The Portuguese future subjunctive
A dominion analysis
Although the analysis of the Portuguese future subjunctive mood would contribute to a greater understanding of the general meaning of the subjunctive mood, this verb form has received considerably little attention compared to the other subjunctive forms, namely, the past and present subjunctives. The aim of the present paper is to fill this gap. Using the theoretical perspective of Cognitive Grammar, it will be shown that the Portuguese future subjunctive shares many characteristic features with other tenses of the subjunctive mood. In particular, the analysis shows that the Portuguese future subjunctive can be explained by the concept of dominion. Thus, the present paper provides a conceptually grounded and unified explanation for the meaning of the Portuguese subjunctive mood.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Reference grammars and previous studies
-
3.The perspective of the present study
- 3.1The concept of dominion and the subjunctive mood
- 4.Analysis
- 4.1Temporal clauses
- 4.1.1Temporal clauses and the imperfect indicative mood
- 4.1.2Temporal clauses and the imperfect subjunctive mood
- 4.2Conditional clauses
- 4.2.1Conditional clauses and the imperfect subjunctive mood
- 4.2.2Conditional clauses and the present indicative mood
- 4.3Relative clauses
- 4.3.1Relative clauses and the imperfect subjunctive mood
-
4.3.2Relative clauses and the present indicative mood
- 5.Conclusions
- Notes
-
References
This article is currently available as a sample article.
References
References
Achard, M.
(
1998)
Representation of cognitive structures: Syntax and semantics of French sentential complements. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bechara, E.
(
1999)
Moderna gramática portuguesa [
Modern Portuguese grammar]. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Lucerna.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bustos, E.
(
1986)
Pragmática del español: Negociación, cuantificación y modo [
Spanish Pragmatics: Negotiation, quantification and mood]. Madrid: UNED.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, B., & Holmback, H.
(
1984)
The future subjunctive in Portuguese: A problem in semantic theory.
Lingua, 631, 213–253.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cunha, C., & Cintra, L.
(
1984)
Nova gramática do português contemporáneo [
New grammar of contemporary Portuguese]. Lisbon: Edições João Sá da Costa.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeraerts, D.
(
2006)
Introduction. A rough guide to cognitive linguistics. In
D. Geeraerts (Ed.),
Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (pp. 1–28). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guitart, J. M.
(
1991)
The pragmatics of Spanish mood in complements of knowledge and acquisition-of-knowledge predicates. In
S. Fleischman &
L. R. Waugh (Eds.),
Discourse-pragmatics and the verb (pp. 179–193). London/New York: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, R. W.
(
1987)
Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, R. W.
(
1991)
Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, R. W.
(
1993)
Reference-point constructions.
Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 1–38.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, R. W.
(
2008)
Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, R. W.
(
2009)
Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lunn, P. V.
(
1989)
Spanish mood and the prototype of assertability.
Linguistics, 271, 687–702.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maldonado, R.
(
1995)
Middle-subjunctive links. In
P. Hamispour,
R. Maldonado, &
M. Van Naerssen (Eds.),
Studies in language learning and Spanish linguistics in honor of Tracy D. Terrell (pp.399–418). New York: McGraw Hill.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marques, R.
(
2010)
Modality, context change potential and mood selection in European Portuguese. In
M. G. Becker &
E-M. Remberger (Eds.),
Modality and mood in Romance: Modal interpretation, mood selection, and mood alternation (pp. 133–162). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mejías-Bikandi, E.
(
1994)
Assertion and speaker’s intention: A pragmatically based account of mood in Spanish.
Hispania, 77(4), 892–902.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mejías-Bikandi, E.
(
1995)
Presupposition inheritance and mood in Spanish. In
P. Hamispour,
R. Maldonado, &
M. Van Naerssen (Eds.),
Studies in language learning and Spanish linguistics in honor of Tracy D. Terrell (pp. 375–384). New York: McGraw Hill.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mejías-Bikandi, E. (
1998)
Presupposition and old information in the use of the subjunctive mood in Spanish.
Hispania, 81(4), 941–948.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mira Mateus, M. H., Brito, A. M., Duarte, I., & Hub Faria, I.
(
2003)
Gramática da língua portuguesa [
Grammar of the Portuguese Language]. Lisbon: Caminho.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Palmer, F. R.
(
2001)
Mood and modality (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perini, M. A.
(
1978)
Sintaxe e semântica do futuro do subjuntivo [Syntax and semantics of the future subjunctive]. In
Y. Goulart Liberato &
M. A. Perini (Eds.),
Ensaios de lingüística 1: Cadernos de lingüística e teoria da literatura (pp. 20–43). Belo Horizonte: Faculdade de Letras da UFMG, Centor de Extensão.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reichenbach, H.
(
1947)
Elements of symbolic logic. New York: Free Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Suñer, M., & Padilla Rivera, J.
(
1987)
Sequence of tenses and the subjunctive again.
Hispania, 70(3), 634–642.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Terrell, T.
(
1995)
Assertion and presupposition in Spanish complements. In
P. Hamispour,
R. Maldonado, &
M. Van Naerssen (Eds.),
Studies in language learning and Spanish linguistics in honor of Tracy D. Terrell (pp. 342–360). New York: McGraw Hill.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Terrell, T., & Hooper, J.
(
1974)
A semantically based analysis of mood in Spanish.
Hispania, 57(3), 484–494.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vesterinen, R.
(
2010)
Uma aproximação cognitiva ao modo conjuntivo [A cognitive approach to the subjunctive mood].
Revista Portuguesa de Humanidades: Estudos Linguísticos, 14(1), 151–174.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vesterinen, R.
(
2013)
Finalidade e domínio: A forma verbal nas orações finais introduzidas por “para” [Purpose and dominion: The verbal form in purpose clauses introduced by “para”].
Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 6(2), 351–375.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vesterinen, R.
(
2014a)
Impersonals with “ser” (‘to be’) and the dominion of effective control.
Language Sciences, 411, 143–152.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vesterinen, R.
(
2014b)
Extending the dominion of effective control: Its applicability to mood choice in Spanish and Portuguese.
Cognitive Linguistics, 25(4), 583–616.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vesterinen, R.
(
2016)
Mood alternation in Spanish conditional clauses: Condition, cause and the dominion hypothesis.
Journal of Linguistics, 52(1), 175–193.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vesterinen, R., & Bylund, M.
(
2013)
Towards a unified account of the Spanish subjunctive mood: Epistemic dominion and dominion of effective control.
Lingua, 1311, 179–198.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Kratochvílová, Dana
2023.
Epistemic modality and grounding: constructions expressing positive epistemic judgement in Spanish and Italian from the perspective of cognitive grammar (with particular reference to the verbs credere and creer).
Probus 35:2
► pp. 327 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Steriade, Donca
2023.
Priscianic Word Formation. In
The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology,
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.