This paper presents an examination of syntactic constructions that are associated with the mirative interpretation of marking propositional content as being surprising or unexpected to the speaker. I report experimental evidence showing that certain options of marked word order in German are particularly suitable in mirative contexts. Cross-linguistic evidence offers good reasons to assume that mirative marking is also reflected in word order patterns. Having identified word order variation as one option to trigger mirative interpretations of utterances, I discuss the issue of distinguishing between information-structural and mirative effects of marked syntactic configurations.
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2012). The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology, 16(3), 435–485.
Bergen, L., Goodman, N. D., & Levy, R. (2012). That’s what she (could have) said: How alternative utterances affect language use. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 120–125.
Bianchi, V., Bocci, G., & Cruschina, S. (2015). Focus fronting and its implicatures. In E. O. Aboh, J. C. Schaeffer, & P. Sleeman (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2013: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Amsterdam 2013 (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bianchi, V., & Cruschina, S. (2016). The derivation and interpretation of polar questions with a fronted focus. Lingua, 1701, 47–68.
Caudal, P., & Nicolas, D. (2005). Types of degrees and types of event structures. In C. Maienborn & A. Wöllstein (Eds.), Event arguments: Foundations and applications (pp. 277–300). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cruschina, S. (2012). Discourse-related features and functional projections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cruschina, S., Giurgea, I., & Remberger, E. M. (2015). Focus fronting between declaratives and exclamatives. Revue roumaine de linguistique, 601, 257–275.
d’Avis, F. (2013). Exklamativsatz. In J. Meibauer, M. Steinbach, & H. Altmann (Eds.), Satztypen des Deutschen (pp. 171–201). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
de Reuse, W. J. (2003). Evidentiality in Western Apache. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Studies in evidentiality (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Degen, J., Trotzke, A., Scontras, G., Wittenberg, E., & Goodman, N. D. (2016). Definitely, maybe: Approaching speaker commitment experimentally. Ms., University of Konstanz/Stanford University.
DeLancey, S. (1997). Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology, 11, 33–52.
Fanselow, G., & Lenertová, D. (2011). Left peripheral focus: Mismatches between syntax and information structure. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 291, 169–209.
Fodor, J. A. (1972). Troubles about actions. In D. Davidson & G. Harman (Eds.), Semantics of natural language (pp. 48–69). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Frey, W. (2010). Ā-Movement and conventional implicatures: About the grammatical encoding of emphasis in German. Lingua, 1201, 1416–1435.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics, 31, 199–244.
Hartmann, K., & Zimmermann, M. (2007). In place – out of place? Focus in Hausa. In K. Schwabe & S. Winkler (Eds.), On information structure, meaning and form: Generalizing across languages (pp. 365–403). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jacobs, J. (1991). Focus ambiguities. Journal of Semantics, 81, 1–36.
Krifka, M. (1995). The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items. Linguistic Analysis, 251, 209–257.
Lazard, G. (1999). Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity or other?Linguistic Typology, 31, 91–109.
Morzycki, M. (2012). Adjectival extremeness: Degree modification and contextually restricted scales. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 301, 576–609.
Müller, S. (2002). Complex predicates: Verbal complexes, resultative constructions and particle verbs in German. Stanford: CSLI.
Peterson, T. (2010). Examining the mirative and nonliteral uses of evidentials. University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics, 281, 129–159.
Peterson, T. (2013). Rethinking mirativity: The expression and implication of surprise. Ms., University of Toronto [available at: [URL]].
Peterson, T. (this volume). Problematizing mirativity.
Portner, P., & Rubinstein, A. (2016). Extreme and non-extreme deontic modals. In N. Charlow & M. Chrisman (Eds.), Deontic modality (pp. 256–282). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Potts, C. (2007). Conventional implicatures: A distinguished class of meanings. In G. Ramchand & C. Reiss (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces (pp. 475–501). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Potts, C. (2012). Conventional implicature and expressive content. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, Vol. 3 (pp. 2516–2536). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Remberger, E. M. (2014). A comparative look at focus fronting in Romance. In A. Dufter & Á. S. Octavio de Toledo (Eds.), Left sentence peripheries in Spanish: Diachronic, variationist and comparative perspectives (pp. 383–418). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rett, J. (2011). Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy, 341, 411–442.
Rett, J. (2012). Miratives across constructions and languages. Talk at CUSP 5, 28October 2012, UCSD.
Rett, J., & Murray, S. E. (2013). A semantic account of mirative evidentials. Proceedings of SALT, 231, 453–472.
Skopeteas, S., & Fanselow, G. (2011). Focus and the exclusion of alternatives: On the interaction of syntactic structure with pragmatic inference. Lingua, 1211, 1693–1706.
Spector, B. (2005). Scalar implicatures: Exhaustivity and Gricean reasoning. In M. Aloni, A. Butler, & P. Dekker (Eds.), Questions in dynamic semantics (pp. 229–254). Leiden: Brill.
Trotzke, A. (2017). The grammar of emphasis: From information structure to the expressive dimension. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Trotzke, A., & Turco, G. (2015). The grammatical reflexes of emphasis: Evidence from German wh-questions. Lingua, 1681, 37–56.
Trotzke, A., & Wittenberg, E. (2017). Expressive particle verbs and conditions on particle fronting. Journal of Linguistics, 531, 407–435.
Zanuttini, R., & Portner, P. (2003). Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language, 791, 39–81.
Zeisler, B. (this volume). Don’t believe in a paradigm that you haven’t manipulated yourself!: Evidentiality, speaker attitude, and admirativity in Ladakhi.
2021. The Semantics of Emotive Markers and Other Illocutionary Content. Journal of Semantics 38:2 ► pp. 305 ff.
Trotzke, Andreas
2020. How cool is that! A new ‘construction’ and its theoretical challenges. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 23:3 ► pp. 327 ff.
Wierzba, Marta & Gisbert Fanselow
2020. Factors influencing the acceptability of object fronting in German. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 23:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
Beltrama, Andrea & Andreas Trotzke
2019. Conveying emphasis for intensity: Lexical and syntactic strategies. Language and Linguistics Compass 13:7
Cruschina, Silvio
2019. Focus Fronting in Spanish: Mirative implicature and information structure. Probus 31:1 ► pp. 119 ff.
Cruschina, Silvio
2021. The greater the contrast, the greater the potential: On the effects of focus in syntax. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1
Destruel, Emilie, David I. Beaver & Elizabeth Coppock
2019. It's Not What You Expected! The Surprising Nature of Cleft Alternatives in French and English. Frontiers in Psychology 10
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.