Article published in:
Applying Cognitive Linguistics: Figurative language in use, constructions and typology
Edited by Ana M. Piquer-Píriz and Rafael Alejo-González
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:1] 2016
► pp. 73–101

Methodological triangulation in the study of emotion

The case of ‘anger’ in three language groups

| Swiss Center for the Affective Sciences
| Swiss Center for the Affective Sciences
| University of Brighton
This paper explores the value of Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) in the interdisciplinary study of emotion. The insights provided by a quantitative, corpus-based analysis of anger metaphors in three languages (English, Spanish, Russian) are compared to those obtained from two other methodologies of a more psycholinguistic kind: a feature-rating and a labelling task. The three methodologies are used to test in language several hypotheses on cross-cultural differences in anger experiences derived from earlier findings in emotion psychology. The three methods are found to be complementary and provide convergent evidence that support the hypotheses, with each method contributing additional pertinent data on some of the issues addressed. We discuss the contribution of CMT, its relative importance and specificity, and highlight several methodological and analytical adaptations that CMT studies should undergo for its results to become informative to other disciplines in the study of emotion.
Keywords: emotion, English, Russian, Spanish, anger, conceptual metaphor, Cognitive Linguistics, cross-cultural psychology
Published online: 07 July 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.14.1.04oga
References
Apresyan, V., & Apresyan, Y.
(1993) Metafora v semanticheskon predstavlenii emotsij’. [Metaphor in the semantic representation of emotions]. Vopsory Yazykoznaniya, 3, 27–35.Google Scholar
Barcelona, A.
(1986) On the concept of depression in American English: A cognitive approach. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 12, 7–35.Google Scholar
(1995) Metaphorical models of romantic love in Romeo and Juliet . Journal of Pragmatics, 24(6), 667–688. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beger, A., & Jäkel, O.
(2009) Anger, love and sadness revisited: Differences in emotion metaphors between experts and laypersons in the genre psychology guides. metaphorik.de, 16, 87–108.Google Scholar
Bender, A., Spada, H., Rothe-Wulf, A., Traber, S., & Rauss, K.
(2012) Anger elicitation in Tonga and Germany: The impact of culture on cognitive determinants of emotions. Frontiers in Psychology: Cultural Psychology, 5, 1–20.Google Scholar
Boster, J.S.
(2005) Emotion categories across languages. In C. LeFebvre & H. Cohen (Eds.), Categorization in the cognitive sciences (pp. 187–222). Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C., Lee, S., & Stevenson, H.W.
(1995) Response style and cross-cultural comparison of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Science, 6(3), 170–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chon, K.K., Kim, K.H., & Ryoo, J.B.
(2000) Experience and expression of anger in Korea and America. Korean Journal of Rehabilitation Psychology, 7(1), 61–75.Google Scholar
Ekman, P.
(1999) Basic emotions. In T. Dalgleish & M. Power (Eds.), A handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 45–60). Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Elison, J.
(2005) Shame and guilt: A hundred years of apples and oranges. New Ideas in Psychology, 23(1), 5–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández, I., Carrera, P., Sánchez, F., Páez, D., & Candia, L.
(2000) Differences between cultures in emotional verbal and non-verbal reactions. Psicothema, suppl., 12, 83–92.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J., Scherer, K., & Soriano, C.
(Eds.) (2013) Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D., & Grondelaers, S.
(1995) Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In J.R. Taylor & R.E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the world (pp. 153–179). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, E.
(1985) Rage and obligation: Samoan emotion in conflict. In G.M. White & J. Kirkpatrick (Eds.), Person, self, and experience: Exploring Pacific ethnopsychologies (pp. 121–167). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Glynn, D.
(2002) Love and anger: The grammatical structure of conceptual metaphors. Style, 36, 541–559.Google Scholar
Grazzani-Gavazzi, I., & Oatley, K.
(1999) The experience of emotions of interdependence and independence following interpersonal errors in Italy and Anglophone Canada. Cognition and Emotion, 13(1), 49–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G.
(2001) Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hupka, R.B., Lenton, A.P., & Hutchison, K.A.
(1999) Universal development of emotion categories in natural language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(2), 247–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, F.A.
(1993) Dependency and Japanese socialization. New York, N.Y.: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(1986) Metaphors of anger, pride, and love: A lexical approach to the study of concepts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1990) Emotion concepts. Berlin/New York, N.Y.: Springer-Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Metaphor and emotion. New York/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krawczak, K.
(2014) Shame, embarrassment and guilt: Corpus evidence for the cross-cultural structure of social emotions. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 50(4), 441–475. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z.
(1987) The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 195–221). New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, R.S.
(1991) Emotion and adaptation. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, R.
(1973) Tahitians. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lutz, C.
(1982) The domain of emotion words on Ifaluk. American Ethnologist, 9, 113–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1988) Unnatural emotions: Everyday sentiments on a Micronesian atoll and their challenge to western theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, F.
(1979) Readings on Philippine values. Quezon City, Philippines: Institute of Philippine Culture, Ateneo de Manila University Press.Google Scholar
Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S.
(1991) Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, D., & Ekman, P.
