“Cognitive Linguistics is fun”
An interview with Günter Radden
References (63)
Ausubel, D
(
1963)
The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune and Stratton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benczes, R., Barcelona, A., & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J
Bierwiaczonek, B
(
2013)
Metonymy in language, thought and brain. Sheffield: Equinox.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolinger, D
(
1980)
Language: The loaded weapon. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brdar, M., & Brdar Szabó, R
Cuyckens, H., Berg, T., Dirven, R., & Panther, K.-U
Denroche, C
(
2015)
Metonymy in language: A new theory of linguistic processing. New York: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deutscher, G
(
2010)
The new linguistic relativism in the NY Times.
[URL]. Last accessed: April 2015.
Dirven, R., & Geiger, R.A
(Eds.) (
1989)
A user’s grammar of English: Word, sentence, text, interaction. Frankfurt/Main: Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dirven, R., Hünig, W., Kühlwein, W., Radden, G., & Strauß, J
(
1976)
Die Leistung der Linguistik für den Englischunterricht. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dirven, R., & Radden, G
(
1977)
Semantische Syntax des Englischen. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dirven, R., & Radden, G
(Eds.) (
1981)
Kasusgrammatik und Fremdsprachendidaktik. Trier: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dirven, R., & Radden, G
(Eds.) (
1987a)
Issues in the theory of Universal Grammar. Tübingen: Narr.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dirven, R., & Radden, G
(Eds.) (
1987b)
Concepts of case. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, R.W
(
1991)
The poetics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gomila, A
2015).
Language and thought: The neo-Whorfian hypothesis. In
J.D. Wight (Ed.)
The international encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences pp. 293 299 2nd edition. Oxford Elsevier
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Górska, E., & Radden, G
(Eds.) (
2006)
Metaphor–metonymy collage. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hamilton, J.O.C
(
2010)
You say up, I say yesterday.
Stanford Magazine,
May/June.
[URL].
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Humboldt, W
(
1836)
Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihr Einfluß auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: Dümmlers.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G
(
1998)
Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view.
Cognitive Linguistics, 91, 37–77.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kronasser, H
(
1968)
Handbuch der Semasiologie. Heidelberg: Winter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G
(
1990)
The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G
(
1993)
The contemporary theory of metaphor. In
A. Ortony (Ed.),
Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M
(
1980)
Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, R.W
(
2009)
Metonymic grammar. In
K.-U. Panther,
L. Thornburg, &
A. Barcelona (Eds.),
Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp. 45–71). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Niemeier, S
(
2008)
The notion of boundedness/unboundedness in the foreign language classroom. In
F. Boers &
S. Lindstromberg (Eds.),
Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 309–327). Berlin: Mounton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nikiforidou, K
(
1999)
Nominalizations, metonymy and lexicographic practice. In
L. de Stadler &
C. Eyrich (Eds.),
Issues in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 141–163). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Panther, K.-U., & Radden, G
Panther, K.-U., & Radden, G
Panther, K.-U., Thornburg, L., & Barcelona, A
Peirsman, Y., & Geeraerts, D
(
2006)
Metonymy as a prototypical category.
Cognitive Linguistics, 171, 369–316.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G
(
1989a)
Semantic roles. In
R. Dirven &
R.A. Geiger (Eds.),
A user’s grammar of English: Word, sentence, text, interaction (pp. 421–272). Frankfurt/Main: Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G
(
1989b)
Figurative use of prepositions. In
R. Dirven &
R.A. Geiger (Eds.),
A user’s grammar of English: Word, sentence, text, interaction (pp. 551–576). Frankfurt/Main: Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G
(
2004a)
The metonymic folk model of language. In
B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk &
A. Kwiatkowska (Eds.),
Imagery in language: Festschrift in honour of Professor Ronald W. Langacker (pp. 543–565). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G
(
2004b)
The metaphor time as space across languages. In
N. Baumarten,
C. Böttger,
M. Motz, &
J. Probst (Eds.),
Übersetzen, Interkulturelle Kommunikation, Spracherwerb und Sprachvermittlung – das Leben mit mehreren Sprachen: Festschrift für Juliane House zum 60 (pp. 225–238). Geburtstag. Bochum: AKS-Verlag.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G
(
2005).
Accessing generic referents by metonymy. In
A.J. Schuth,
K. Horner, &
J. J. Weber (Eds.),
Life in language: Studies in honour of Wolfgang Kühlwein (pp. 121–133). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G
(
2006a)
Where time meets space. In
R. Benczes &
S. Csábi (Eds.),
The metaphors of sixty: Papers presented on the occasion of the 60th birthday of Zoltán Kövecses (pp. 210–226). Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G
(
2006b)
The metaphor time as space across languages. In
E. Górska &
G. Radden (Eds.),
Metonymy-metaphor collage (pp. 99–120). Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G
(
2007)
Interaction of modality and negation. In
W. Chłopicki,
A. Pawelec, &
A. Pokojska (Eds.),
Cognition in language: Volume in honour of Professor Elżbieta Tabakowska (pp. 224–254). Krakow: Tertium.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G
(
2009a)
Affirmative and negated modality. In
M.A. Olivares &
E. Llácer (Eds.),
Nuevas perspectivas en Lingüistica Cognitiva/New perspectives in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 169–192). Valencia: Universitat de València.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G
(
2011)
Spatial time in the West and the East. In
M. Brdar,
M. Omazic,
V. Pavičić Takač,
T. Gradečak-Erdeljić, &
G. Buljan (Eds.),
Space and time in language (pp. 1–40). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G., & Cuyckens, H
(Eds.) (
2002)
Perspectives on prepositions. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G., & Dirven, R
(
1999)
The cognitive basis of language: Language and thought. In
R. Dirven &
M. Verspoor (Eds.),
Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics (pp. 1–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G., Dirven, R., & Verspoor, M
(
1999)
Putting concepts together: Syntax. In
R. Dirven &
M. Verspoor (Eds.),
Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics (pp. 79–105). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G., Köpcke, K.-M., Berg, T., & Siemund, P
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z
(
1999)
Towards a theory of metonymy. In
K.-U. Panther &
G. Radden (Eds.),
Metonymy in language and lhought (pp. 17–59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z
(
2007)
Towards a theory of metonymy. In
V. Evans,
B.K. Bergen, &
J. Zinken (Eds.),
The Cognitive Linguistics reader (pp. 335–359). London: Equinox.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G., & Matthis, E
(
2002)
Why similar to but different from? In
H. Cuyckens &
G. Radden (Eds.),
Perspectives on prepositions (pp. 231–255). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G., & Panther, K.-U
(Eds.) (
2004a)
Studies in linguistic motivation. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G., & Panther, K.-U
(
2004b)
Introduction: Reflections on motivation. In
G. Radden &
K.-U. Panther (Eds.),
Studies in linguistic motivation (pp. 1–46). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G., & Panther, K.-U
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J
(
2000)
The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In
A. Barcelona (Ed.),
Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 109–132). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ullman, S
(
1962)
Semantics: An introduction to the science of meaning. New York: Barnes & Noble.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whorf, B.L
(
1939)
The relation of habitual thought and behavior to language. In
L. Spier (Ed.),
Language, culture, and personality (pp. 75–93). Menasha, WI: Sapir Memorial Fund.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zerubavel, A
(
1991)
The fine line: Making distinctions in everyday life. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Ma, Chenting & Yi-na Wang
2019.
Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & Alicia Galera Masegosa,Cognitive modeling: A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 2014. Pp. x + 250..
Journal of Linguistics 55:2
► pp. 462 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.