Review published in:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 18:2 (2020) ► pp. 590–595
Book review

D. Shu, H. Zhang & L. Zhang (Eds.). Cognitive Linguistics and the study of Chinese
Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2019. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1075​/hcp​.67

Reviewed by
| Sichuan International Studies University
Published online: 04 December 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00072.wu
References
Boroditsky, L., Fuhrman, O., & McCormick, K.
(2011) Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently?. Cognition, 118(1), 123–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Divjak, D., Levshina, N., & Klavan, J.
(2016) Cognitive Linguistics: Looking back, looking forward. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(4), 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janda, L. A.
(2013) Quantitative methods in Cognitive Linguistics. In L. A. Janda (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: The quantitative turn (pp. 1–32). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) Quantitative perspectives in Cognitive Linguistics: An introduction. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 17(1), 7–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ji, Y., & Hohenstein, J.
(2018) English and Chinese children’s motion event similarity judgments. Cognitive Linguistics, 29(1), 45–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lu, W.
(2019) Time, tense and viewpoint shift across languages: A multiple-parallel-text approach to “tense shifting” in a tenseless language. Cognitive Linguistics, 30(2), 377–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wen, X.
(2019) Sociocognitive linguistics based on social cognition. Modern Foreign Language, 42(3), 293–305.Google Scholar