(1989) American-Japanese cultural differences in intensity ratings of facial expressions of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 13, 143–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S.H., & Chung, J.
(2010) The expression of anger across cultures. In M. Potegal, G. Stemmler, & C. Spielberger (Eds.), International handbook of anger: Constituent and concomitant biological, psychological, and social processes (pp. 125–138). New York, N.Y.: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mortillaro, M., Ricci-Bitti, P.E., Bellelli, G., & Galati, D.
(2013) Pride is not created equal: Variations between Northern and Southern Italy. In J. Fontaine, K.R. Scherer, & C. Soriano (Eds.), Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook (pp. 366–376). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A.
(2006) Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 23–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, R.E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A.
(2001) Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ogarkova, A., Prihod’ko, I., & Zakharova, J.
(2013) Emotion terms semantics in Russian-Ukrainian and Ukrainian-Russian bilinguals. In J. Fontaine, K.R. Scherer, & C. Soriano (Eds.), Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook (pp. 490–495). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ogarkova, A., & Soriano, C.
(2014a) Variation within universals: The metaphorical profile approach and anger concepts in English, Russian, and Spanish. In A. Mussolf, F. MacArthur, & G. Pagani (Eds.), Metaphor in intercultural communication (pp. 93–116). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2014b) Emotion and the body: A corpus-driven investigation of metaphorical containers of anger across languages. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 5(2), 147–179.Google Scholar
Ogarkova, A., Soriano, C., & Lehr, C.
(2012) Naming feeling: Exploring the equivalence of emotion terms in five European languages. Lodz Studies in Language, 27, 253–284.Google Scholar
Ortony, A., Clore, G.L., & Collins, A.
(1988) The cognitive structure of emotions. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortony, A., & Turner, T.
(1990) What’s basic about basic emotions? Psychological Review, 97, 315–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, K.R.
(2009) The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the Component Process Model. Cognition and Emotion, 23(7), 1307–1351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, K.R., Wallbott, H.G., & Summerfield, A.B.
(1986) Experiencing emotion: A crosscultural study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shweder, R.A., & Haidt, R.
(2000) The cultural psychology of the emotions: Ancient and new. In M. Lewis & J.M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd edition, pp. 397–414). New York, N.Y.: Guildford.Google Scholar
Soriano, C.
(2005)  The conceptualization of anger in English and Spanish: A cognitive approach . Doctoral dissertation. University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
(2013) Conceptual Metaphor Theory and the GRID paradigm in the study of anger in English and Spanish. In J. Fontaine, K.R. Scherer, & C. Soriano (Eds.), Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook (pp. 410–424). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Soriano, C., Fontaine, J., Ogarkova, A., Mejia, C., Volkova, Y., Ionova, S., & Shakhovskyy, V.
(2013) Semantic types of anger in Spanish and Russian. In J. Fontaine, K.R. Scherer, & C. Soriano (Eds.), Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook (pp.339–352). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Soriano, C., & Ogarkova, A.
submitted). Metaphorical profile analysis in the study of anger: A new method and a new model.
Stefanowitsch, A.
(2006) Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 61–105). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stipek, D., Weiner, B., & Li, K.
(1989) Testing some attribution-emotional relations in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 109–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J.R., & Mbense, T.G.
(1998) Red dogs and rotten mealies: How Zulus talk about anger. In A. Athanasiadou & E. Tabakowska (Eds.), Speaking of emotions: Conceptualisation and expression (pp. 191–226). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tissari, H.
(2006) Conceptualizing shame: Investigating uses of the English word shame, 1418–1991. In R.W. McConchie, O. Timofeeva, H. Tissari, & T. Säily (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2005 Symposium on New Approaches in English Historical Lexis (HEL-LEX) (pp. 143–154). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Triandis, H.C.
(1994) Major cultural syndromes and emotion. In S. Kitayama & H.R. Markus (Eds.), Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence (pp. 285–303). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wallbott, H.G., & Scherer, K.R.
(1988) Emotion and economic development: Data and speculations concerning the relationships between economic factors and emotional experience. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 267–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ward, B.E.
(1970) Temper tantrums in Kau Sai: Some speculations upon their effects. In P. Mayer (Ed.), Socialization: The approach from Social Anthropology (pp. 109–124). London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Wranik, T., & Scherer, K.R.
(2010) Why do I get angry?: A componential appraisal approach. In M. Potegal, G. Stemmler, & C. Spielberger (Eds.), International handbook of anger: Constituent and concomitant biological, psychological, and social processes (pp. 243–266). New York, N.Y.: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yrizarry, N., Matsumoto, D., & Wilson-Cohn, C.
(1998) American–Japanese differences in multiscalar intensity ratings of universal facial expressions of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 22, 315–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yu, N.
(1995) Metaphorical expressions of anger and happiness in English and Chinese. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(2), 59–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Alba-Juez, Laura & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
2019.  In Emotion in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 302], ► pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Ogarkova, Anna
2021.  In Emotion Measurement, ► pp. 909 ff. Crossref logo
Soares da Silva, Augusto
2021.  In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 387 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.