On-line processing of verb-argument constructions
Visual recognition threshold and naming latency
Ellis, O’Donnell, and Römer (2014) used free-association tasks to investigate knowledge of Verb-Argument Constructions (VACs). They demonstrated that English speakers have independent implicit knowledge of (i) verb frequency in the VAC, (ii) VAC-verb contingency, and (iii) verb prototypicality in terms of centrality within the VAC semantic network. They concluded that VAC processing involves rich associations, tuned by verb type and token frequencies and their contingencies of usage, which interface syntax, lexis, and semantics. However, the tasks they used, where respondents had a minute to think of the verbs that fitted in VAC frames like ‘he __ across the….’, ‘it __ of the….’, etc., were quite conscious and explicit. The current experiments therefore investigate the effects of these factors in on-line processing for recognition and naming. Experiment 1 tested the recognition of VAC exemplars from very brief, masked, visual presentations. Recognition threshold was affected by overall verb frequency in the language, by the frequency with which verbs appear in the VAC, and by VAC-verb contingency (ΔPcw). Experiment 2 had participants successively name VAC arguments as quickly as possible: first the VAC and then the preposition. Preposition naming latency was a function of verb frequency in the VAC. We consider the implications for the representation and processing of VACs.
References (72)
Allan, L.G.
(
1980)
A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks.
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 151, 147–149.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Allport, D., & Funnell, E
(
1981)
Components of the mental lexicon.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 295(1077), 397–410.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, J.R.
(
1983)
A spreading activation theory of memory.
Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22(3), 261–295.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, J.R.
(
2009)
Cognitive psychology and its implications (7th edition). New York: Worth Publishers.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arnon, I., & Snider, N
(
2010)
More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases.
Journal of Memory and Language, 621, 67–82.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Audacity Team
(
2014)
Audacity (Version 2.0.2):
[URL].
Baayen, R.H., Feldman, L.B., & Schreuder, R
(
2006)
Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words.
Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 290–313.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Balota, D., Cortese, M., Sergent-Marshall, S.D., Spieler, D., & Yap, M
(
2004)
Visual word recognition of single-syllable words.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 283–316.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Balota, D., Ferraro, F., & Connor, L
(
1991)
On the early influence of meaning in word recognition: A review of the literature. In
P.J. Schwanenflugel (Ed.),
The psychology of word meanings (pp. 187–222). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barsalou, L.W.
(
2010)
Ad hoc categories. In
P.C. Hogan (Ed.),
The Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences (pp. 87–88). New York: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S
(
2015)
Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.
Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bencini, G.M.L., & Goldberg, A
(
2000)
The contribution of argument structure constructions to sentence meaning.
Journal of Memory and Language, 431, 640–651.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
BNC
(
2007)
BNC XML Edition [URL].
Bod, R
(
2001)
Sentence memory: Storage vs. computation of frequent sentences. Paper presented at the CUNY-2001, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Brown, S
(
2014)
xACT 2.22.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Catlin, J
(
1973)
In defense of sophisticated-guessing theory.
Psychological Review, 801, 412–416.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cattell, J.M.
(
1886)
The time it takes to see and name objects.
Mind, 111, 63–65.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davies, M
(
2004–)
BYU-BNC: The British National Corpus available online at
[URL].
Davies, M
(
2008–)
The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990–present. Available online at
[URL].
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V
(
2010)
Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J.P.
(
2011)
Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing.
Neuron Review, 701, 200–227.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Durrant, P., & Doherty, A
(
2010)
Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real? Investigating the thesis of collocational priming.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 61, 125–155.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ebbinghaus, H
(
1885)
Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (trans. by
H.A. Ruger &
C.E. Bussenius [1913]) New York: Teachers College, Columbia.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C.
(Ed.) (
1994)
Implicit and explicit learning of languages. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C.
(
1996)
Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(1), 91–126.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C.
(
2001)
Memory for language. In
P. Robinson (Ed.),
Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 33–68). New York: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C.
(
2002)
Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C.
(
2006a)
Language acquisition as rational contingency learning.
Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 1–24.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C.
(
2006b)
Selective attention and transfer phenomena in SLA: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning.
Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 1–31.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C.
(
2008)
Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned-attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In
P. Robinson &
N.C. Ellis (Eds.),
Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 372–405). London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C.
(
2012)
Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear.
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 321, 17–44.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C.
in press).
On-line processing of verb-argument constructions: Lexical decision and semantic processing.
Language and Cognition.
Ellis, N.C., & Ferreira-Junior, F
Ellis, N.C., Frey, E., & Jalkanen, I
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H
(
2009)
Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C., & O’Donnell, M.B.
(
2011)
Robust language acquisition: An emergent consequence of language as a complex adaptive system. In
L. Carlson,
C. Hölscher, &
T. Shipley (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
(pp. 3512–3517). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Ellis, N.C., & O’Donnell, M.B.
(
2012)
Statistical construction learning: Does a Zipfian problem space ensure robust language learning? In
J. Rebuschat &
J. Williams (Eds.),
Statistical learning and language acquisition (pp. 265–304). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C., O’Donnell, M.B., & Römer, U
(
2012)
Usage-based language: Investigating the latent structures that underpin acquisition.
Currents in Language Learning, 11, 25–51.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C., O’Donnell, M.B., & Römer, U
(
2014)
The processing of Verb-Argument Constructions is sensitive to form, function, frequency, contingency, and prototypicality.
Cognitive Linguistics, 251, 55–98.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C., & Ogden, D.C.
(
2015)
Language cognition.
Journal of Child Language, 421, 182–186.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forster, K.I., & Chambers, S
(
1973)
Lexical access and naming time.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 121, 627–635.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fox, J
(
2003)
Effect displays in R for generalised linear models.
Journal of Statistical Software, 8(15), 1–27.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Francis, G., Hunston, S., & Manning, E
(Eds.) (
1996)
Grammar patterns 1: Verbs. The COBUILD series. London: Harper Collins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A.E.
(
1995)
Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A.E., & Bencini, G.M.L
(
2005)
Support from processing for a constructional approach to grammar. In
A.E. Tyler,
M. Takada,
Y. Kim, &
D. Marinova (Eds.),
Language in use: Cognitive and discourse perspectives on language and language learning (pp. 3–18). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gries, S.T., & Ellis, N.C.
(
2015)
Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics.
Currents in Language Learning, 21, 228–255.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harnad, S
(Ed.) (
1987)
Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Howes, D.H., & Solomon, R.L.
(
1951)
Visual duration threshold as a function of word-probability.
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41(6), 401–410.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G
(
1987)
Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacWhinney, B
(
1987)
The competition model. In
B. MacWhinney (Ed.),
Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 249–308). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marcel, A.J.
(
1983)
Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition.
Cognitive Psychology, 15(2), 197–237.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McDonough, K., & De Vleeschauwer, J
(
2012)
Prompt type frequency, auditory pattern discrimination, and EFL learners’ production of wh-questions.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 355–377.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meyer, D.E., & Schvaneveldt, R.W.
(
1971)
Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 901, 227–234.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miller, G.A.
(
2009)
WordNet: About us. Retrieved March 1, 2010, from Princeton University
[URL]
Miller, G.A., & Selfridge, J.A.
(
1950)
Verbal context and the recall of meaningful material.
The American Journal of Psychology, 631, 176–185.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morton, J
(
1969)
Interaction of information in word recognition.
Psychological Review, 76(2), 165–178.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peirce, J.W.
(
2007)
PsychoPy: Psychophysics software in Python.
Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1), 8–13.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
R Development Core Team
(
2012)
R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rescorla, R.A.
(
1968)
Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning.
Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 661, 1–5.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N.C.
(Eds.) (
2008)
Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Römer, U., O’Donnell, M.B., & Ellis, N.C.
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C.B.
(
1975)
Cognitive representations of semantic categories.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1041, 192–233.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M., & Boyes-Braem, P
(
1976)
Basic objects in natural categories.
Cognitive Psychology, 81, 382–439.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Segalowitz, N
(
2010)
The cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Seidenberg, M.S., & McClelland, J.L.
(
1989a)
A distributed, developmental model of word acquisition.
Psychological Review, 941, 523–568.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Seidenberg, M.S., & McClelland, J.L.
(
1989b)
A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.
Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shanks, D.R.
(
1995)
The psychology of associative learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thorndike, E.L., & Lorge, I
(
1944)
The teacher’s book of 30,000 words. New York: Teacher’s College.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C
(
2011)
Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall casks.
Language Learning, 61(2), 569–613.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trousdale, G., & Hoffmann, T
(Eds.) (
2013)
Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zipf, G.K.
(
1935)
The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Ellis, Nick C. & Dave C. Ogden
2017.
Thinking About Multiword Constructions: Usage‐Based Approaches to Acquisition and Processing.
Topics in Cognitive Science 9:3
► pp. 604 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
ELLIS, NICK C.
2016.
Online processing of Verb–Argument Constructions: lexical decision and meaningfulness.
Language and Cognition 8:3
► pp. 391 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.