (Eds.), Introduction to psychology (pp. 411–438). New York: John Wiley. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, V.
(2003) The persistence of optional complementizer production. Journal of Memory and Language, 481, 379–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A.
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gries, S., & Wulff, S.
(2005) Do foreign language learners also have constructions?: Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 31, 182–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, R., Kolk, H., & Hiuskamp, P.
(1999) Priming word order in sentence production. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A1, 129–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, R., Pickering, M., & Veltkamp, E.
(2004) Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Psychological Science, 151, 409–414. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Healy, A., & Miller, G.
(1970) The verb as the main determinant of sentence meaning. Psychonomic Science, 201, 372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holme, R.
(2010) Construction grammars: Towards a pedagogical model. AILA Review, 231, 115–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Cognitive linguistics and the second language class. TESOL Quarterly, 461, 6–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, N.
(2015) Using cognitive linguistics and sociocultural theory for second language teaching. In K. Masuda, C. Arnett, & A. Labarca (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics and sociocultural theory (pp. 103–126). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kersten, A., & Billman, D.
(1997) Event category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 231, 638–658.Google Scholar
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T.
(1997) A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landauer, T., Foltz, P., & Laham, D.
(1998) An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 251, 259–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lashley, K.
(1951) The problem of serial order in behaviour. In L. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behaviour (pp. 112–136). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lassaline, M., & Murphy, G.
(1996) Induction and category coherence. Psychonomic Bullettin and Review, 3(1), 95–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, B.
(2008) Dative verbs: A crosslinguistics perspective. Lingvisticæ Investigationes, 311, 285–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liang, J.
(2002) How do Chinese EFL learners construct sentence meaning. M.A. thesis, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Libben, G., & Jarema, G.
(2002) Mental lexicon research in the new millennium. Brain and Language, 81(1–3), 2–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J.
(2009) Applying cognitive linguistics to second language learning and teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loebell, H., & Bock, K.
(2003) Structural priming across languages. Linguistics, 411, 791–794. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mateu, J., & Rigau, G.
(2010) Verb-particle constructions in Romance: A lexical-syntactic account. Probus, 221, 241–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martínez Vázquez, M.
(2004) Learning argument structure generalizations in a foreign language. VIAL, 11, 151–165.Google Scholar
Medin, D. L., Wattemaker, W., & Hampson, S.
(1987) Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction. Cognitive Psychology, 121, 242–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, D., & Schvaneveldt, R.
(1971) Facilitation in recognising pairs of words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 901, 227–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, G. L.
(2002) The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noora, S.
(2009) Iranian undergraduate non-English majors’ interpretation of English structures. GEMA, 9(2), 89–100.Google Scholar
Pedersen, J.
(2009a) The construction of macro-events: A typological perspective. In C. Butler & J. M. Arista (Eds.), Deconstructing constructions (pp. 25–62). Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Lexical and constructional organization of argument structure: A contrastive analysis. In J. Zlatev, M. Andrén, M. Johansson Falck, & C. Lundmark (Eds.), Studies in language and cognition (pp. 230–245). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Regehr, G., & Brooks, L. R.
(1995) Category organization in free classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 211, 347–363.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Mairal Usón, R.
(2008) Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning construction: An introduction to the lexical constructional model. Folia Linguistica, 42(2), 355–400.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Agustín Llach, M.
(2016) Cognitive Pedagogical Grammar and meaning construction in L2. In S. de Knop & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied construction grammar (pp. 151–184). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Segal, S. J., & Cofer, C. N.
(1960) The effect of recency and recall on word association. American Psychologist, 151, 451.Google Scholar
Sepassi, F., & Kamyab, P.
(2005) Iranian university students’ preference for verb centered vs. construction cues to sentence structure. The Asian EFL Journal, 7(5). Retrieved May 13, 2018, from http://​www​.asian​-efl​-journal​.com
Sinha, C. & Kuteva, T.
(1995) Distributed Spatial Semantics. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 181, 167–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storms, L. H.
(1958) Apparent backward association: a situational effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(4), 390–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
(2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Torre, E.
(2012) Symmetry and asymmetry in Italian caused-motion constructions: An Embodied Construction Grammar approach. Constructions, 11. Retrieved from: elanguage​.net​/journals​/index​.php​/constructions
Tulving, E., Schacter, D. L., & Stark, H. A.
(1982) Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8(4), 336–342.Google Scholar
Tyler, A., & Ortega, L.
(2018) Usage-inspired L2 instruction: An emergent, researched pedagogy. In A. Tyler, L. Ortega, M. Uno, & H. I. Park (Eds.), Usage-inspired L2 instruction (pp. 3–28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, J., & Rojo, A.
(2007) On the existence of constructions in foreign language learners. In R. Monroy & A. Sánchez (Eds.), 25 años de Lingüística en España (pp. 907–912). Murcia: Editum.Google Scholar
Washio, R.
(1997) Resultatives, compositionality and language variation. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 61, 1–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolter, B., & Yamashita, J.
(2018) Word frequency, collocational frequency, L1 congruency, and proficiency in L2 collocational processing: What accounts for L2 performance? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(2), 395–416. CrossrefGoogle Scholar