Cover not available
Review published In:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 19:1 (2021) ► pp.266–271
Book review

Z. Kövecses. Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. 196 pp.

Reviewed by
| Corvinus University of Budapest
Published online: 28 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00084.ben
References
Benczes, R.
(2011) Putting the notion of “domain” back into metonymy: Evidence from compounds. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Defining metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 197–215). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, L.
(2001) Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conception of time. Cognitive Psychology, 431, 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L., & Deignan, A.
(2006) The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 671–690. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maule, J., Stratton, P., & Stanley, N.
(2009) The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 24(2), 63–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dirven, R., & Pörings, R.
(Eds.) (2002) Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(Ed.) (2008) The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) The embodied and discourse views of metaphor: Why these are not so different and how they can be brought closer together. In: B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse (pp. 319–335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2002/2010) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Second edition. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1990) The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 39–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Musolff, A.
2016 Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Musolff, A., & Zinken, J.
(Eds.) (2009) Metaphor and discourse. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
(1998) On the nature of blending as a cognitive phenomenon. Journal of Pragmatics, 301, 259–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Pérez, L.
(2011) The contemporary theory of metaphor: Myths, developments and challenges. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(3), 161–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Šarić, L., & Stanojević, M.-M.
(Eds.) (2019) Metaphor, nation and discourse. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E.
(2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Semino, E., Demjén, Z., & Demmen, J.
(2018) An integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, discourse, and practice, with an application to metaphors for cancer. Applied Linguistics, 39(5), 625–645.Google Scholar