Review published in:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 18:1 (2020) ► pp. 282287


(2011) The Holy Bible (New International Version). Worldwide: Biblica., Inc.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J.
(2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D.
(1964) A liturgical language in a linguistic perspective. New Blackfriars, 46(534), 148–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1965) Linguistics, language and religion. London: Burns and Oates.Google Scholar
Goddard, C.
(2011) Semantic analysis: A practical introduction (revised 2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Masson, R.
(2014) Without metaphor, no saving God: Theology after Cognitive Linguistics. Leuven: Peeters Publishers.Google Scholar
Sanders, J.
(2016) Theology in the flesh: How embodiment and culture shape the way we think about truth, morality, and God. Minneapolis: Fortress Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Introduction to the topical issue “Cognitive Linguistics and theology”. Open Theology, 4, 541–544. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Soskice, J.
(1985) Metaphor and religious language. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Unger, C.
(2017) Towards a Relevance Theory account of allegory. In A. Piskorska & E. Walaszewska (Eds.), Applications of relevance theory: From discourse to morphemes (pp. 152–174). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
(1992) Semantics, culture and cognition: Universal human concepts in culture-specific configurations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar