Antonym order in English and Chinese coordinate structures
A multifactorial analysis
This study presents a contrastive analysis of antonym order in English and Chinese coordinate structures using a multifactorial corpus method. The analysis yields the following findings. First, antonym ordering in coordinate structures is driven largely by the same ordering constraints across the two languages. Chronology and Positivity are the most prominent semantic motivating constraints, and Morphology is the most important formal motivating constraint. Second, there are some differences in constraints on antonym ordering between English and Chinese. Age and Gender exert a significant effect on Chinese antonym ordering, but show no effect on English antonym ordering. Hierarchical Superiority significantly affects Chinese antonym ordering, but has only a marginal effect on English antonym ordering. Furthermore, this study explores the motivations underlying these similarities and differences and argues that there is a clear correlation between iconicity and antonym order. The exploration reveals that their similarities in semantic constraints may be attributed to the iconicity of closeness and the iconicity of temporal sequence, while their differences may be ascribed to the iconicity of cultural values and norms. Their similarities in formal constraints stem from cognitive accessibility. These findings provide further evidence that antonym order is determined by general cognitive principles.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Previous studies on antonym order
- 2.1Studies on antonym co-occurrence
- 2.2Studies on antonym order in English and Chinese
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Corpora
- 3.2Data collection
- 3.3Data annotation
- 3.3.1Semantic constraints
- 3.3.2Phonological and morphological constraints
- 3.4Statistical evaluation
- 4.Results
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1Iconicity and semantic constraints governing antonym ordering in English and Chinese coordinate structures
- 5.1.1Iconicity and the similarities in semantic constraints governing Chinese and English antonym ordering
- 5.1.2Iconicity and the differences in semantic constraints governing Chinese and English antonym ordering
- 5.2Accessibility and formal constraints governing Chinese and English antonym ordering
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References (72)
References
Benor, S. B., & Levy, B. (2006). The chicken or the egg? A probabilistic analysis of English binomials. Language,
8
(2), 233–278. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biq, Y., Tai, J., & Thompson, S. (1996). Recent developments in functional approaches to Chinese. In C. Huang & Y. Li (Eds.), New horizons in Chinese linguistics (pp. 97–140). Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Birdsong, D. P. (1979). Psycholinguistic perspectives on the phonology of frozen word order. Doctoral dissertation. Harvard University.
Bock, J. K., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 945–984). San Diego: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boucher, J., & Osgood, C. E. (1969). The Pollyanna hypothesis. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,
8
(1), 1–8. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bresnan, J., Cueni, A., Nikitina, T., & Baayen, R. H. (2007). Predicting the dative alternation. In G. Bouma, I. Krämer & J. Zwarts (Eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation (pp. 69–94). Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charles, W., & Miller, G. (1989). Contexts of antonymous adjectives. Applied Psycholinguistics,
10
(3), 357–375. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chen, G., & Chung, J. (1994). The impact of Confucianism on organizational communication. Communication Quarterly,
42
(2), 93–105. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cooper, W. E., & Klouda, G. V. (1995). The psychological basis of syntactic iconicity. In M. E. Landsberg (Ed.), Syntactic iconicity and linguistic freezes: The human dimension (pp. 331–342). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cooper, W. E., & Ross, J. R. (1975). Word order. In E. Robin, L. Grossman, S. James & J. V. Timothy (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on functionalism (pp. 63–111). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davies, M. (2013). Opposition and ideology in news discourse. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diessel, H. (2008). Iconicity of sequence: A corpus-based analysis of the positioning of temporal adverbial clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics,
19
(3), 465–490. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ding, J. (2018). A Lexical semantic study of Chinese opposites. Singapore: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ding, J., & Huang, C. (2014). Word ordering in Chinese opposite compounds. In S. Xu & T. He (Eds.), Proceedings of Chinese lexical semantics workshop, CLSW 2014 (pp. 12–20). Heidelberg: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Enghels, R., Defrancq, B., & Jansegers, M. (2020). Reflections on the use of data and methods in contrastive linguistics. In R. Enghels, B. Defrancq & M. Jansegers (Eds.), New approaches to contrastive linguistics: Empirical and methodological challenges (pp. 1–20). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fellbaum, C. (1995). Co-occurrence and antonymy. International Journal of Lexicography,
8
(4), 281–303. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gries, S. Th. (2003). Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: A study of particle placement. London: Continuum Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gries, S. Th. (2009). Quantitative corpus linguistics with R: A practical introduction. London & New York: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gries, S. Th., Jansegers, M., & Miglio, V. G. (2020). Quantitative methods for corpus-based contrastive linguistics. In R. Enghels, B. Defrancq & M. Jansegers (Eds.), New approaches to contrastive linguistics: Empirical and methodological Challenges (pp. 53–84). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haiman, J. (1980). The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language,
56
(3), 515–540. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Han, J., & Song, D. (2005). Antonym dictionary. Chengdu: Sichuan People’s Publishing House.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ho, D. Y. F. (1996). Filial piety and its psychological consequences. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 55–165). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hsu, C. (2015). A syntagmatic analysis of antonym co-occurrences in Chinese: Contrastive constructions and co-occurrence sequences. Corpora,
10
(1), 47–82. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hsu, C. (2019). A corpus-based study on the functions of antonym co-occurrences in spoken Chinese. Text & Talk,
39
(4), 535–561. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hwang, K. K. (1999). Filial piety and loyalty: Two types of social identification in Confucianism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology,
2
(1), 63–183. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jones, S. (2002). Antonymy: A corpus-based perspective. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jones, S. (2006). A lexico-syntactic analysis of antonym co-occurrence in spoken English. Text & Talk,
26
(2), 191–216. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jones, S., Murphy, M. L., Paradis, C., & Willners, C. (2012). Antonyms in English: Construals, constructions and canonicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Justeson, J. S., & Katz, S. M. (1991). Co-occurrences of antonymous adjectives and their contexts. Computational Linguistics,
17
1, 1–19.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kolahdouz, M. M., Reza Gholi Famian, A., & Aghagolzadeh, F. (2019). Antonym sequence in Persian: A corpus-based study. Language Research,
10
(1), 129–140.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kostić, N. (2011). Antonymous frameworks in Serbian written discourse: Phrasal contexts of antonym co-occurrence in text. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics,
47
(3), 509–537. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kostić, N. (2015). Antonym sequence in written discourse: A corpus-based study. Language Sciences,
47
1, 18–31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landsberg, M. E. (1995). Semantic constraints on phonologically independent freezes. In M. E. Landberg (Ed.), Syntactic iconicity and linguistic freezes: The human dimension (pp. 65–78). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langendonck, W. V. (1995). Categories of word order iconicity. In M. E. Landsberg (Ed.), Syntactic iconicity and linguistic freezes: The human dimension (pp. 79–90). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levy, R. (2012). Probabilistic models in the study of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liao, Q. (1992). The order of co-nominal elements in modern Chinese. Chinese Linguistics, (3), 161–173.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liu, S. (2015). A Corpus study of the ordering constraints of coordinate binomials in English and Chinese: Reversibility and prediction success rate. Foreign Language Education,
36
(6), 39–43.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lohmann, A. (2014). English co-ordinate constructions: A processing perspective on constituent order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lohmann, A., & Takada, T. (2014). Order in NP conjuncts in spoken English and Japanese. Lingua,
152
1, 48–64. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lu, W. (2002). The cognitive basis of word order. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, (5), 5–9.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lyons, G. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malkiel, Y. (1959). Studies in irreversible binomials. Lingua,
8
1, 113–160. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manser, H. M. (1989). Chambers dictionary of synonyms and antonyms. Cambridge: Chambers Harrap Publishers Ltd.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matlin, M. W., & Stang, D. J. (1978). The Pollyanna principle: Selectivity in language, memory, and thought. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mayerthaler, W. (1988). Morphological naturalness. Trans. By Janice Seidler. Ann Arbor: Karoma.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mettinger, A. (1994). Aspects of semantic opposition in English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morgan, E., & Levy, R. (2016). Abstract knowledge versus direct experience in processing of binominal expressions. Cognition,
157
1, 384–402. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Murphy, M. L. (2003). Semantic relations and the lexicon: Antonyms, synonyms and other semantic paradigms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Murphy, M. L. (2006). Antonymy as lexical constructions: or, why paradigmatic construction is not an oxymoron. In D. Schönefeld (Ed.), Constructions All Over: Case Studies and Theoretical Implications. Constructions SV 1 (pp.1–37). Available at: <[URL]>. Accessed: 25 March 2020.
Osgood, C. E., May, W. H., & Smith, E. E. (1975). Cross-cultural universals of affective meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Panther, K. U., & Thornburg, L. L. (2012). Antonymy in language and use. In M. Brdar, I. Raffaelli & M. Ž. Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics between universality and variation (pp. 161–188). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Renner, V. (2014). A study of element ordering in English coordinate lexical items. English Studies,
95
(4), 441–458. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shu, D., & Huang, J. (2008). A cognitive approach to the internal sequence and semantic changes of Chinese antonymic compounds. Foreign Language Teaching and Research,
40
(1), 418–422.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spooner, A. (2007). The Oxford dictionary of synonyms and antonyms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stallings, L. M., MacDonald, M. C., & O’Seaghdha, P. G. (1998). Phrasal ordering constraints in sentence production: Phrase length and verb disposition in heavy-NP shift. Journal of Memory and Language,
39
(3), 392–417. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tachihara, K., & Goldberg, A. E. (2020). Cognitive accessibility predicts word order of couples’ names in English and Japanese. Cognitive Linguistics,
31
(2), 231–249. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trotzke, A., & Wittenberg, E. (2019). Long-standing issues in adjective order and corpus evidence for a multifactorial approach. Linguistics,
57
(2), 273–282. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Willners, C. (2001). Antonyms in context: A corpus-based semantic analysis of Swedish descriptive adjectives. Doctoral dissertation. Lund University.
Wu, S. (2014). The metonymic interpretation of Chinese antonym co-occurrence constructions: The case of you X you Y. Language Sciences,
45
1, 189–201. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wu, S. (2017). Iconicity and viewpoint: Antonym order in Chinese four-character patterns. Language Sciences,
59
1, 117–134. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xu, A. (2000). Antonym application dictionary. Beijing: Language and Culture Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xu, Z., & Zhang, G. (2015). A study on Chinese local morpheme antonym of nouns. Fudan Journal (Social Sciences),
57
(4), 41–50.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, Q., & Zhang, Z. (2009). Antonym dictionary. Shanghai: Shanghai Lexicographical Publishing House.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Hassanein, Hamada S.A. & Basant S.M. Moustafa
2024.
Sequential order of antonym pairs in Modern Standard Arabic: A corpus-based analysis.
Lingua 306
► pp. 103742 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Wang, Yajun
2023.
2023 IEEE 15th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN),
► pp. 764 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.