Article published in:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 12:1 (2014) ► pp. 160192
References

References

Adams, V.. (
1973)  An introduction to Modern English word formation . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, A. Y.. (
2007) Typological distinctions in word-formation. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description , 2nd ed., vol III (pp. 1–65). Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Barcelona, A.. (
2008) The interaction of metonymy and metaphor in the meaning and form of ‘bahuvrihi’ compounds. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics , 6, 208–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B.. (
1987) Competition, variation, and language learning. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 157–194). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bauer, L.. (
1983)  English word-formation . Cambridge: University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008) Les composés exocentriques de l’anglais [‘English exocentric compounds’]. In D. Amiot (Ed.), La composition dans une perspective typologique (pp. 35–47). Arras: Artois Presses Université.Google Scholar
Benczes, R.. (
2006)  Creative compounding in English: The semantics of metaphorical and metonymical noun-noun combinations . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010) Setting limits on creativity in the production and use of metaphorical and metonymical compounds. In A. Onysko & S. Michel (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on word formation (pp. 219–242). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, L.. (
1935)  Language . London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Booij, G.. (
2005) Compounding and derivation: evidence for construction morphology. In W. Dressler, D. Kastovsky, O. E. Pfeiffer, & F. Rainer (Eds.), Morphology and its demarcations (pp. 109–132). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010a)  Construction morphology . Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
2010b) Compound construction: Schemas or analogy?: A construction morphology perspective. In S. Scalise & I. Vogel (Eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding (pp. 93–108). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011) The rise of word-level constructional idioms as a type of word formation change. Paper presented at the Leiden University Centre for Linguistics (LUCL) Colloquium 28 October 2011.Google Scholar
2013) Morphology in Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 255–273). Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
Booij, G.
(forthcoming). Construction morphology. In A. Spencer & A. Zwicky (Eds.), Handbook of Morphology . 2nd edition. London: Blackwell. Retrieved at http://​www​.hum2​.
leidenuniv​.nl​/booijge​/publicaties​.htm.
Booij, G., & Hüning, M.. (
2012) From compound to derivation: Affixoids and the rise of derivational affixes through ‘constructionalization’. Paper presented at the workshop ‘Refining grammaticalization’, Freie Universität Berlin, 24 25 February 2012.Google Scholar
Booij, G., Lehmann, C., & Mudgan, J.. (
Eds) (2000)  Morphologie. Ein internationals Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung / Morphology. An international handbook on inflection and word formation (in collaboration with W. Kesselheim and S. Skopeteas). Vol 1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, L. J., & Traugott, E. C.. (
2005)  Lexicalization and language change . Cambridge: University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Plag, I.. (
2000) Category-wise, some compound-type morphemes seem to be rather suffix-like: On the status of -ful, -type and -wise in present-day English. Folia Linguistica , 34, 225–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.. (
2002)  The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities . New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hatcher, A. G.. (
1960) An introduction to the analysis of English noun compounds. Word , 16, 356–373.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K.. (
Eds) (2002)  The Cambridge grammar of the English language . Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S.. (
2002)  Foundations of language . Oxford: University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009) Compounding in the parallel architecture and conceptual semantics. In R. Lieber & P. Stekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 105–129). Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O.. (
1909–1949)  A modern English grammar on historical principles I–VII. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Kühnhold, I., Putzer, O., & Wellmann, H.. (
1978)  Deutsche Wortbildung , Vol. III: Das Adjektiv. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar
Lamb, S. M.. (
1998)  Pathways of the brain: The neurocognitive basis of language . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.. (
1987)  Foundations of Cognitive Grammar , Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Standford CA: Standford University Press.Google Scholar
1999)  Grammar and conceptualization . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levi, J. N.. (
1978)  The syntax and semantics of complex nominals . New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Libben, G.. (
2006) Why study compound processing?: An overview of the issues. In 
G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 1– 22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Y.. (
1978) Derivational categories. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language. Vol III: Word structure (pp. 125–149). Standford California: University Press.Google Scholar
Marchand, H.. (
1969)  The categories and types of present day English word formation . Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Noël, D.. (
2007) Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language , 14(2), 177–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plag, I.. (
2003)  Word-formation in English . Cambridge: University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.. (
1985)  A comprehensive grammar of the English language . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ryder, M. E.. (
1994)  Ordered chaos: The interpretation of English noun-noun compounds . 
Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, G. D.. (
1987) Das affixoid: Zur Notwendigkeit und Brauchbarkeit eines beliebten Zwischenbegriffs der Wortbildung. In G. Hoppe, A. Kirkness, E. Link, I. Nortmeyer, W. Rettig, & G. Schmidt (Eds.), Deutsche Lehnwortbildung (pp. 53–101). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O.. (
1982)  The syntax of words . Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Williams, E.. (
1981) On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word’. Linguistic Inquiry , 12, 245–274.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Portero-Muñoz, Carmen
2018.  In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60],  pp. 261 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.