Review published In:
Review of Cognitive LinguisticsVol. 18:2 (2020) ► pp.590–595
Book review
. Cognitive Linguistics and the study of Chinese. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.67
Reviewed by
References (7)
Boroditsky, L., Fuhrman, O., & McCormick, K. (2011). Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently?. Cognition, 118(1), 123–129. 
Divjak, D., Levshina, N., & Klavan, J. (2016). Cognitive Linguistics: Looking back, looking forward. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(4), 1–17.
Janda, L. A. (2013). Quantitative methods in Cognitive Linguistics. In L. A. Janda (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: The quantitative turn (pp. 1–32). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
(2019). Quantitative perspectives in Cognitive Linguistics: An introduction. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 17(1), 7–28.
Ji, Y., & Hohenstein, J. (2018). English and Chinese children’s motion event similarity judgments. Cognitive Linguistics, 29(1), 45–76.
Lu, W. (2019). Time, tense and viewpoint shift across languages: A multiple-parallel-text approach to “tense shifting” in a tenseless language. Cognitive Linguistics, 30(2), 377–397.
Wen, X. (2019). Sociocognitive linguistics based on social cognition. Modern Foreign Language, 42(3), 293–305.