Article published In:
Review of Cognitive LinguisticsVol. 12:2 (2014) ► pp.375–409
The two-Mover hypothesis and the significance of “direction of motion” in temporal metaphors
It is claimed that expressions that instantiate sequence is relative position on a path (e.g. Spring follows winter) are the only type of temporal expression in English in which two distinct entities metaphorically move. A possible motivation for why we do not find two Times-as-Movers going the opposite “direction” may be that people are not disposed to tracking two “nows”. It is further hypothesized that this could be a crosslinguistically common or universal tendency, and data relevant to the constraint are discussed for Japanese and Wolof (West Africa). This exercise documents and categorizes certain semantic relations (such as ahead/behind) that are relevant to the study of direction of motion in metaphors of time.
Keywords: mental spaces, Japanese, Wolof, temporal metaphor, frames of reference, space, time, metonymy, front, back, behind, blending, conceptual mappings
References
Bender, A., Beller, S., & Bennardo, G
(2010) Temporal frames of reference: Conceptual analysis and empirical evidence from German, English, Mandarin Chinese, and Tongan. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 101, 283–307. 
Bühler, K
Clark, H
(1973) Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T.E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.
Cutrer, M
(1994) Time and tense in narratives and everyday language. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California at San Diego.
Einstein, A
(1961) Relativity: The special and the general theory. [Translated by Robert W. Lawson.] New York: Three Rivers Press.
Evans, V
(2013) Language and time: A cognitive linguistics approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G
(1994/1985) Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1997) Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M
(2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Fillmore, C
(1982) Towards a descriptive framework for spatial deixis. In R. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics (pp. 31–59). Chinchester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
(1997/1971) Lectures on deixis. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Grady, J
(1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California at Berkeley.
(1999) A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance. In R. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 79–100).
Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2005) Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 371, 1595–1614.
Hanks, W
(1990) Referential practice: Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hill, C
(1978) Linguistic representation of spatial and temporal orientation. In J. Jaeger,
A. Woodbury, F. Ackerman, C. Chiarello, O. Gensler, J. Kingston, E. Sweetser,
H. Thompson & K. Whistler (Eds.),
Proceedings of the fourth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society
(pp. 524–538).
Hutchins, E
(2005) Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 371, 1555–1577.
Lakoff, G
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M
(1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Levinson, S.C
(2003) Space in language and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Liddell, S
(2003) Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
McTaggart, J.M.E
(1908) The unreality of time. Mind, 171, 456–473.
Moore, K.E
(2006) Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics, 171, 199–244.
(2011) Ego-perspective and field-based frames of reference: temporal meanings of front in Japanese, Wolof, and Aymara. Journal of Pragmatics, 431, 759–776.
(2014) The spatial language of time: Metaphor, metonymy and frames of reference. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Newton, I
(1686) Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica. London: Royal Society.
Núñez, R
(1999) Could the future taste purple? Reclaiming mind, body, and cognition. In R. Núñez & W.J. Freeman (Eds.), Reclaiming cognition: The primacy of action, intention, and emotion (pp. 41–60). Thorverton, UK: Imprint Academic.
Ohara, K
. (Kyoko Hirose Ohara) (1991) Extensions of mae and saki from space to time. UC Berkeley: Unpublished.
Shinohara, K., & Matsunaka, Y
(2010) Frames of reference, effects of motion, and lexical meanings of Japanese front/back terms. In V. Evans & P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, cognition, and culture: The state of the art and new directions (pp. 293–315). London: Equinox.
Shinohara, K., & Pardeshi, P
(2011) The more in front, the later: The role of positional terms in time metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 431, 749–758.
Svorou, S
Talmy, L
(2000) Toward a cognitive semantics: Volume 1, Concept structuring systems.
Cambridge: MIT Press.
Tenbrink, T
(2011) Reference frames of space and time in language. Journal of Pragmatics, 431, 704–722.
Traugott, E.C
(1975) Spatial expressions of tense and temporal sequencing: A contribution to the study of semantic fields. Semiotica, 151, 207–230.
Yamaguchi, T
(2012) The semantic change of ato ‘later, behind’ in Japanese: From the Peircean sign to metonymy. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 131, 72–109.
Yu, N
(2012) The metaphorical orientation of time in Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 441, 1335–1354.
Cited by
Cited by 12 other publications
de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J. Ruiz & María Asunción Barreras Gómez
2015. Time and Cognition in Marvell’s “To his Coy Mistress”. Cognitive Semantics 1:2 ► pp. 241 ff. 
Huumo, Tuomas
2015. Temporal frames of reference and the locative case marking of the Finnish adposition ete- ‘in front of / ahead’. Lingua 164 ► pp. 45 ff.
Huumo, Tuomas
2017. The grammar of temporal motion: A Cognitive Grammar account of motion metaphors of time. Cognitive Linguistics 28:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
HUUMO, TUOMAS
2018. Moving along paths in space and time. Journal of Linguistics 54:4 ► pp. 721 ff.
Huumo, Tuomas
2019. Why Monday is not in front of Tuesday: On the uses of English and Finnish front adpositions in sequence metaphors of time
. Linguistics 57:3 ► pp. 607 ff.
Huumo, Tuomas & Krista Teeri-Niknammoghadam
2022. Chapter 12. Moving reader or moving text?. In Analogy and Contrast in Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 73], ► pp. 371 ff.
MOORE, KEVIN EZRA
2017. Elaborating time in space: the structure and function of space–motion metaphors of time. Language and Cognition 9:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
2017. Conceptual complexes in cognitive modeling. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:1 ► pp. 299 ff.
Vesić Pavlović, Tijana
2018. The role of path metaphors in conceptualising life in English and Serbian: a corpus-based analysis. Brno studies in English :1 ► pp. [63] ff.
Yang, Yongfei, Chris Sinha & Luna Filipovic
2023. Sequential Time construal is primary in temporal uses of Mandarin Chinese qian ‘front’ and hou ‘back’. Language Sciences 95 ► pp. 101511 ff.
Zhong, Lingli & Zhengguang Liu
2022. Metonymic event-based time interval concepts in Mandarin Chinese—Evidence from time interval words. Frontiers in Psychology 13
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.