Review published In:
Living Metaphors and Metonymies
Edited by Mario Brdar and Rita Brdar-Szabó
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1] 2022
► pp. 290297
References (11)
References
Barðdal, J. (1999). Case and argument structure of some loan verbs in15th Century Icelandic. In I. Haskå & C. Sandqvist (Eds.), Alla tiders språk: En Vänskrift till Gertrud Pettersson november 1999 (pp. 9–23). Lundastudier i Nordisk språkvetenskap A 55. Lund: Dept. of Scandinavian Languages.Google Scholar
Cappelle, B. (2006). Particle placement and the case for “allostructions”. Constructions SV, 1 (7), 1–28.Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, G., & Smirnova, E. (2012). Paradigmatic integration. In K. Davidse, T. Breban, L. Brems, & T. Mortelmans (Eds.), Grammaticalization and language change: New reflections (pp. 111–134). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2019). Explain me this. Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Janda, L. A. (2013). Quantitative methods in Cognitive Linguistics. In L. A. Janda (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: The quantitative turn (pp. 1–32). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leino, J. & Östman, J.-O. (2005). Constructions and variability. In M. Fried & H. Boas (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Back to the roots (pp. 191–213). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H.-J. (ed.). (2016). Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van de Velde, F. (2014). Degeneracy: The maintenance of constructional networks. In R. Boogaart, T. Colleman & G. Rutten (Eds.), Extending the scope of construction grammar (pp. 141–179). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar