Cover not available
Article published In:
Living Metaphors and Metonymies
Edited by Mario Brdar and Rita Brdar-Szabó
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1] 2022
► pp. 91–103

The heart of the matter: A matter of the heart

The crucifixion of Jesus from a cognitive semantic perspective

| Eötvös Loránd University

Why should Jesus die? I attempt to investigate the symbolic roots and significance of the crucifixion by means of the conceptual tools and methodology of cognitive semantics. In particular, I propose that we approach the meaning of Jesus’ death on four symbolic levels:

  • the level where Jesus is a sacrificial lamb;

  • the level where Jesus is a scapegoat and a sufferer for people’s sins;

  • the level where Jesus is a redeemer and a savior;

  • the level where Jesus is bread and wine in the Holy Communion.

I suggest that all four levels prove distinct yet interdependent interpretations for the crucifixion. The different interpretations bring to the fore different aspects of the figure of Jesus and his death. While all of these aspects have been studied extensively by various authors from a cognitive linguistic perspective, my focus will be on the interrelations and interdependence of the four interpretations of Jesus’ figure and death.

Keywords: biblical interpretation, metaphors for the crucifixion, metaphors for the Holy Communion, conceptual metaphor, conceptual metonymy, conceptual blending
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Jesus as sacrificial lamb
  • 3.Jesus as scapegoat and sufferer for all people
  • 4.Jesus as redeemer and savior
  • 5.The Holy Communion
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 24 May 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00102.kov
References
Barcelona, A.
(2003) The metaphorical and metonymic understanding of the trinitarian dogma. IJES, 3 (l), 1–27.Google Scholar
Bible Gateway
[URL]
Brdar-Szabó, R.
(2012) How night gets transformed into a cross: Poetic imagery in Edith Stein’s Science of the Cross. In S. Kleinke, Z. Kövecses, A. Musolff & V. Szelid (Eds.), Cognition and culture. The role of metaphor and metonymy (pp. 1163–177). Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University Press.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J.
(2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Fire metaphors. Discourses of awe and authority. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(2002) The way we think. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Johnson, G.
(2003) The economies of grace as gift and moral accounting: insights from cognitive linguistics. In K. Feyaerts (Ed.), The Bible through metaphor and translation. A cognitive semantic perspective (pp. 87–111). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2002/2010) Metaphor. A practical introduction. Second revised edition 2010 Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Language, mind, and culture. A practical introduction. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2011) The biblical story retold: A cognitive linguistic perspective. In M. Brdar, S. Th. Gries & M. Z. Fuchs (Eds)., Cognitive Linguistics. Convergence and expansion (pp. 325–354). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzeszowski, T.
(1997) Angels and devils in hell. Elements of axiology in semantics (pp. 264–267). Warsaw, Poland: Energeia.Google Scholar
(1997) Angels and devils in hell. Elements of axiology in semantics (pp. 262–263). Warsaw, Poland: Energeia.Google Scholar
Kuczok, M.
(2020) The interplay of metaphor and metonymy in Christian symbols. Metaphor and Symbol, 35 (4), 236–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1996) Moral politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh. The embodied mind and its challenges to Western thought (pp. 292–296). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Richardson, P., Mueller, C. M., & Pihlaja, S.
(2021) Cognitive Linguistics and religious language. An introduction (pp. 107–110). New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shaver, S.
2021). Metaphors of Eucharistic presence: Language, cognition, and the body and blood of Christ. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logo
Sweetser, E.
(2000) Blended spaces and performativity. Cognitive Linguistics 11 (3/4), 305–333.Google Scholar
Szelid, V.
(2012) Set me as a seal upon thine heart: A cognitive linguistic analysis of the Song of Songs. In S. Kleinke, Z. Kövecses, A. Musolff & V. Szelid (Eds.), Cognition and culture. The role of metaphor and metonymy (pp. 178–190). Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University Press.Google Scholar