Cover not available
Article published In:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 17:2 (2019) ► pp.358–381

The salience of local schemas in a productive word-formation process

| University of Warsaw
| University of Warsaw

Word-formation rules of a generative type are insufficient to describe a mechanism which appears to be productive, on the one hand, but is also irregular in its productivity, on the other. Cognitive morphological accounts have stressed the importance of a wide range of more and less detailed schemas (rather than rules), sanctioning different kinds of novel formations. This article addresses the issue of morphological productivity in the context of the formation of abstract deverbal action nouns, also known as Nomina Actionis, with names of political states as derivational bases. The very number and variety of relevant lexicalized nominalizations as well as hapax legomena is impressive, which makes the phenomenon look productive. The data obtained from COCA and specialist literature show interesting tendencies and gaps in the system. Numerous nominalizations are motivated semantically and pragmatically and are sanctioned by local schemas.

Keywords: word-formation, nominalization, suffixation, productivity, (local) schema
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The morphological process in question
  • 3.The major source of language data: COCA
  • 4.The retrieval of language data
  • 5.Quantitative analysis
  • 6.Morphological productivity
  • 7.Local schemas
    • Finlandization
    • Hellenization
    • Russification
    • Germanize
  • 8.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 January 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00039.twa
References
Adams, V.
(2001) Complex words in English. Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Adedeji, A., Teriba, O., & Bugembe, P.
(Eds.) (2013) The challenge of African economic recovery and development. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ágh, A.
(1998) The politics of Central Europe. London & Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, M.
(1976) Word formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, H.
(1989) A corpus-based approach to morphological productivity: Statistical analysis and psycholinguistic interpretation. PhD dissertation. Amsterdam: Free University.Google Scholar
Baayen, H., & Renouf, A.
(1996) Chronicling the Times: Productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper. Language, 72 1, 69–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L.
(1988) Introducing linguistic morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Morphological productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, L., Lieber, R., & Plag, I.
(2013) The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bideleux, R., & Jeffries, I.
(2007) A history of Eastern Europe: Crisis and change, 2nd edition. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, M.
(2008) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). At: [URL]
East, R., & Pontin, J.
(2016) Revolution and change in Central and Eastern Europe, revised edition. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Gardner, L. C., & Young, M. B.
(Eds.) (2007) Iraq and the lessons of Vietnam. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, P.
(Ed.) (1991) Max Weber (2). Critical assessments. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hockett, Ch. F.
(1958) A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamusella, T.
(2009) The politics of language and nationalism in modern Central Europe. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Malicki, J., & Zasztowt, L.
(Eds.) (2009) East and West: History and contemporary state of Eastern studies. Warsaw: University of Warsaw.Google Scholar
Marchand, H.
(1969) The categories and types of present-day English word-formation. A synchronic-diachronic approach, 2nd completely revised and enlarged edition. München: C. H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H.
(1974) Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A.
(2012) Corpus Linguistics: Method, theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nowosielska, B.
(2017) Abstract nominalizations with names of states. A corpus-based study across written text genres. Unpublished M.A. thesis. Warsaw: University of Warsaw.Google Scholar
The Oxford English Dictionary
At: [URL]
Plag, I.
(1999) Morphological productivity. Structural constraints in English derivation. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Šabič, Z., & Drulák, P.
(Eds.) (2012) Regional and international relations of Central Europe. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snyder, T.
(2003) The reconstruction of nations: Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania, Belarus, 1569–1999. New Haven, CT & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Staniszkis, J.
(1991) The dynamics of the breakthrough in Eastern Europe: The Polish experience. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stroschein, S.
(2012) Ethnic struggle, coexistence, and democratization in Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sugar, P. F.
(1994) External and domestic roots of Eastern European nationalism. In P. F. Sugar & I. J. Lederer (Eds.), Nationalism in Eastern Europe (pp. 3–54). Seattle, WA & London: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Szymanek, B.
(1989) Introduction to morphological analysis. Warsaw: State Scientific Publishing House.Google Scholar
Twardzisz, P.
(2010) Patterns of English word-formation. Warsaw: University of Warsaw.Google Scholar
Zarycki, T.
(2014) Ideologies of Eastness in Central and Eastern Europe. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Twardzisz, Piotr
2020. Functional Plurality of Language in Contextualised Discourse, ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.