Cover not available
Article published In:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 19:2 (2021) ► pp.563–589

Cultural conceptualisations of loong (龙) in Chinese idioms

 | Southwest University
 | Southwest University
This study investigates the abundant metaphorical meanings of the term loong (‘dragon’) in Chinese idioms and the cognitive and cultural factors that influence those meanings from the perspective of Cultural Linguistics. To this end, we present a systematic categorisation of the idiomatic expressions involving the term loong in Mandarin Chinese based on three conceptual metaphors: a human being is a loong, a concrete entity is a loong, and an abstract object is a loong. We then elaborate on the cultural conceptualisations of loong from three perspectives: cultural schemas, cultural categories, and cultural metaphors. The results of the study show how the metaphorical conceptualisations of loong are profoundly influenced by Chinese culture. The resulting study is intended to add to the pool of studies which lend support to the view that a fine-grained study of the metaphors of a particular culture and their linguistic realisation can shed light on how culture influences human cognition. Finally, the study calls for a clearer integration of cultural approaches into conceptual metaphor theory and it explores some possibilities in this regard.
Keywords: cultural conceptualisation, conceptual metaphor, loong , Chinese idioms
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background and review
    • 2.1Cultural cognition and cultural conceptualisation
    • 2.2Conceptual metaphor and cultural metaphor
    • 2.3Previous studies on cultural conceptualisations in Mandarin Chinese
  • 3.Data description and analysis
    • 3.1 a human being is a loong
    • 3.2 a concrete entity is a loong
    • 3.3 an abstract object is a loong
    • 3.4Summary of results
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Cultural categories of the term loong
    • 4.2Cultural schemas of the term loong
    • 4.3The role of culture in cultural metaphors of the loong
  • 5.Conclusions and prospects
  • References
Published online: 11 October 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00095.wen
References (41)
References
Alvanoudi, A. (2017). The interface between language and cultural conceptualisations of gender in interaction: The case of Greek. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics (pp.125–147). Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ansah, G. N. (2017). Cultural conceptualisations of DEMOCRACY and political discourse practices in Ghana. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics (pp. 369–387). Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Athanasiadou, A. (2017). Cultural conceptualisations of irony in Greek. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics (pp. 111–123). Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bagasheva, A. (2017). Cultural conceptualisations of MOUTH, LIPS, TONGUE and TEETH in Bulgarian and English. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics (pp. 189–221). Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baranyiné Kóczy, J. (2017). Cultural conceptualisations of river in Hungarian Folksongs. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics (pp. 223–245). Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benczes, R., Burridge, K., Sharifian, F., & Allan, K. (2017). Cultural Linguistics and ageing: What naming practices in Australian English can reveal about underlying cultural conceptualisations. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics (pp. 607–624). Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fang, N. (2019). Chinese-Australian cultural conceptualisations of ancestor worship, death and family. World Englishes, 38(4), 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaby, A. (2017). Kinship semantics: Culture in the lexicon. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics (pp. 173–188). Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1999). Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr., & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 145–166). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
He, X. (1990). Long: Shenhua yu zhenxiang (Dragon: Myth and truth). Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Jensen, K. E. (2017). Corpora and cultural cognition: How corpus-linguistic methodology can contribute to Cultural Linguistics. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics (pp. 477–505). Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2020a). Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020b). An extended view of conceptual metaphor theory. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 18(1), 112–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). The neural theory of metaphor. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 17–38). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003) [1980]. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, W. G. (2007). A dictionary of Chinese idioms. Shanghai: Shanghai Lexicographical Publishing House.Google Scholar
Lu, W. (2017). Cultural conceptualisations of DEATH in Taiwanese Buddhist and Christian Eulogistic idioms. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics (pp.49–64). Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mendes de Oliveira, M. (2018). Cultural conceptualisations of business negotiations in the Expanding Circle. World Englishes, 37(4), 684–696. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A. (2017). Metaphor and cultural cognition. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics (pp. 325–344). Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onchoke, S. A., & Wen, X. (2017). Leader metaphors in Ekegusii language. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 4(2), 194–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polzenhagen, F., & Frey, S. (2017). Are marriages made in heaven? A cultural-linguistic case study on Indian-English matrimonials. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics (pp. 573–605). Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prodanović Stankić, D. (2017). Cultural conceptualisations in humorous discourse in English and Serbian. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics (pp. 29–48). Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2017). Metaphor and other cognitive operations in interaction: From basicity to complexity. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition, and discourse (pp. 138–159). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2021). Ten lectures on cognitive modeling: Between grammar and grammar-based inferencing. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharifian, F. (2009). On collective cognition and language. In H. Pishwa (Ed.), Language and social cognition: Expression of social mind (pp. 163–182). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2011). Cultural conceptualisations and language: Theoretical framework and applications. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017a). Cultural linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017b). Cultural linguistics: The state of the art. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics (pp. 1–28). Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017c). Cultural linguistics and linguistic relativity. Language Sciences, 591, 83–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharifian, F., & Palmer, G. B. (Eds.). (2007). Applied cultural linguistics: Implications for second language learning and intercultural communication. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharifian, F., & Tayebi, T. (2017). Perceptions of Impoliteness from a cultural linguistics perspective. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics (pp. 389–409). Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stavrianos, L. S. (2012). A global history: From prehistory to the 21st century (Wu, X. Y., Liang, C. M., Dong, S. H., & Wang, C. Trans.) Beijing: Peking University Press. (Original work published 1970)Google Scholar
Wilson, P. A., & Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (2017). Pride in British English and Polish: A cultural-linguistic perspective. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics (pp. 274–288). Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xia, Z. N. (1999). Ci hai. Shanghai: Shanghai Lexicographical Publishing House.Google Scholar
Xu, Z., & Sharifian, F. (2018). Cultural conceptualisations of Chinese zodiac animals in Chinese English. World Englishes, 37(4), 590–606.Google Scholar
Yu, N. (2017). LIFE AS OPERA: A cultural metaphor in Chinese. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics (pp. 65–87). Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Q. G. (1992). A study of dragons, east and west. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Chen, Chuanhong & Xu Wen
2024. Metaphorical richness. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:2 ► pp. 334 ff. DOI logo
Lai, Huei-ling & Hsiao-Ling Hsu
2024. DOG and CAT proverbs. Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo
Wen, Xu & Chuanhong Chen
2024. WHAT DOES LOONG (龙) MEAN TO THE CHINESE PEOPLE? A CULTURAL COGNITIVE LINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVE. Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Zhao, Yali, Nor Fariza Mohd Nor & Imran Ho Abdullah
2023. The Metaphorical and Metonymical Conceptualizations of the Term Sea (Hai) in the Four-Character Chinese Idioms. Languages 8:4 ► pp. 260 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.