Article published in:
Applying Cognitive Linguistics: Figurative language in use, constructions and typology
Edited by Ana M. Piquer-Píriz and Rafael Alejo-González
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:1] 2016
► pp. 105135
References
Allan, L.G.
(1980) A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 147–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allport, D., & Funnell, E.
(1981) Components of the mental lexicon. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 295(1077), 397–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J.R.
(1983) A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22(3), 261–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Cognitive psychology and its implications (7th edition). New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
Arnon, I., & Snider, N.
(2010) More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 67–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Audacity Team
(2014) Audacity (Version 2.0.2): http://​audacity​.sourceforge​.net/.
Baayen, R.H., Feldman, L.B., & Schreuder, R.
(2006) Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 290–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Balota, D., Cortese, M., Sergent-Marshall, S.D., Spieler, D., & Yap, M.
(2004) Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 283–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Balota, D., Ferraro, F., & Connor, L.
(1991) On the early influence of meaning in word recognition: A review of the literature. In P.J. Schwanenflugel (Ed.), The psychology of word meanings (pp. 187–222). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L.W.
(2010) Ad hoc categories. In P.C. Hogan (Ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences (pp. 87–88). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bencini, G.M.L., & Goldberg, A.
(2000) The contribution of argument structure constructions to sentence meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 640–651. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bod, R.
(2001) Sentence memory: Storage vs. computation of frequent sentences. Paper presented at the CUNY-2001, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Brown, S.
(2014) xACT 2.22.Google Scholar
Catlin, J.
(1973) In defense of sophisticated-guessing theory. Psychological Review, 80, 412–416. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, J.M.
(1886) The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 11, 63–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M.
(2004–) BYU-BNC: The British National Corpus available online at http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/bnc.
(2008–) The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990–present. Available online at http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coca/.Google Scholar
de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V.
(2010) Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J.P.
(2011) Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron Review, 70, 200–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Durrant, P., & Doherty, A.
(2010) Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real? Investigating the thesis of collocational priming. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 6, 125–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ebbinghaus, H.
(1885) Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (trans. by H.A. Ruger & C.E. Bussenius [1913]) New York: Teachers College, Columbia.Google Scholar
Ellis, N.C.
(Ed.) (1994) Implicit and explicit learning of languages. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1996) Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(1), 91–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Memory for language. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 33–68). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006a) Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006b) Selective attention and transfer phenomena in SLA: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned-attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In P. Robinson & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 372–405). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2012) Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 17–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
in press). On-line processing of verb-argument constructions: Lexical decision and semantic processing. Language and Cognition.
Ellis, N.C., & Ferreira-Junior, F.
(2009) Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 111–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N.C., Frey, E., & Jalkanen, I.
(2009) The psycholinguistic reality of collocation and semantic prosody (1): Lexical access. In U. Römer & R. Schulze (Eds.), Exploring the lexis-grammar interface (pp. 89–114). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H.
(2009) Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ellis, N.C., & O’Donnell, M.B.
(2011) Robust language acquisition: An emergent consequence of language as a complex adaptive system. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3512–3517). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
(2012) Statistical construction learning: Does a Zipfian problem space ensure robust language learning? In J. Rebuschat & J. Williams (Eds.), Statistical learning and language acquisition (pp. 265–304). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ellis, N.C., O’Donnell, M.B., & Römer, U.
(2012) Usage-based language: Investigating the latent structures that underpin acquisition. Currents in Language Learning, 1, 25–51.Google Scholar
(2014) The processing of Verb-Argument Constructions is sensitive to form, function, frequency, contingency, and prototypicality. Cognitive Linguistics, 25, 55–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N.C., & Ogden, D.C.
(2015) Language cognition. Journal of Child Language, 42, 182–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forster, K.I., & Chambers, S.
(1973) Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627–635. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J.
(2003) Effect displays in R for generalised linear models. Journal of Statistical Software, 8(15), 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Francis, G., Hunston, S., & Manning, E.
(Eds.) (1996) Grammar patterns 1: Verbs. The COBUILD series. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.E.
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.E., & Bencini, G.M.L.
(2005) Support from processing for a constructional approach to grammar. In A.E. Tyler, M. Takada, Y. Kim, & D. Marinova (Eds.), Language in use: Cognitive and discourse perspectives on language and language learning (pp. 3–18). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Gries, S.T., & Ellis, N.C.
(2015) Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics. Currents in Language Learning, 2, 228–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S.T., & Wulff, S.
(2005) Do foreign language learners also have constructions?: Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 182–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harnad, S.
(Ed.) (1987) Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Howes, D.H., & Solomon, R.L.
(1951) Visual duration threshold as a function of word-probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41(6), 401–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
(1987) The competition model. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 249–308). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Marcel, A.J.
(1983) Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 15(2), 197–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., & De Vleeschauwer, J.
(2012) Prompt type frequency, auditory pattern discrimination, and EFL learners’ production of wh-questions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 355–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, D.E., & Schvaneveldt, R.W.
(1971) Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G.A.
(2009) WordNet: About us. Retrieved March 1, 2010, from Princeton University http://​wordnet​.princeton​.edu
Miller, G.A., & Selfridge, J.A.
(1950) Verbal context and the recall of meaningful material. The American Journal of Psychology, 63, 176–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morton, J.
(1969) Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76(2), 165–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, J.W.
(2007) PsychoPy: Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1), 8–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team
(2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Rescorla, R.A.
(1968) Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 66, 1–5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N.C.
(Eds.) (2008) Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Römer, U., O’Donnell, M.B., & Ellis, N.C.
(2015) Using COBUILD grammar patterns for a large-scale analysis of verb-argument constructions: Exploring corpus data and speaker knowledge. In M. Charles, N. Groom, & S. John (Eds.), Corpora, grammar, text and discourse: In honour of Susan Hunston (pp. 43–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C.B.
(1975) Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M., & Boyes-Braem, P.
(1976) Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N.
(2010) The cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M.S., & McClelland, J.L.
(1989a) A distributed, developmental model of word acquisition. Psychological Review, 94, 523–568. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1989b) A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, D.R.
(1995) The psychology of associative learning. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, E.L., & Lorge, I.
(1944) The teacher’s book of 30,000 words. New York: Teacher’s College.Google Scholar
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C.
(2011) Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall casks. Language Learning, 61(2), 569–613. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, G., & Hoffmann, T.
(Eds.) (2013) Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zipf, G.K.
(1935) The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

ELLIS, NICK C.
2016. Online processing of Verb–Argument Constructions: lexical decision and meaningfulness. Language and Cognition 8:3  pp. 391 ff. Crossref logo
Ellis, Nick C. & Dave C. Ogden
2017. Thinking About Multiword Constructions: Usage-Based Approaches to Acquisition and Processing. Topics in Cognitive Science 9:3  pp. 604 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.