Article published in:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 19:1 (2021) ► pp. 125
References
Barcelona, A.
(2000) On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 31–58). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brdar, M., & Brdar Szabó, R.
(2007) When Zidane is not simply Zidane, and Bill Gates is not just Bill Gates: Or, some thoughts on online construction of metaphtonymic meanings of proper names. In G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (pp. 125–142). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.
(2003) The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphor and metonymy. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 161–206). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, A.
(2004) Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuyckens, H., & Zawada, B. E.
(2001) Polysemy in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, V., & Green, M.
(2006) Cognitive Linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(1999) Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world. In R. W. Gibbs, & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 145–166). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glushko, R. J., Maglio, P. P., Matlock, T., & Barsalou, L. W.
(2008) Categorization in the wild. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(4), 129–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goossens, L.
(2003) Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 349–378). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grady, J.
(1997a) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphor and primary scenes. Doctoral dissertation. University of California at Berkeley. http://​escholarship​.org​/uc​/item​/3g9427m2
(1997b)  theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), 267–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs, & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1595–1614. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y.-M.
(2016) Fenlei biaojie huang-di-nei-jing hanqi ciyu xitong (Analysis of the words and phrases of qi in the HDIC by the classified chart). Liyun Yuyan Xuekan (Liyun Linguistic Journal), (2), 145–159.Google Scholar
Huang, Z.-J.
(2001) Zhongyi “qi” ming kaobian (Qi terminology in TCM). Zhongguo Zhongyi Jichu Yixue Zazhi (Chinese Journal of Basic Medicine in TCM), (10), 65–66.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.
(1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(1999) Metaphor: Does it constitute or reflect cultural models? In R. W. Gibbs, & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 167–188). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2013) The metaphor-metonymy relationship: Correlation metaphors are based on metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(2), 75–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G.
(1998) Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z.
(1987) The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp.195–221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
(1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, C.-S.
(2006) “Qi” gainian jige cengci yiyi de fenshu (Differentiation of the meanings at several levels of qi concept). Zhexue Yanjiu (Philosophy Study), (9), 34–41; 128.Google Scholar
Li, X.-Q., Shen, X.-D., Zhao, D., & Xu, F.
(2016) Guanyu zhongyi “qi” linian de jidian sikao (Reflections on qi concept in TCM). Zhongyiyao Wenhua (Chinese Medical Culture), 11(3), 54–59.Google Scholar
Li, Z.-G.
(2011) Jianming hanying huang-di-nei-jing cidian (A concise Chinese-English dictionary of Yellow Emperor’s canon of medicine). Beijing: People’s Health Publishing House.Google Scholar
Liu, C.-L.
(1978) Lun huang-di-nei-jing zhong de “qi” (On qi in HDIC). Zhexue Yanjiu (Philosophy Study), (7), 57–64.Google Scholar
(2017a) “Qi” de shizhi shi shenme (What is the essence of qi ). Zhongguo Zhongyiyao Bao (China News of TCM) (3rd ed.).Google Scholar
(2017b) “Qi” yu zhongyi de renshen guan (Relationship between qi and human body). Zhongguo Zhongyiyao Bao (China News of TCM) (3rd ed.).Google Scholar
Liu, C.-L., & Zhang, R.-Z.
(2005) Zhongguo zhexue “qi” fanchou de xiandai renshi (Modern cognition of qi in China’s philosophy). Taiyuan Shifan Xueyuan Xuebao (Shehui Kexue Ban) (Journal of Taiyuan Teachers College (Social Science Ed.)), 4(1), 6–11.Google Scholar
Liu, Y.-L., Wang, X.-X., & Han, J.-X.
(2014) Zhongyi “qi” xueshuo yanjiu 60 nian (Studies on qi theory of TCM in past sixty years). Liaoning Zhongyi Zazhi (Liaoning Journal of TCM), 41(11), 2299–2303.Google Scholar
Liu, Z., & Lu, W.-Z.
(2013) Huang-di-nei-jing zhong de gainian yinyu (Conceptual metaphors in HDIC). Qilu Shifan Xueyuan Xuebao (Journal of Qilu Normal University), 28(1), 123–126.Google Scholar
Liu, Z.-H., Zhang, Y.-P., & Yang, W.
(2007) Lun neijing zhong jing zi yuanliu jiqi hanyi (On the origin, development and connotation of jing (essence) in HDIC). Zhongguo Zhongyi Jichu Yixue Zazhi (Chinese Journal of Basic Medicine in TCM), (10), 731–732.Google Scholar
Lou, K.-Q.
(2018) Huangdi Neijing zhong “qi”, “xue”, “shen” fanchou de yuyan wenhua lunxi (An analysis of language and culture in the category of “qi”, “blood” and “spirit” in HDIC). Thesis. Xiamen University.Google Scholar
Musolff, A.
(2015) Metaphor interpretation and cultural linguistics. Language and Semiotic Studies, 1(3), 35–51.Google Scholar
(2017) Metaphor and cultural cognition. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nerlich, B., Todd, Z., Herman, V., & Clark, D. D.
(2003) Polysemy: Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radden, G.
(2002) How metonymic are metaphors? In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 407–433). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z.
