Article published In:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 21:2 (2023) ► pp.515541
References (54)
List of References
Arnett, C., & Deifel, K. (2015). Two-way prepositions and L2 Students of German. In K. Masuda, C. Arnett & A. Labarca (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics and sociocultural theory: Applications for second and foreign language teaching (pp. 183–201). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bellavia, E. (1996). The German über . In M. Pütz & R. Dirven (Eds.), The construal of space in language and thought (pp. 73–107). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bender, A., Bennardo, G., & Beller, S. (2005). Spatial frames of reference for temporal relations: A conceptual analysis in English, German, and Tongan. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 220–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bergen, B. (2012). Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Boers, F. (1996). Spatial prepositions and metaphor. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Boers, F., & Demecheleer, M. (1998). A cognitive semantic approach to teaching prepositions. ELT journal, 53 (3), 197–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brugman, C. (1981). The story of over: Polysemy, semantics, and the structure of the lexicon. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1968). Weighed kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70 (4), 213–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coventry, K. R. (2015). Space. In E. Dabrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 489–507). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dabrowska, E. (2016). Cognitive Linguistics’ seven deadly sins. Cognitive Linguistics, 27 (4), 479–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewell, R. (1994). Over again: Image-schema transformations in semantic analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 5 (4), 351–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, V. (2005). The meaning of time: polysemy, the lexicon and conceptual structure. Journal of Linguistics, 41 (1), 33–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An introduction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D., Dirven, R., & Taylor, J. R. (Eds.) (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: Basic readings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glynn, D. (2010). Corpus-driven Cognitive Semantics: Introduction to the field. In D. Glynn & K. Fischer, Quantitative methods in Cognitive Semantics. Corpus-Driven Approaches (pp. 1–45). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grady, J. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
(2005). Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 37 1, 1595–1614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th. (2015). Polysemy. In E. Dabrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 472–490). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hampe, B. (2005). Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics: Introduction. In J. E. Grady & B. Hampe (2005), From perception to meaning. Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 1–14), Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herskovits, A. (1986). Language and spatial cognition. An interdisciplinary study of the prepositions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Print.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning. Imagination, and reason. University of Chicago. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalisz, R. (1990). A cognitive approach to spatial terms represented by in front of and behind in English, and their metaphorical extensions. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & J. Tomaszczyk (Eds.), Meaning and lexicography (pp. 167–180). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kermer, F. (2021). Semantic network of the German preposition hinter . Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 19 (2), 403–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy, 77 (8), 453–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1993). Reference-Point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4 1, 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996). Viewing in cognition and grammar. In P. W. Davis (Ed.), Alternative linguistics: Descriptive and theoretical modes (pp. 153–212). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin & Amsterdam: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liamkina, O. (2007). Semantic structure of the German Spatial Particle über . Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 19 (2), 115–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindstromberg, S. (2010). English prepositions explained (Revised ed.). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). An update on frequent English spatial prepositions: Are they monosemic, polysemic, or something else? DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandler, J. (2004). The foundations of mind: Origins of conceptual thought. USA: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meex, B. (2002). Die Wegpreposition über . In H. Cuyckens & G. Radden, Perspectives on prepositions (pp. 157–176). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nüse, R. (2007). Der Gebrauch und die Bedeutungen von auf, an und unter . Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 35 (1), 27–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pütz, D., & Dirven, R. (Eds.) (1996). The construal of space in language and thought. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radden, G., & Dirven, R. (2007). Cognitive English grammar. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representation of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 104 1, 192–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. I. Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
(2007). Attention phenomena. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 264–293). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. (2002). Cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tenbrink, T. (2020). Cognitive discourse analysis. An introduction. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turewicz, K. (2004). Understanding prepositions through cognitive grammar. A case of IN. In K. Turewicz, Cognitive Linguistics – a user friendly approach (pp. 100–126). Szczecin: Szczecin University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2001). Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: The case of over. Language, 77 1, 724–765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Spatial scenes: A cognitive approach to English prepositions and the experiential basis of meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vandelanotte, L., & Dancygier, B. (2017). Multimodal artefacts and the texture of viewpoint. Journal of Pragmatics, 122 1, 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wunderlich (1985). Raum, Zeit und das Lexikon. In Schweizer, H. (Ed.) Psychologische und linguistische Aspekte der Aneignung und Verarbeitung von Räumlichkeit (pp. 66–89) Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, D. (1993). On German UM: semantic and conceptual aspects. Linguistics, 31 (1), 111–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zelinsky-Wibbelt, C. (1993). Introduction. In C. Zelinsky-Wibbelt (Ed.), The semantics of prepositions: From mental processing to natural language processing (pp. 1–24). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J. (2007). Spatial semantics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 318–350). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar