Cover not available
Article published In:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 12:1 (2014) ► pp.1–29

Conceptual metaphors as a tool for the efficient teaching of Dutch and German posture verbs

 | Université Saint-Louis, Brussels
 | Université de Liège
The article deals with the typological differences between the Romance language French and the Germanic languages German and Dutch for the linguistic expressions of posture and location. It describes how these typological differences can be problematic for French-speaking learners of German and Dutch. The main difference between both types of languages is that posture and location tend to be encoded by posture verbs in Germanic languages and by very general verbs in Romance languages (Talmy 2000). After a detailed description of the semantic networks of the German and Dutch posture verbs, the paper takes a critical look at how these expressions are dealt with in teaching manuals. It further presents strategies for the efficient teaching of posture verbs to foreign language learners. These strategies are among others awareness-raising exercises about the compulsory use of posture verbs in Germanic languages and the description of conceptual metaphors in different languages. These pedagogical avenues for the efficient teaching of the Dutch and German posture verbs constitute a first step towards the elaboration of an experimental set-up aiming at verifying them.
Keywords: teaching efficiency, typological differences, pedagogical issues, posture verbs, Dutch, French-speaking learners, German, Romance languages, conceptual metaphor, Germanic languages
Published online: 23 April 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.12.1.01kno
References (42)
Ameka, F. K., & Levinson, S. C. (2007). The typology and semantics of locative predicates: posturals, positionals and other beasts. Linguistics, 45(5–6), 847–871.Google Scholar
Aufderstraße, H., Bock, H., Gerdes, M., Müller, J., & Müller, H. (1992). Themen Neu 1: Lehrwerk für Deutsch als Fremdsprache . Kursbuch. Munich: Hueber.Google Scholar
Aufderstraße, H., Bönzli, B., & Lohfert, W. (2005). Themen Neu 3: Lehrwerk für Deutsch als Fremdsprache . Kursbuch. Munich: Hueber.Google Scholar
Aufderstraße, H., Müller, J., & Storz, T. (2005). Lagune 1: KursbuchDeutsch als Fremdsprache . Munich: Hueber.Google Scholar
Berthele, R. (2004). The typology of motion and posture verbs: A variationist account. In B. Kortmann (Ed.), Dialectology meets typology: Dialect grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 93–126). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2006). Ort und Weg: Die sprachliche Raumreferenz in Varietäten des Deutschen, Rätoromanischen und Französischen . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boers, F. (2004). Expanding learners’ vocabulary through metaphor awareness: What expansion, what learners, what vocabulary? In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching (pp. 211–232). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011). Cognitive semantic ways of teaching figurative phrases. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics , 9(1), 227–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., & Demecheleer, M. (1998). A cognitive semantic approach to teaching prepositions. English Language Teaching Journal , 52(3), 197–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Knop, S. (forthc. 2014). Conceptual tools for the description and the acquisition of the German posture verb ‘sitzen’. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory .Google Scholar
De Knop, S., & Dirven, R. (2008). Motion and location events in German, French and English: A typological, contrastive and pedagogical approach. In S. De Knop & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar: A volume in honour of René Dirven (pp. 295–324). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
De Knop, S., & Gallez, F. (2011). Manner of motion: A privileged dimension of German expressions. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics , 2(1), 25–40.Google Scholar
Devos, R., & Fraeters, H. (1998). Vanzelfsprekend: Nederlands voor Anderstaligen . Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
Dirven, R., & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (2010). Looking back at 30 years of Cognitive Linguistics. In E. Tabakowska, M. Choinski & L. Wiraszka (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics in action: From theory to application and back (pp. 13–70). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1997). Second Language Acquisition . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Godin, P., Ostyn, P., & Degreef, F. (1993). La pratique du néerlandais avec ou sans maître . Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters.Google Scholar
Grady, J. (1997). Theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics , 8(4), 267–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griesbach, H. (1984). Deutsch mit Erfolg 2: Ein Lernprogramm für Erwachsene. Lehrbuch für Fortgeschrittene . Berlin/Munich: Langenscheidt.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M. (2009). Reconstructing verb meaning in a second language: How English speakers of L2 Dutch talk and gesture about placement. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics , 71, 221–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henn, C., Vromans, J., & Bijleveld, H. (1996). Pratique du néerlandais de A à Z . Brussels: Didier Hatier.Google Scholar
Ijaz, I. H. (1986). Linguistic and cognitive determinants of lexical acquisition in a second language. Language Learning , 36(4), 401–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jäkel, O. (1989). Der handgreifliche Intellekt: Zur Metaphorik geistiger Tätigkeiten. Grazer Linguistische Studien , 321, 5–19.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason . Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kutscher, S., & Schultze-Berndt, E. (2007). Why a folder lies in the basket although it is not lying: The semantics and use of German positional verbs with inanimate figures. Linguistics , 45(5–6), 983–1028.Google Scholar
Lakoff, J., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by . Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought . New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lemmens, M. (2002). The semantic network of Dutch posture verbs. In J. Newman (Ed.), The linguistics of sitting, standing and lying (pp. 103–139). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemmens, M., & Perrez, J. (2010). On the use of posture verbs by French-speaking learners of Dutch: A corpus-based study. Cognitive Linguistics , 21(2), 315–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012). A quantitative analysis of the use of posture verbs by French-speaking learners of Dutch. CogniTextes , 81. ([URL]).Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, X. (2010). Conceptual Metaphor Theory and teaching of English and Chinese idioms. Journal of Language Teaching and Research , 1(3), 206–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2011). Applying Cognitive Linguistics to second language learning and teaching . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Özçaliskan, S. (2003). Metaphorical motion in crosslinguistic perspective: A comparison of English and Turkish. Metaphor and Symbol , 18(3), 189–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narasimhan, B., & Gullberg, M. (2011). The role of input frequency and semantic transparency in the acquisition of verb meaning: Evidence from placement verbs in Tamil and Dutch. Journal of Child Language , 38(3), 504–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics , 111, 129–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serra Borneto, C. (1995). “Liegen“ and “stehen” in German: A study in horizontality and verticality. In E. Casad (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods (pp. 458–505). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Serra-Borneto, C. (1996). Polarity and metaphor in German. In M. Pütz & R. Dirven (Eds.), The construal of space in language and thought (pp. 373–394). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sonck, G. (2009). Néerlandais: Grammaire de l’étudiant . Brussels: De Boeck.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Grammatical categories and the lexicon , Vol. 3 (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2000). Toward a cognitive semantics . Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wuyts, A. (2007). Nederlands in structuren: Socratische grammatica van het Nederlands . Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Baicchi, Annalisa & Cristiano Broccias
2024. Introduction. In Constructional and Cognitive Explorations of Contrastive Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hermann, Manon
2024. A Contrastive Analysis of Placement Verbs in German and Dutch. In Constructional and Cognitive Explorations of Contrastive Linguistics, ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Andersson, Annika & Marianne Gullberg
2022. First Language Matters: Event-Related Potentials Show Crosslinguistic Influence on the Processing of Placement Verb Semantics. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Gallez, Françoise, Manon Hermann, Françoise Gallez & Manon Hermann
2022. Lexikalisierungsmuster zum Ausdruck der Lokalisierung und Fortbewegung im Deutschen: ein didaktischer Ansatz. In Cognition and Contrast, ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Knop, Sabine De
2020. The embodied teaching of complex verbal constructions with German placement verbs and spatial prepositions. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Koster, Dietha & Teresa Cadierno
2019. The effect of language on recognition memory in first language and second language speakers: The case of placement events. International Journal of Bilingualism 23:2 ► pp. 651 ff. DOI logo
Davis, Joseph
2015. Rule, pattern, and meaning in the second-language teaching of grammar. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 47:1 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.