Review published In:
Review of Cognitive LinguisticsVol. 17:2 (2019) ► pp.537–543
Book review
M. Brdar. Metonymy and word-formation: Their interaction and complementation
Reviewed by
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The chapters of the book
- 3.The theoretical significance of the book
-
References
References
Bauer, L.
(2018) Conversion as metonymy. Word Structure,
11
(2), 175–184. 
Barcelona, A.
(2005) The multilevel operation of metonymy in grammar and discourse, with particular attention to metonymic chains. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & S. Peña Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (Cognitive Linguistics Research 32) (pp. 313–352). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bierwiaczonek, B.
(2013) Metonymy in language, thought and brain. Sheffield: Equinox.
Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabó, R.
(2014) Where does metonymy begin? Some comments on Janda (2011). Cognitive Linguistics,
25
(2), 313–340.
Dirven, R.
(1999) Conversion as conceptual conversion of event schemata. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (Human Cognitive Processing 4) (pp. 275–287). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Janda, L. A.
(2011) Metonymy in word-formation. Cognitive Linguistics,
22
1, 359–392.
(2014) Metonymy and word-formation revisited. Cognitive Linguistics,
25
(2), 341–349.
Koch, P.
(2001a) Lexical typology from a cognitive and linguistic point of view. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher, & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook. Vol.
2
1 (pp. 1142–1178). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.