(1999) Towards a theory of metonymy. In K-U. Pather & G. Radden (Eds.) Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–59). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ren, X.-L.
(2008) Huang-di-nei-jing jiangou zhongyiyao lilun de jiben fanchou – “qi” (“jingqi”) (The basic category employed to construct the TCM theory in HDIC – qi (essence qi)). Zhonghua Zhongyiyao Zazhi (China Journal of TCM and Pharmacy), (1), 53–55.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
(2020) Understanding figures of speech: Dependency relations and organizational patterns. Language & Communication, 711, 16–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, E.
(1949) Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture and personality. (Edited by D. G. Mandelbaum.) Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sharifian, F.
(2011) Cultural conceptualizations and language: Theoretical framework and applications. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Cultural linguistics. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 473–492). London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017a) Cultural linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017b) Advances in cultural linguistics. Singapore: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sun, G.-R.
(1997) Jingqi de gainian, yuanliu ji jiegou qianshi (The concept, origin and structure of essence qi ). Shandong Zhongyiyao Daxue Xuebao (Journal of Shandong University of TCM), 81(5), 23–27.Google Scholar
(1998) Neijing zhong “jing”, “jingqi” de hanyi ji jige xiangguan wenti (The connotations and relevant issues of essence and essence qi in HDIC). Shandong Zhongyiyao Daxue Xuebao (Journal of Shandong University of TCM), (5), 10–12.Google Scholar
(2000) Neijing zhong “qi” de hanyi bianxi (Differentiation of the connotations of qi in HDIC). Zhejiang Zhongyi Xueyuan Xuebao (Journal of Zhejiang College of TCM), (5), 15–16.Google Scholar
Sun, J., Li, Q.-F., & Wang, K.-G.
(2017) Qiantan huang-di-nei-jing zhong de “qi” he “qihua” ( Qi and qi transformation in HDIC). Zhejiang Zhongyiyao Daxue Xuebao (Journal of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University), 41(4), 274–277.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.
(1995) Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
The dictionary editorial office of language research institution of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
(2016) Xiandai hanyu cidian (Modern Chinese dictionary). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
The editorial committee of Key concepts in Chinese thought and culture
(2017) Zhonghua sixiang wenhua shuyu (Key concepts in Chinese thought and culture Vol.1). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching & Research Press.Google Scholar
Tuggy, D.
(1999) Linguistic evidence for polysemy in the mind: A response to William Croft and Dominiek Sandra. Cognitive Linguistics, 10(4), 343–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A., & Evans, V.
(2003) The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X.-P.
(2015) Lun zhongyi “qi” gainian de neihan (Connotation of qi concept in TCM). Shaanxi Zhongyi Xueyuan Xuebao (Journal of Shaanxi College of TCM), 38(2), 1–5.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
(1997) Understanding cultures through their key words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Health Organization
(2007) WHO international standard terminologies on traditional medicine in the western Pacific Ocean. World Health Organization Western Pacific Region.Google Scholar
Wu, J.-Y., Zhang, J.-L., Wang, J., & He, W.-B.
(2015) Huang-di-nei-jing zhi “qi” yu zhongyixue “yuan zhengtiguan” ( Qi in HDIC and the “meta-holistic view” in TCM). Zhongyi Zazhi (Journal of TCM), 56(2), 91–94.Google Scholar
Yang, M.-Y., & Wang, Y.-T.
(2017) Jiyu shikong xulie renzhi de xianqin shiqi zhongyi “qi” gainian yixiangxing qianxi (Intentional analysis of qi concept in TCM during pre-Qin period based on the cognition of spatiotemporal sequence). Zhonghua Zhongyiyao Zazhi (China Journal of TCM and Pharmacy), 32(6), 2491–2493.Google Scholar
Yu, C.
(2002) Yimen falv (Principle and prohibition for medical profession). Beijing: China Ancient Book Publishing House.Google Scholar
Zhang, H.-S.
(2013) Jieshi zhongyi xueshuo zhong “qi” gainian de benzhi (Revelation of the essence of qi concept in TCM). Guangming Zhongyi (Guangming Journal of Chinese Medicine), 28(12), 2470–2481.Google Scholar
Zhang, W.-H.
(2010) Cong yuyanxue de jiaodu qianxi zhongyi “qi” gainian de shengcheng (Linguistic analysis of the formation of qi concept). Yunnan Zhongyi Xueyuan Xuebao (Journal of Yunnan University of TCM), 33(3), 7–8; 121.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Cui, Z.
(2020) Wenhua fanyiguan xia “Jingui Yaolue” zhong “qi” wenhua fuzai ci yingyi (Cultural-loaded words containing qi in the English versions of Jingui Yaolue from the perspective of cultural translation theory). Huabei Ligong Daxue Xuebao (Shehui Kexue Ban) (Journal of North China University of Science and Technology (Social Science Ed.)), 20(2), 111–115.Google Scholar
Zhao, L.-M.
(2013) Huang-di-nei-jing yici duoyi de renzhi yanjiu (A cognitive research on polysemy in Yellow Emperor’s canon of medicine). Doctoral dissertation. Shanghai International Studies University.Google Scholar