“Hi, Mr. President!”
Fictive interaction blends as a unifying rhetorical strategy in satire
Paula Fonseca | Polytechnic Institute of Viseu
Esther Pascual | Zhejiang University
Todd Oakley | Case Western Reserve University
What makes The Daily Show with Jon Stewart so successful as social and political satire? Rhetorical theorists and critics have identified several mechanisms for satisfying the show’s satiric and parodic aim, which include parodic polyglossia, contextual clash, and satirical specificity (Waisanen, 2009). We present a unified account of meaning construction that encompasses these three mechanisms within the framework of blended fictive interaction (Pascual, 2002, 2008ab). Satire results from emergent effects of different conceptual configurations that have to be in place to integrate a pastiche of speech whose provenance originates in different and diverse contexts and genres. The integration of contradictory, conceptually disjointed pieces of discourse under the governing structure of the conversation frame accounts for the show’s most conspicuous satirical moments. These imagined interactions highlight facets of the real world for critical commentary. The thick description of an influential Daily Show segment deepens our understanding of contemporary political satire.
Keywords: fictive interaction networks, late-night satirical political entertainment television shows, parodic polyglossia, satirical specificity, contextual clash
Published online: 17 August 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00056.fon
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00056.fon
References
References
Amarasingam, A.
Andersen, P.
Armstrong, J. K.
(2015, August 6). How Jon Stewart changed the world. Retrieved May 20, 2017, from http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20150806-how-jon-stewart-changed-the-world
Baker, P.
(2012, October 17). For the President, punch, punch, another punch. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/17/us/politics/in-second-debate-obama-strikes-back.html
Baum, M. A.
Baum, M. A., & Jamison, A. S.
Baumgartner, J., & Morris, J. S.
[ p. 208 ]
Baym, G.
Becker, A. B., Xenos, M. A., & Waisanen, D. J.
Blake, A.
(2012, October 4). What Google can tell us about the first debate – in 4 charts. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2012/10/04/what-google-tells-us-about-the-first-debate-in-four-graphics/
Brandt, L.
Brandt, L., & Pascual, E.
Brewer, P. R., & Marquardt, E.
Brône, G., Feyaerts, K., & Veale, T.
Cao, X.
CBS Interactive
(2012, October 3). CBS news instant poll: Romney wins first presidential debate. CBS News. CBS. Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/cbs-news-instant-poll-romney-wins-first-presidential-debate/
Cienki, A., & Giansante, G.
CNN Politics
(2012, October 3). CNN Poll: Most watchers say Romney debate winner. Retrieved from http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/10/03/cnn-poll-romney-wins-debate-by-big-margin/
Coulson, S.
(2001) What’s so funny?: Conceptual integration in humorous examples. Retrieved from http://www.cogsci.ucsd.edu/~coulson/funstuff/funny.html
Coulson, S., & Pascual, E.
Coulson, S., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M.
[ p. 209 ]
CPD
(2012) 2012 Debates. Retrieved May 28, 2018, from http://www.debates.org/index.php?page=2012-debates
D’Addario, D.
(2015) Jon Stewart helped launch the careers of these Daily Show correspondents. Time Magazine. Retrieved from http://time.com/3704300/jon-stewart-daily-show-retiring-correspondents/
Davis, C. J., Bowers, J. S., & Memon, A.
Džanić, N., & Berberoviü, S.
Fauconnier, G.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
Feldman, L.
Fillmore, C. J.
Finkelstein, S.
(2015, July 30). Jon Stewart, superboss. Harvard Business Reveiw. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/07/jon-stewart-superboss
Fonseca, P.
Goffman, E.
Gray, J., Jones, J. P., & Thompson, E.
Jefferson, G.
[ p. 210 ]
Jones, J.
Knappenberger, B.
(2014, June 3). Bloomberg news. Jon Stewart’s story: How the fake newsman won over America. Bloomberg. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTutwy3wNGc
Lakoff, G.
Lichter, S. R.
Liddell, S.
Marín-Arrese, J.
(2003) Humour as ideological struggle: The view from Cognitive Linguistics. Presented at the Cognitive Linguistics Approaches to Humour, University of La Rioja, Spain. Retrieved from http://wwwling.arts.kuleuven.ac.be/iclc../papers/juanamarinarrese.pdf
Oakley, T.
Oakley, T., & Pascual, E.
Parrill, F.
Pascual, E.
Popa, D. E.
Prior, M.
Sanders, T., Sanders, J., & Sweetser, E.
Talmy, L.
Thussu, D. K.
Turner, M.
Waisanen, D. J.
Warner, J.
Xenos, M. A., & Becker, A. B.
Xiang, M.
Young, D. G.
Zinoman, J.
[ p. 212 ]
(2014, April 16). True king of late night? He might raise eyebrows image. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/17/arts/television/jon-stewarts-big-role-in-developing-stars.html