Review published in:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 18:1 (2020) ► pp. 275281


Blank, A.
(2003) Words and concepts in time: Towards diachronic cognitive onomasiology. In R. Eckardt, K. von Heusinger & Ch. Schwarze (Eds.), Words in time: Diachronic semantics from different points of view (pp. 37–65). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iacobini, C.
(2012) Grammaticalization and innovation in the encoding of motion events. Folia Linguistica, 46, 359–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Particle-verbs in Romance. In P. O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen & F. Rainer (Eds.), Word-formation. An international handbook of the languages of Europe (pp. 626–658). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koch, P.
(2000a) Pour une approche cognitive du changement sémantique lexical: Aspect onomasiologique. In the Société de Linguistique de Paris (Ed.), Théories contemporaines du changement sémantique (pp. 75–95). Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
(2000b) Indirizzi cognitivi per una tipologia lessicale dell’italiano. Italienische Studien, 21, 99–117.Google Scholar
(2004) Diachronic onomasiology and semantic reconstruction. In W. Mihatsch & R. Steinberg (Eds.), Lexical data and universals of semantic change (pp. 79–106). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Koch, P., & Marzo, D.
(2007) A two-dimensional approach to the study of motivation in lexical typology and its first application to French high-frequency vocabulary. Studies in Language, 31(2), 259–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, A.
(2006) The semantic structure of motion verbs in French: Typological perspectives. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pountain, Ch. J.
(2000) Pragmatic factors in the evolution of the Romance reflexive (with special reference to Spanish). Hispanic Research Journal, 1(1), 5–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pourcel, S., & Kopecka, A.
(2005) Motion expression in French: Typological diversity. Durham & Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics, 11, 139–153.Google Scholar
Simone, R.
(2008) Verbi sintagmatici come categoria e come costruzione. In M. Cini (Ed.), I verbi sintagmatici in italiano e nelle varietà dialettali: Stato dell’arte e prospettive di ricerca. Atti delle giornate di studio (Torino, 19–20 febbraio 2007) (pp. 13–30). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Stefenelli, A.
(1992) Das Schicksal des lateinischen Wortschatzes in den romanischen Sprachen. Passau: Richard Rothe.Google Scholar
[ p. 281 ]
Stolova, N. I.
(2008) From satellite-framed Latin to verb-framed Romance: Late Latin as an intermediate stage. In R. Wright (Ed.), Latin vulgaire – latin tardif VIII: Actes du VIIIe Colloque International sur le Latin Vulgaire et Tardif, Oxford, 6–9 septembre 2006 (pp. 253–262). Hildesheim: Georg Olms; Zürich: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
(2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
(1985) On regularity in semantic change. Journal of Literary Semantics: An international review, 14(3), 155–173.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Dascher, R. B.
(2002) Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
(2013) Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar