Article published in:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 19:1 (2021) ► pp. 5179
Austin, J. L.
(1962) How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cutrer, M. L.
(1994) Time and Tense in Narrative and in Everyday Language. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Dancygier, B. & Sweetser, E.
(1997)  Then in conditionals. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(2), 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Constructions with if, since, and because: Causality, epistemic stance, and clause order. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & B. Kortmann (Eds.), Cause, concession, contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives (pp. 111–142). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E.
(2005) Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, D. R.
(1985) On recent analyses of the semantics of control. Linguistics and Philosophy, 81, 291–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G.
(1994) Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Mappings in thought and language. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Lee-Goldman, R., & Rhodes, R.
(2012) The FrameNet constructicon. In I. A. Sag & H. C. Boas (Eds.). Sign-based Construction Grammar (pp. 313–363). Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kwon, I.
(2012) The Korean evidential marker -te revisited: Its semantic constraints and distancing effects in Mental spaces theory. Constructions and Frames, 4(2), 152–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1990) Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 5–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1991) Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Larson, R. K.
(1991) Promise and the theory of control. Linguistic Inquiry, 22(1), 103–139Google Scholar
Lyons, J.
(1981) Language and linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Galera, A.
(2014) Cognitive modeling: A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sanders, T., Sanders, J., & Sweetser, E.
(2009) Causality, cognition and communication: A mental space analysis of subjectivity in causal connectives. In T. Sanders & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Causal categories in discourse and cognition (pp. 19–60). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Responsible subjects and discourse causality: How mental spaces and perspective help identifying subjectivity in Dutch backward causal connectives. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(2), 191–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R.
(1989) How performatives work. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12(5), 535–558. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E.
(2000) Blended spaces and performativity. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(3), 305–333.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
(1993) The conflict promises/threatens to escalate into war. In Proceedings of the 19th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 19 (pp. 348–358).Google Scholar
(1996) Subjectification and the development of epistemic meaning: The case of promise and threaten . In T. Swan & O. J. Westvik (Eds.), Modality in Germanic languages: Historical and comparative perspectives (pp. 185–210). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Verhagen, A.
(1996) Sequential conceptualization and linear order. In E. H. Casad (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The expansion of a new paradigm in linguistics (pp. 793–817). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2000) “The girl that promised to become something”: An exploration into diachronic subjectification in Dutch. In T. F. Shannon & J. P. Snapper (Eds.), The Berkeley conference on Dutch linguistics 1997 (pp. 197–208). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar