Article published In:
Review of Cognitive LinguisticsVol. 22:1 (2024) ► pp.151–203
Capturing meaningful generalizations at varying degrees of resolution
The case of the family of ser muy de-PP constructions in present-day Spanish
This article provides a principled constructionist account (Goldberg & Herbst, 2021) of the main characteristics of expressions like the following: (1) Juan es muy de (ir de) bares (‘Juan is very into (going to) bars’), and (2) Tu ayuda es muy de agradecer (‘Your help is very much appreciated’). Instances of this kind are best handled in terms of coercion between the intensifier and non-stative/non-gradable elements in the nominal slot of the de-PPs. Specifically, these combinations qualify as individual-level predicates with a characterizing, evaluative interpretation. The specific constructional interpretations in (1)–(2) arise from contextual adjustments (Carston, 2015), encoding a person’s habits and a potential modal deontic habituality, respectively. The semantic and pragmatic properties of the sub-constructions in (1)–(2), among others, can be adequately subsumed under a family of ser muy de-PP constructions, with the following general meaning: ‘X (SOMEONE/SOMETHING) (SUBJECT) IS SUBJECTIVELY CONSTRUED AS HAVING Y (A HIGHLIGHTED CLASSIFICATORY PROPERTY OF AN INDIVIDUAL/CLASS) (ATTRIBUTE)’.
Keywords: intensifier, coercion, gradability, subjectivity, pragmatic adjustment
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The semantic and pragmatic contribution of the ser muy de-PP constructions
- 3.Subjectivity, construal, pragmatic adjustment and linguistic cueing
- 4.An overview of the different morphosyntactic realizations of ser muy de-PP constructions in present-day Spanish
- 5.The ser muy de-PP construction with bare nouns, NPs with a definite determiner and NPs with an indefinite determiner
- 6.The ser muy de-PP construction with active infinitival complement clauses
- 7.The ser muy de-PP construction with a que- (‘that’-) complement clause construction
- 8.The modal/evaluative construction with a passive infinitival complement clause
- 9.Outlook and closing remarks
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
Baayen, R. H., & Lieber, R.
(1991) Productivity
and English derivation: A corpus-based
study. Linguistics,
29
(5), 801–844. 
Boas, H. C.
(2003) A constructional approach to resultatives (Stanford Monographs in Linguistics). Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.
Bolinger, D. L.
(1968) Aspects
of language. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
(1972) Degree
words. The Hague: Mouton.
Bosque, I.
(dir.) (2004) REDES.
Diccionario combinatorio del español
contemporáneo. Madrid: Ediciones SM.
Camus Bergareche, B.
(2011) Restricciones
aspectuales y la perífrasis soler +
infinitivo. In J. Cuartero Otal & L. García Fernández (Eds.), Estudios
sobre perífrasis y
aspecto (pp. 120–138). München: Peniope – Verlaj Anja Urbanek.
Cappelle, B.
(2006) Particle
placement and the case for
“allostructions”. Constructions,
SV1
, 7, 1–28.
Carlson, G. N.
(1977) Reference
to kinds in English. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachussets.
Carston, R.
(2015) Contextual
adjustment of meaning. In N. Riemer (Ed.), The
Routledge handbook of
Semantics (pp. 195–210). London: Routledge.
Corpus del Español NOW
Croft, W.
(2003) Lexical
rules vs. constructions: A false dichotomy. In H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven & K. U. Panther (Eds.), Motivation
in language. Studies in honor of Günter
Radden (pp. 49–68). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2012) Verbs:
Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Vaere, H., Kolkmann, J., & Belligh, T.
(2020) Allostructions
revisited. Journal of
Pragmatics,
170
1, 96–111.
Escandell-Vidal, M. V., & Leonetti, M.
(2002) Coercion
and the stage/individual distinction. In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach (Ed.), From
words to
discourse (pp. 159–179). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Fernández-Leborans, M. J.
(1999) La
predicación: Las oraciones copulativas. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Dirs.), Gramática
descriptiva de la lengua
española (pp. 2357–2460). Madrid: RAE/Espasa.
Fernández-Leborans, M. J., & Sánchez López, C.
(2015a) Sentences
as predicates: The Spanish construction <ser muy de +
infinitive>. In I. Pérez-Jiménez, M. Leonetti & S. Gumiel-Molina (Eds.), New
perspectives on the study of ser and
estar (pp. 85–118). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2015b) On
events that express properties. In E. Barrajón, J. L. Cifuentes Honrubia & S. Rodríguez Rosique (Eds.), Verb
classes and
aspect (pp. 238–263). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Fernández Ramírez, S.
(1987) Gramática
Española 4. El verbo y la oración. Madrid: Arco Libros.
Goldberg, A. E.
(2006) Constructions
at work: The nature of generalization in
language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A., Casenhiser, D., & Sethuraman, N.
(2004) Learning
argument structure generalizations. Cognitive
Linguistics,
15
1, 289–316.
Goldberg, A. E., & Herbst, T.
(2021) The
nice-of-you construction and its
fragments. Linguistics,
59
(1), 285–318.
González García, L.
(2012) Estudio
de las construcciones formadas por adjetivo + de + infinitivo (tipo difícil de
entender). In T. E. Jiménez Juliá, B. López Moraima, V. Vázquez Rozas & A. Veiga (Eds.), Cum
corde et in nova grammatica: Estudios ofrecidos a Guillermo
Rojo (pp. 383–397). Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.
Gonzálvez-García, F.
(2011a) Metaphor
and metonymy do not render coercion superfluous: Evidence from the subjective-transitive
construction. Linguistics,
49
(6), 1305–1358.
(2011b) Looks,
appearances and judgements: Towards a unified constructionist analysis of predicative complements in English and
Spanish. In P. Guerrero Medina (Ed.), Morphosyntactic
alternations in English: Functional and cognitive
perspectives (pp. 264–293). London: Equinox.
(2020) Metonymy
meets coercion: The case of the intensification of nouns in attributive and predicative constructions in
Spanish. In A. Baicchi (Ed.), Figurative
meaning construction in thought and language (Figurative Thought and Language,
9) (pp. 151–184). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, E., & Pérez-Ocón, P.
(2021) Un
nuevo análisis de la construcción ser de + infinitivo en español europeo y
americano. Revista del Instituto de Lengua y Cultura
Españolas,
37
(2), 621–649.
Herbst, T.
(2014a) The
valency approach to argument structure constructions. In T. Herbst, H. Schmid & S. Faulhaber (Eds.), Constructions,
collocations,
patterns (pp. 159–207). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2014b) Idiosyncrasies
and generalizations: Argument structure, semantic roles, and the valency realization
principle. In M. Hilpert & S. Flach (Eds.), Yearbook
of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, Jahrbuchder Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kognitive Linguistik, Vol.
II. (pp. 253–289). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2020) Constructions,
generalizations, and the unpredictability of language: Moving towards colloconstruction
grammar. Constructions and
Frames,
12
(1), 56–95.
Herbst, T., & Uhrig, P.
(2020) The
issue of specifying slots in argument structure constructions in terms of form and
meaning. Belgian Journal of
Linguistics,
34
1, 135–147.
Laporte, S., Larsson, T., & Goulart, L.
(2021) Testing
the Principle of No Synonymy across levels of abstraction. A constructional account of subject
extraposition. Constructions and
Frames,
13
(2), 230–262.
Langacker, R. W.
(1991) Foundations
of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
(2019) Paper
6: Construal. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Cognitive
Linguistics – Foundations of
language (pp. 140–166). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lyons, J.
(1982) Deixis
and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum? In R. J. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech,
place, and action: Studies in deixis and related
topics (pp. 101–124). New York: John Wiley.
Michaelis, L.
(2011) Stative
by
construction. Linguistics,
49
(6), 1359–1400.
Moreno Cabrera, J. C.
(1987) Aspectos
lógico-sintácticos de los cuantificadores en español. In V. Demonte & M. Fernández Lagunilla (Eds.), Sintaxis
de las lenguas
románicas (pp. 408–417). Madrid: El Arquero.
Morgan, J. L.
(1973) Sentence
fragments and the notion ‘sentence’. In B. B. Kachru, R. B. Lees, Y. Malkiel, A. Pietrangeli & S. Saporta (Eds.), Issues
in Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Henry and Renée
Kahane (pp. 719–751). Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Peña Cervel, M. S., & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J.
(2022) Figuring
out figuration. A cognitive linguistic account (Figurative Thought and Language,
14). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Portero-Muñoz, C.
(2022) “It’s
way too intriguing!” The fuzzy status of emergent intensifiers: A Functional Discourse Grammar
account. Open
Linguistics,
8
(1), 618–649.
RAE-ASALE
(2009) Nueva gramática de la
lengua
española. Madrid: RAE/Espasa.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J.
(2017) Metaphor
and other cognitive operations in interaction: From basicity to
complexity. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor:
Embodied cognition and
discourse (pp. 138–159). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2021) Ten
lectures on cognitive modeling. Between grammar and language-based inferencing (Distinguished Lectures
in Cognitive Linguistics,
25). Leiden: Brill.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Galera Masegosa, A.
(2014) Cognitive
modeling: A linguistic perspective (Human Cognitive Processing,
45). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Salazar, V.
(2002) La
estructura estar + N en el marco general de las construcciones atributivas en
español. Language
Design,
4
1, 67–91.
Sánchez López, C.
(2002) Las
construcciones con ‘se’. Estado de la cuestión. In C. Sánchez López (Ed.), Las
construcciones con
‘se’ (pp. 13–163). Madrid: Visor.
Scheibman, J.
(2002) Point
of view and grammar: Structural patterns of subjectivity in American English
conversation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2007) Subjective and intersubjective uses of generalizations in English conversations. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 164) (pp. 111–138). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Torrego, E.
(2006) Predication
with characterizing sentences in Spanish. In B. Fernández & I. Laka (Coords.), Andolin
gogoan. Essays in honor of professor
Eguzkitza (pp. 835–853). Bilbao: Publicaciones de la Universidad del País Vasco-EHU.
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
(2013) Constructionalization
and constructional changes (Oxford Studies in Diachronic Linguistics,
6). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Uhrig, P.
(2015) Why
the principle of no synonymy is overrated. Zeitschrift Für Anglistik Und
Amerikanistik,
63
(3), 323–337.
Verhagen, A.
(2005) Constructions
of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and
cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.