Cover not available
Article published In:
Applying Embodied Cognition and Cognitive Linguistics to language teaching
Edited by Paolo Della Putta and Ferran Suñer
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 21:1] 2023
► pp. 35–63
Special issue articles

Bodily engagement in the learning and teaching of grammar

On the effects of different embodied practices on the acquisition of German modal verbs

| Université Catholique de Louvain
| Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
| Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

Cognitive Linguistics claims that language is not purely abstract and arbitrary, but meaningful and grounded in concepts arising from our embodied experiences (Oakley, 2007). The potential of using imagery and bodily representations to explain the conceptual motivation of grammar has been widely recognized in the context of language acquisition and teaching. This study investigates whether an increase of learners’ bodily engagement through the performance of bodily movements and locomotion produces even greater learning outcomes. To this end, we refer to Talmy’s (2000) Force Dynamic System to conduct a pretest-posttest interventional study with two groups of learners dealing with the German modal verb system. Whereas the first group watched multimedia animations (low bodily engagement), the second group was asked to perform bodily movements in line with the force-dynamic notions underlying the different modal verbs (high bodily engagement). The results show that both groups produced similar learning gains and that an increased bodily engagement could not be associated directly with a significantly better performance.

Keywords: embodiment, grammar learning, animations, force-dynamics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Embodiment and language teaching
  • 3.A Force Dynamic approach to the description of the German modal verbs
    • Müssen/sollen
    • Dürfen/können
    • Wollen/möchten
  • 4.Research questions
  • 5.The study
    • 5.1Participants and materials
    • 5.2Data collection procedure
    • 5.3Data analysis
  • 6.Results
  • 7.Discussion and outlook
  • References
Published online: 31 January 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00126.sun
References
Achard, M.
(1998) Representation of cognitive structures. Syntax and semantics of French sentential complements. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnett, C., & Suñer, F.
(2019) Leveraging cognitive linguistic approaches to grammar teaching with multimedia animations. Journal of Cognitive Science, 20 (3), 365–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asher, J.
(1977) Learning Another Language Through Actions: The Complete Teacher’s Guidebook. California: Sky Oaks Productions.Google Scholar
Bergen, B., & Wheeler, K.
(2010) Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Brain and Language, 112 (3), 150–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bielak, J., & Pawlak, M.
(2011) Teaching English tense and aspect with the help of cognitive grammar: An empirical study. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1 (3), 365–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Applying cognitive grammar in the foreign language classroom: Teaching english tense and aspect. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boieblan, M.
(2022) Enhancing English spatial prepositions acquisition among Spanish learners of English as L2 through an embodied approach. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, ahead of print. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, K.
(2001) The force-dynamic core meaning of Danish modal verbs. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics, 33 1, 19–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comisso & Della Putta
in this issue. Fostering the learning of the Russian motion verbs system in Italian-speaking students: An experimental study inspired by embodied approaches to language teaching.
Council of Europe
(2001) Common European framework of reference for languages learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, MA Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Knop, S.
(2020) The embodied teaching of complex verbal constructions with German placement verbs and spatial prepositions. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 18 (1), 131–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dimitrov, D. M., & Rumrill, P. D.
(2003) Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. Work, 20 (2), 159–165.Google Scholar
Duden
(2005) Die Grammatik. Unentbehrlich für richtiges Deutsch, 7. edition. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C.
(2019) Essentials of a theory of language cognition. The Modern Language Journal, 103 1, 39–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, V., & Green, M.
(2006) Cognitive Linguistics: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ and Edinburgh: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates/Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S., & Lindgren, R.
(2015) Enactive metaphors: Learning through full-body engagement. Educational Psychology Review, 27 (3), 391–404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glenberg, A., Witt, J., & Metcalfe, J.
(2013) From the revolution to embodiment: 25 years of cognitive psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8 (5), 573–585. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, E. K.
(1999) Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners’ beliefs about language learning: a review of BALLI studies. System, 27 1, 57–576. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huumo, T.
(2017) The grammar of temporal motion: A Cognitive Grammar account of motion metaphors of time. Cognitive Linguistics, 28 (1), 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionescu, T., & Ilie, A.
(2018) Language learning in preschool children: an embodied learning account. Early Child Development and Care, 188 (1), 4–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, N.
(2018) The best of both worlds: Combining cognitive linguistics and pedagogic tasks to teach English conditionals. Applied Linguistics, 39 (5), 668–693.Google Scholar
Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., Birchfield, D. A., Tolentino, L., & Koziupa, T.
(2014) Collaborative embodied learning in mixed reality motion-capture environments: Two science studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106 1, 86–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., Megowan-Romanowicz, C., Birchfield, D. A., & Savio-Ramos, C.
(2016) Effects of embodied learning and digital platform on the retention of physics content: Centripetal force. Frontiers in Psychology, 7 1, 1819. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Glenberg, M. C.; Bartolomea, H., & Kalina, E.
