Roles of verb and construction cues
Cross-language comparisons between English and Korean sentence comprehension
This study investigates how speakers of English and Korean, two typologically distinct languages, derive information from a verb and a construction to achieve sentence comprehension. In a sentence-sorting task, we manipulated verb semantics (real versus nonce) in each language. The results showed that participants from both languages were less inclined to sort sentences by a verb cue when the lexical-semantic information about a verb was obscured (i.e., nonce verb). In addition, the Korean-speaking participants were less likely affected by the verb semantics conditions than the English-speaking participants. These findings suggest the role of an argument structure construction in sentence comprehension as a co-contributor of sentence meaning, supporting the constructionist approach. The findings also imply language-specific mechanisms of sentence comprehension, contingent upon the varied impact of a verb on sentence meaning in English and Korean.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1Lexical approach
- 2.2Constructionist approach
- 2.3Typological differences between English and Korean
- 3.Present study
- 4.Methods
- 4.1Participants
- 4.2Stimuli
- 4.3Procedure
- 4.4Data coding and analysis
- 4.5Predictions
- 5.Results
- 6.Discussion
- Note
-
References
References
Ahrens, K. V.
(
1995)
The mental representation of verbs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at San Diego.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Allen, K., Pereira, F., Botvinick, M., & Goldberg, A. E.
(
2012)
Distinguishing grammatical constructions with fMRI pattern analysis.
Brain and Language, 1231, 174–182.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Altmann, G. T.
(
1999)
Thematic role assignment in context.
Journal of Memory and Language, 411, 124–145.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Altmann, G. T., & Kamide, Y.
(
1999)
Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference.
Cognition, 731, 247–264.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Altmann, G. T., & Kamide, Y.
(
2007)
The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing.
Journal of Memory and Language, 571, 502–518.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., & Young, C. R.
(
2008)
The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children’s and adults’ graded judgments of argument-structure overgeneralization errors.
Cognition, 1061, 87–129.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R. H.
(
2008)
Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baicchi, A.
(
2013)
The ontological status of constructions in the mind of Italian university learners of English: Psycholinguistic evidence from a sentence-sorting experiment. In
L. D. Michele (Ed.),
Regenerating Community, Territory, Voices (pp. 12–24). Napoli: Liguori.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barðdal, J., Kristoffersen, K. E., & Sveen, A.
(
2011)
West Scandinavian ditransitives as a family of constructions: With a special attention to the Norwegian ‘V-REFL-NP’ construction.
Linguistics, 491, 53–104.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.
(
2013)
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.
Journal of Memory and Language, 681, 255–278.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bencini, G. M., & Goldberg, A. E.
(
2000)
The contribution of argument structure constructions to sentence meaning.
Journal of Memory and Language, 431, 640–651.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boas, H. C., & Ziem, A.
(
2018)
Constructional approaches to syntactic structures in German. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bock, J. K., & Levelt, W. J. M.
(
1994)
Language production: Grammatical encoding. In
M. Gernsbacher (Ed.),
Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 945–984). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Casenhiser, D., & Goldberg, A. E.
(
2005)
Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning.
Developmental Science, 81, 500–508.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Childers, J. B., & Paik, J. H.
(
2009)
Korean-and English-speaking children use cross-situational information to learn novel predicate terms.
Journal of Child Language, 361, 201–224.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Choi, Y., & Trueswell, J. C.
(
2010)
Children’s (in)ability to recover from garden paths in a verb-final language: Evidence for developing control in sentence processing.
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1061, 41–61.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N.
(
1965)
Aspects and the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Knop, S., & Mollica, F.
(
2016)
A construction-based study of German ditransitive phraseologisms for language pedagogy. In
S. De Knop &
G. Gilquin (Eds.),
Applied construction grammar (pp. 53–88). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dryer, M.
(
2013)
Order of subject, object and verb. In
M. Haspelmath,
M. Dryer,
D. Gil &
B. Comrie (Eds.),
The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Retrieved at
[URL] on 12-JUN-2020.
Du Bois, J. W.
(
2003)
Argument structure. In
J. W. Du Bois,
L. E. Kumpf, &
W. J. Ashby (Eds.),
Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function (pp. 11–60). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Everitt, B. S., Landau, S., Leese, M., & Stahl, D.
(
2011)
Cluster Analysis (5th edition). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fisher, C., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L. R.
(
1991)
On the semantic content of subcategorization frames.
Cognitive Psychology, 231, 331–392.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frenck-Mestre, C., Kim, S. K., Choo, H., Ghio, A., Herschensohn, J., & Koh, S.
(
2019)
Look and listen! The online processing of Korean case by native and non-native speakers.
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(3), 385–404.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Friederici, A. D., & Weissenborn, J.
(
2007)
Mapping sentence form onto meaning: The syntax–semantic interface.
Brain Research, 11461, 50–58.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garnsey, S. M., Pearlmuttter, N. J., Myers, E., & Lotocky, M. A.
(
1997)
The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences.
Journal of Memory and Language, 371, 58–93.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. E.
(
1995)
Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. E.
(
2006)
Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. E.
(
2013a)
Argument structure constructions versus lexical rules or derivational verb templates.
Mind and Language, 281, 435–465.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. E.
(
2013b)
Constructionist approach. In
G. Trousdale &
T. Hoffmann (Eds.),
Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 15–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. E.
(
2019)
Explain me this. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldwater, M. B., & Markman, A. B.
(
2009)
Constructional sources of implicit agents in sentence comprehension.
Cognitive Linguistics, 201, 675–702.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gries, S. T., & Wulff, S.
Hawkins, J. A.
(
2014)
Cross-linguistic variation and efficiency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Healy, A., & Miller, G.
(
1970)
The verb as the main determinant of sentence meaning.
Psychonomic Science, 201, 372.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hwang, H., & Kaiser, E.
(
2014)
The role of the verb in grammatical function assignment in English and Korean.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 401, 1363–1376.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, R.
(
1975)
Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon.
Language, 511, 639–671.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, M. A., & Goldberg, A. E.
(
2013)
Evidence for automatic accessing of constructional meaning: Jabberwocky sentences prime associated verbs.
Language and Cognitive Processes, 281, 1439–1452.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kako, E.
(
2006)
Thematic role properties of subjects and objects.
Cognition, 1011, 1–42.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kako, E., & Wagner, L.
(
2001)
The semantics of syntactic structures.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 51, 102–108.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T., & Haywood, S. L.
(
2003)
The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements.
Journal of Memory and Language, 491, 133–156.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaschak, M. P., & Glenberg, A. M.
(
2000)
Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension.
Journal of Memory and Language, 431, 508–529.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, H., & Grüter, T.
(
2019)
Cross-linguistic activation of implicit causality biases in Korean learners of English.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(3), 441–455.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, H., & Rah, Y.
(
2016)
Effects of verb semantics and proficiency in second language use of constructional knowledge.
The Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 716–731.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, H., & Rah, Y.
(
2019)
Constructional processing in a second language: The role of constructional knowledge in verb-construction integration.
Language Learning, 69(4), 1022–1056.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, H., Shin, G-H., & Hwang, H.
2020).
Cross-linguistic influence in the second language integration of verb and construction.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 421, 825–847.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Kim, J-B.
(
2016)
The syntactic structures of Korean: A construction grammar perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, J-B., & Choi, I.
(
2004)
The Korean case system: A unified, constraint-based approach.
Language Research, 40(4), 885–921.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, K.
(
2016)
A contrastive analysis of English and Korean news headlines.
Studies in Linguistics, 411, 25–48.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, Y.
(
1999)
The effects of case marking information on Korean sentence processing.
Language and Cognitive Processes, 141, 687–714.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M.
(
1995)
Unaccusativity in the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liang, J.
(
2002)
Sentence comprehension by Chinese learners of English: Verb-centered or construction-based. Unpublished master’s thesis, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangdong.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S.
(
1994)
The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution.
Psychological Review, 1011, 676–703.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mantel, N.
(
1967)
The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach.
Cancer Research, 271, 209–220.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McRae, K., Ferretti, T. R., & Amyote, L.
(
1997)
Thematic roles as verb-specific concepts.
Language and Cognitive Processes, 121, 137–176.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miyamoto, E. T.
(
2002)
Case markers as clause boundary inducers in Japanese.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 311, 307–347.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nolan, B.
(
2013)
Constructions as grammatical objects. In
B. Nolan &
E. Diedrichsen (Eds.),
Linking constructions into functional linguistics: The role of constructions in grammar (pp. 143–178). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perek, F.
(
2012)
Alternation-based generalizations are stored in the mental grammar: Evidence from a sorting task experiment.
Cognitive Linguistics, 231, 601–635.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. S.
(
2008)
Structural priming: A critical review.
Psychological Bulletin, 1341, 427–459.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, S.
(
1989)
Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
R Core Team
(
2016)
R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL
[URL]
Robenalt, C., & Goldberg, A. E.
(
2015)
Judgment evidence for statistical preemption: It is relatively better to vanish than to disappear a rabbit, but a lifeguard can equally well backstroke or swim children to shore.
Cognitive Linguistics, 261, 467–503.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shin, G-H.
(
2018)
Event structure composition in Korean verbless constructions by particles and verbal nouns: Evidence from newspaper headlines.
Journal of Language Sciences, 25(3), 403–425.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shin, G-H.
(
2020)
Connecting input to comprehension: First language acquisition of active transitives and suffixal passives by Korean-speaking preschool children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sohn, H. M.
(
1999)
The Korean Language. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Suzuki, T., & Kobayashi, T.
(
2017)
Syntactic cues for inferences about causality in language acquisition: Evidence from an argument-drop language.
Language Learning and Development, 131, 24–37.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trueswell, J. C.
(
1996)
The role of lexical frequency in syntactic ambiguity resolution.
Journal of Memory and Language, 351, 566–585.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trueswell, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K.
(
1994)
Toward a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. In
C. Clifton,
K. Rayner &
L. Frazier (Eds.),
Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 155–179). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wittek, A., & Tomasello, M.
(
2005)
German-speaking children’s productivity with syntactic constructions and case morphology: Local cues act locally.
First Language, 251, 103–125.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yong, N., & Lee, M.
(
2012)
Semantic effects of a pre-verbal argument on the online processing of Korean sentences: An eye-tracking study.
Korean Journal of Linguistics, 371, 639–657.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A.
(
1998)
Situation models in language comprehension and memory.
Psychological Bulletin, 1231, 162–185.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Kim, Hyunwoo & Gyu-Ho Shin
Liu, Yingying & Kevin McManus
2023.
Investigating the psychological reality of argument structure constructions and N1 of N2 constructions: a comparison between L1 and L2 speakers of English.
Cognitive Linguistics 34:3-4
► pp. 503 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.