A constructional approach to transitional formatives
The use of -head in so-called ‘exocentric’ formations
The noun head is commonly found in the second position of many English noun compounds. Typically, noun compounds with head in the right are endocentric formations, that is, composite forms which designate a more specific type of the concept denoted by head (e.g. pinhead). The noun head is also found in a significant number of so called ‘exocentric’ formations with a variety of interconnected meanings (e.g. airhead, acidhead, Potterhead). The different exocentric patterns where head participates raise questions about the grammatical status of this element, which is sometimes analysed as a suffixal element, illustrating the fuzzy boundaries between derivation and compounding. In the linguistic literature there is an extensive debate as to whether processes like this one are to be regarded as cases of grammaticalization or lexicalisation. In this paper it will be proposed that exocentric formations in -head are suitable for an analysis using a schema-based approach in Ryder’s (1994) fashion, or a constructional approach (Booij, 2010a) insofar as new creations arise by analogy with the patterns that can be extracted from existing cases. The different patterns of exocentric formations with head can be conveniently characterized by postulating a hierarchical lexicon with schemas or constructions of different degree of abstraction.
References (40)
Adams, V. (
1973)
An introduction to Modern English word formation
. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (
2007)
Typological distinctions in word-formation. In
T. Shopen (Ed.),
Language typology and syntactic description
, 2nd ed., vol III (pp. 1–65). Cambridge: University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (
1987)
Competition, variation, and language learning. In
B. MacWhinney (Ed.),
Mechanisms of language acquisition
(pp. 157–194). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauer, L. (
1983)
English word-formation
. Cambridge: University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauer, L. (
2008)
Les composés exocentriques de l’anglais [‘English exocentric compounds’]. In
D. Amiot (Ed.),
La composition dans une perspective typologique
(pp. 35–47). Arras: Artois Presses Université.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benczes, R. (
2010)
Setting limits on creativity in the production and use of metaphorical and metonymical compounds. In
A. Onysko &
S. Michel (Eds.),
Cognitive perspectives on word formation
(pp. 219–242). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloomfield, L. (
1935)
Language
. London: Allen & Unwin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, G. (
2005)
Compounding and derivation: evidence for construction morphology. In
W. Dressler,
D. Kastovsky,
O. E. Pfeiffer, &
F. Rainer (Eds.),
Morphology and its demarcations
(pp. 109–132). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, G. (
2010a)
Construction morphology
. Oxford: University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, G. (
2010b)
Compound construction: Schemas or analogy?: A construction morphology perspective. In
S. Scalise &
I. Vogel (Eds.),
Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding
(pp. 93–108). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, G. (
2011)
The rise of word-level constructional idioms as a type of word formation change.
Paper presented at the Leiden University Centre for Linguistics (LUCL) Colloquium
28 October 20111.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, G. (
2013)
Morphology in Construction Grammar. In
T. Hoffmann &
G. Trousdale (Eds.),
The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar
(pp. 255–273). Oxford: University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, G
(forthcoming).
Construction morphology. In
A. Spencer &
A. Zwicky (Eds.),
Handbook of Morphology
.
2nd edition. London: Blackwell. Retrieved at
[URL].
Booij, G., & Hüning, M. (
2012)
From compound to derivation: Affixoids and the rise of derivational affixes through ‘constructionalization’.
Paper presented at the workshop ‘Refining grammaticalization’, Freie Universität Berlin, 24
–
25 February 20121.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, G., Lehmann, C., & Mudgan, J. (
Eds) (
2000)
Morphologie. Ein internationals Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung / Morphology. An international handbook on inflection and word formation
(in collaboration with W. Kesselheim and S. Skopeteas). Vol 11. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brinton, L. J., & Traugott, E. C. (
2005)
Lexicalization and language change
. Cambridge: University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Plag, I. (
2000)
Category-wise, some compound-type morphemes seem to be rather suffix-like: On the status of -ful, -type and -wise in present-day English.
Folia Linguistica
, 341, 225–244.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (
2002)
The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities
. New York: Basic Books.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hatcher, A. G. (
1960)
An introduction to the analysis of English noun compounds.
Word
, 161, 356–373.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (
Eds) (
2002)
The Cambridge grammar of the English language
. Cambridge: University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, R. S. (
2002)
Foundations of language
. Oxford: University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, R. S. (
2009)
Compounding in the parallel architecture and conceptual semantics. In
R. Lieber &
P. Stekauer (Eds.),
The Oxford handbook of compounding
(pp. 105–129). Oxford: University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jespersen, O. (
1909–1949)
A modern English grammar on historical principles
I–VII. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kühnhold, I., Putzer, O., & Wellmann, H. (
1978)
Deutsche Wortbildung
, Vol. III1: Das Adjektiv. Düsseldorf: Schwann.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lamb, S. M. (
1998)
Pathways of the brain: The neurocognitive basis of language
. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, R. W. (
1987)
Foundations of Cognitive Grammar
, Volume I1: Theoretical prerequisites. Standford CA: Standford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, R. W. (
1999)
Grammar and conceptualization
. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levi, J. N. (
1978)
The syntax and semantics of complex nominals
. New York: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Libben, G. (
2006)
Why study compound processing?: An overview of the issues. In
G. Libben &
G. Jarema (Eds.),
The representation and processing of compound words
(pp. 1– 22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malkiel, Y. (
1978)
Derivational categories. In
J. H. Greenberg (Ed.),
Universals of human language. Vol III: Word structure
(pp. 125–149). Standford California: University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marchand, H. (
1969)
The categories and types of present day English word formation
. Munich: C. H. Beck.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plag, I. (
2003)
Word-formation in English
. Cambridge: University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (
1985)
A comprehensive grammar of the English language
. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ryder, M. E. (
1994)
Ordered chaos: The interpretation of English noun-noun compounds
.
Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmidt, G. D. (
1987)
Das affixoid: Zur Notwendigkeit und Brauchbarkeit eines beliebten Zwischenbegriffs der Wortbildung. In
G. Hoppe,
A. Kirkness,
E. Link,
I. Nortmeyer,
W. Rettig, &
G. Schmidt (Eds.),
Deutsche Lehnwortbildung
(pp. 53–101). Tübingen: Narr.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selkirk, E. O. (
1982)
The syntax of words
. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, E. (
1981)
On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word’.
Linguistic Inquiry
, 121, 245–274.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.