Article published In:Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Online-First Articles
What foreign language learners make of grammatical descriptions depends on description type, proficiency, and context
Most usage-based research emphasizes the importance of implicit, input-driven learning in naturalistic environments, but recent studies have adopted usage-based grammatical descriptions for instructed learning in classrooms. These descriptions are intended to draw learners’ deliberate attention to relevant usage patterns in the input and thereby support intake. Most of these studies compare usage-based descriptions to other types of descriptions for their efficiency, while little attention has been paid to the ways in which learners understand and apply such descriptions. This study examines what foreign language learners understand of usage-based grammatical descriptions of target structures. In an experimental forced choice task, Chinese learners of German received usage-based descriptions of case structures and then classified target instances in variable contexts. A multivariate regression analysis indicated that choices were influenced by interactions of the type of description with participants’ target-language proficiency and the semantic and lexical target contexts. This is discussed in terms of noticing and category formation. This study argues that learners are able to use grammatical descriptions as some kind of auxiliary model for recognizing and categorizing target patterns. The descriptions thus make learners aware of the mechanisms underlying implicit learning and help them exploit these mechanisms for explicit learning.
Keywords: foreign language learning, instructed learning, usage-based learning, grammar, two-way prepositions, case, L2 German, L1 Chinese
- 2.Instructed and input-driven language learning and their interaction
- 3.The current study
- Target structures
- Material and procedure
- Statistical analysis
Published online: 30 May 2023
Achard, M., & Niemeier, S.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
Bybee, J., & Hopper, P.
(Eds.) (2001) Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Clark-Gareca, B., & Gui, M.
Cobb, T., & Boulton, A.
De Knop, S.
(2008) Sociocultural conceptualizations: Schemas and metaphorical transfer as metalinguistic learning strategies for French learners of German. In M. Pütz & J. Neff-van Aertselaer (Eds.), Developing contrastive pragmatics: Interlanguage and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 47–66). Berlin: De Gruyter.
(2015) Visualization and conceptual metaphor as tools for the teaching of abstract motion in German. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 13 (1), 167–190.
De Knop, S., & Dirven, R.
DeKeyser, R. M.
Diessel, H., & Hilpert, M.
Dolgova, N., & Tyler, A.
Doughty, C. J.
(2014) German two-way prepositions and related phenomena. In N. Delbecque, K. Lahousse & W. Van Langendonck (Eds.), Non-nuclear cases (pp. 95–126). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ellis, N. C.
(2015) Implicit and explicit language learning: Their dynamic interface and complexity. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languague (pp. 3–23). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F.
(2009b) Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7 (1), 187–220.
Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B.
Ellis, N. C., & Wulff, S.
Evers-Vermeul, J., & Tribushinina, E.
Funk, H., Kuhn, C., & Winzer-Kiontke, B.
Goldberg, A. E.
Goo, J., Granena, G., Yilmaz, Y., & Novella, M.
(2015) Implicit and explicit instruction in L2 learning: Norris & Ortega (2000) revisited and updated. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 443–482). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Gries, S. Th
Han, Z., & Finneran, R.
Hoffmann, T., & Trousdale, G.
Kim, H., Hwang, H., & Rah, Y.
Langacker, R. W.
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A.
Loewen, S., & Sato, M.
(1991) Focus on Form. In K. de Bot, R. B. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2018) A unified model of first and second language learning. In M. Hickmann, E. Veneziano, & H. Jisa (Eds.), Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition: Languages, Contexts, and Learners (pp. 287–312). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Min, L., & Nerlich, M.
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
Ortega, L., Tyler, A. E., Park, H. I., & Uno, M.
(2004) A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2009) Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
R Core Team
(2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL]
Raatz, U., & Klein-Braley, C.
(1981) The C-Test–A modification of the cloze procedure. In T. Culhane, C. Klein-Braley & D. K. Stevenson (Eds.), Practice and problems in language testing IV. Proceedings of the fourth international language testing symposium of the Interuniversitäre Sprachtestgruppe held at the University of Essex (pp. 113–138). Colchester: University of Essex.
Reber, A. S.
Roche, J., & EL-Bouz, K.
Rousse-Malpat, A., Steinkrauss, R., Wieling, M., & Verspoor, M.
Rys, J., Willems, K., & De Cuypere, L.
(2014) Akkusativ und Dativ nach Wechselpräpositionen im Deutschen. Eine Korpusanalyse von versinken, versenken, einsinken und einsenken in. In I. Doval & B. Lübke (Eds.), Raumlinguistik und Sprachkontrast: Neue Beiträge zu spatialen Relationen im Deutschen, Englischen und Spanischen (pp. 217–234). München: Iudicium.
Schmidt, R. W.
Smith, M. B.
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y.
Tyler, A. E., Ortega, L., Uno, M., & Park, H. I.
(Eds.) (2018) Usage-inspired L2 instruction: Researched pedagogy. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Willems, K., De Cuypere, L., & Rys, J.
Wilmots, J., & Moonen, E.