(2021) Platform is not destiny: Embodied learning effects comparing 2D desktop to 3D virtual reality STEM experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37 (5), 1263–1284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanaplianik, K.
(2016) Kognitionslinguistische Animationen für die deutschen Modalverben. Zusammenspiel der kognitiven Linguistik und des multimedialen Lernens bei der Sprachvermittlung. Berlin & Münster: Lit.Google Scholar
Kohl-Dietrich, D., Juchem-Grundmann, C., & Schnotz, W.
(2016) Conceptual Motivation as a tool for raising language awareness in the English as a foreign language classroom – Does it enhance learning outcomes? Insights from an empirical study. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 4 (1), 193–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladendorf, K., Schneider, D., & Xie, Y.
(2019) Mobile-based virtual reality: Why and how does it support learning? In A. Zhang & D. Cristol (Eds.), Handbook of mobile teaching and learning (2nd ed.) (pp. 1–19). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2008) Essentials of Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2009) Teaching and testing grammar. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 518–542). Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S., & Johnson, E.
(2016) Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers and Education, 95 1, 174–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S., Li, S., Fei, F., Thompson, A., Nakatsukasa, K., Ahn, S., & Xiaoquing, C.
(2009) L2 learners’ beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. Modern Language Journal, 93 (1), 91–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E.
(2014) Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, (pp. 43–71). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mortelmans, T.
(2001) An introduction to Langacker grounding predications mood and modal verbs in German. In H. Vater & O. Letnes (Eds.), Modalität und mehr. Modality and more (pp. 3–26). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Niemeier, S.
(2017) Task-based grammar teaching of English: Where cognitive grammar and task-based Language teaching meet. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Oakley, T.
(2007) Image schemas. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 214–235). Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, F.
(1990) Modality and the English modals (2nd ed). London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Puchta, Herbert
(2010) Beyond materials, techniques and linguistic analyses: The role of motivation, beliefs and identity. Puertas Abiertas, 6 1. Link: [URL] [Accessed on April 21, 2022].
Purpura, J. E.
(2004) Assessing grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Qin, J., Zhangxin, W., & Shuneng, Z.
(2022) When concept-based language instruction meets Cognitive Linguistics: teaching English phrasal verbs with up and out. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, ahead of print. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radden, G., & Dirven, R.
(2007) Cognitive English grammar. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roche, J.
(2013) Mehrsprachigkeitstheorie. Erwerb – Kognition – Transkulturation – Ökologie. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
(2020) Das Aktuelle Grammatikstudio A1. München: hueber/Multilingua Akademie. Link: [URL]
Roche, J., & Scheller, J.
(2008) Grammar animations and cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In F. Zhang & B. Barber (Eds.), Handbook of research on computer-enhanced language acquisition and learning (pp. 205–219). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roche, J., & Suñer, F.
(2016) Metaphors and grammar teaching. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 4 (1), 89–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohrer, T.
(2006) Image schemata in the brain. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 165–196). Berlin & Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Scheller, J.
(2009) Animationen in der Grammatikvermittlung. Multimedialer Spracherwerb am Beispiel von Wechselpräpositionen. Berlin & Münster: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
Shapiro, L.
(2019) Embodied cognition (2nd ed). London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, L., & Stolz, A.
(2019) Embodied cognition and its significance for education. Theory and Research in Education, 17 (1), 19–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skulmowski, A., & Rey, G. D.
(2018) Embodied learning: introducing a taxonomy based on bodily engagement and task integration. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3 (1), 6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, H. S., Pusic, M., Nick, M. W., Sarpel, U., Plass, J. L., & Kalet, A. L.
(2014) The cognitive impact of interactive design features for learning complex materials in medical education. Computers & Education, 71 1, 198–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stolz, S.
(2015) Embodied learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47 (5), 474–487. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suñer, F., & Roche, J.
(2021) Embodiment in concept-based L2 grammar teaching: The case of German light verb constructions. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 16 (4), 495–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E.
(1990) From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
(1988) Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12 1, 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tran, C., Smith, B., & Buschkuehl, M.
(2017) Support of mathematical thinking through embodied cognition: Nondigital and digital approaches. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2 1, 16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A.
(2008) Cognitive linguistics and second language instruction. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 456–488). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E.
(2017) The embodied mind. Revised edition: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vater, H.
(2010) Möchten als Modalverb. In A. Kątny & A. Socka (Eds.), Modalität. Temporalität in kontrastiver und typologischer Sicht (pp. 99–112). Frankfurt am Main/New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Vázquez, C. D., Xia, L., Aikawa, T., & Maes, P.
(2018) Words in motion: Kinesthetic language learning in virtual reality. In 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 9–13). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zakhia Doueihi, J., & François, T.
(2022) Concept-based instruction for applied L2 acquisition. Systematic review. Pedagogical Linguistics, 3 (1), 84–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar