Article published in:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 14:2 (2016) ► pp. 337384
References

References

Andrews, E.
(1984) A semantic analysis of the Russian prepositions/preverbs O(-) and OB(-). The Slavic and East European Journal, 28, 477−492. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anić, V.
(2004) Veliki rječnik hrvatskoga jezika. Zagreb: Novi liber.Google Scholar
Babić, S.
(1986) Tvorba riječi u hrvatskom književnom jeziku. Zagreb: Globus.Google Scholar
Barić, E., Lončarić, M., Malić, D., Pavešić, S., Peti, M., Zečević, V., & Znika, M.
(1995) Hrvatska gramatika. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.Google Scholar
Belaj, B.
(2008) Jezik, prostor i konceptualizacija. Osijek: Grafika.Google Scholar
(2011) Schematic meaning of the Croatian verbal prefix iz-: Meaning chains and syntactic implications. In M. Brdar, S. Gries, & M. Žic Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Convergence and expansion (pp. 115–149). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beltz, J.A.
(1997) Mind, metaphor, and prefix: Evidence for prototype category structure in NHG ver-. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bogusławski, A.
(1963) Prefiksacija czasownika we współczesnym jęziku rosyskim. Wroclaw/Warsaw/Krakow: Zakład Narodowy imienia Ossolińskich wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Brugman, C.M.
(1981) Story of OVER. Trier: LAUT.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, V., Bergen K.B., & Zinken, J.
(Eds.) (2007) The cognitive linguistics reader. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Flier, M.S.
(1975) Remarks on Russian verbal prefixation. Slavic and East European Journal, 19, 218–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1984) Syntagmatic constraints on the Russian Prefix pere- . In M.S. Flier & R.D. Brecht (Eds.), Issues in Russian morphosyntax (pp. 138–154). Columbus, Ohio: Slavica.Google Scholar
Gallant, J.
(1979) Russian verbal prefixation and semantic features: An analysis of the prefix VZ-. Munich: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
(Ed.) (2006) Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A.E.
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Janda, L.
(1985) The meaning of Russian verbal prefixes: Semantics and grammar. In M.S. Flier & A. Timberlake (Eds.), The scope of Slavic aspect (pp. 26–40). Columbus, Ohio: Slavica.Google Scholar
(1986) A semantic analysis of the Russian verbal prefixes ZA-, PERE-, DO-, and OT-. Munich: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
(1988) The mapping of elements of cognitive space onto grammatical relations: An example from Russian verbal prefixation. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (pp. 327–344). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar, Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar, Volume 2: Descriptive applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 1–63). Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
(2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindner, S.J.
(1981) A lexico-semantic analysis of English verb-particle constructions with UP and OUT. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Luschützky, H.C., & Rainer, F.
(2013) Instrument and place nouns: A typological and diachronic perspective. Linguistics, 51(6), 1301–1359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rainer, F.
(2011) The agent-instrument-place “polysemy” of the suffix -TOR in Romance. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 64(1), 8–32.Google Scholar
Rudzka-Ostyn, B.
(1985) Metaphoric processes in word formation: The case of prefixed verbs. In W. Paprotte & R. Dirven (Eds.), The ubiquity of metaphor (pp. 209–241). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (1988) Topics in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silić, J., & Pranjković, I.
(2005) Gramatika hrvatskoga jezika za gimnazije i visoka učilišta. 
Zagreb: Školska knjiga.Google Scholar
Šarić, Lj
(2003) Prepositional categories and prototypes: Contrasting some Russian, Slovenian, Croatian, and Polish examples. Jezikoslovlje, 4, 187–204.Google Scholar
(2006a) A preliminary semantic analysis of the Croatian preposition u and its Slavic equivalents. Jezikoslovlje, 7, 1–43.Google Scholar
(2006b) On the meaning and prototype of the preposition pri and the locative case: A comparative study of Slavic usage with emphasis on Croatian. Rasprave Instituta za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje, 32, 225–248.Google Scholar
(2008) Spatial concepts in Slavic: A cognitive linguistic study of prepositions and cases. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
(2014) Prostor u jeziku i metafora. Zagreb: Jesenski i Turk.Google Scholar
Šarić, Lj., & Tchizmarova, I.
(2013) Space and metaphor in verbs prefixed with od-/ot- ‘from’ in Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian and Bulgarian. In Lj. Šarić (Ed.), Space in South Slavic. Oslo Studies in Language, 5(1), 7–33.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
(2001) Toward a cognitive semantics. Volume 2: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, Massachusetts/London, England: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.R.
(1995) Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) Cognitive grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Schooneveld, C.H.
(1958) The so-called ‘préverbes vides’ and neutralization. In Dutch contributions to the fourth International Congress of Slavists (pp. 159–161). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
(1978) Semantic transmutations: Prolegomena to a calculus of meaning. Volume 1: The cardinal semantic structure of prepositions, cases, and paratactic conjunctions in contemporary standard Russian. Bloomington: Physsardt.Google Scholar
Van Valin, R.D., & LaPolla, R.J.
(1997) Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.
(1953) Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
The Croatian national corpus V3.0