Review published In:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 18:1 (2020) ► pp.282287


(2011) The Holy Bible (New International Version). Worldwide: Biblica., Inc.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J.
(2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D.
(1964) A liturgical language in a linguistic perspective. New Blackfriars, 46(534), 148–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1965) Linguistics, language and religion. London: Burns and Oates.Google Scholar
Goddard, C.
(2011) Semantic analysis: A practical introduction (revised 2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Masson, R.
(2014) Without metaphor, no saving God: Theology after Cognitive Linguistics. Leuven: Peeters Publishers.Google Scholar
Sanders, J.
(2016) Theology in the flesh: How embodiment and culture shape the way we think about truth, morality, and God. Minneapolis: Fortress Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Introduction to the topical issue “Cognitive Linguistics and theology”. Open Theology, 41, 541–544. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soskice, J.
(1985) Metaphor and religious language. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Unger, C.
(2017) Towards a Relevance Theory account of allegory. In A. Piskorska & E. Walaszewska (Eds.), Applications of relevance theory: From discourse to morphemes (pp. 152–174). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
(1992) Semantics, culture and cognition: Universal human concepts in culture-specific configurations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar