Article published in:
The Linguistic Expression of Mirativity
Edited by Agnès Celle and Anastasios Tsangalidis
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:2] 2017
► pp. 460488
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y.
(2012) The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology, 16(3), 435–485. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergen, L., Goodman, N. D., & Levy, R.
(2012) That’s what she (could have) said: How alternative utterances affect language use. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 120–125.Google Scholar
Bianchi, V., Bocci, G., & Cruschina, S.
(2015) Focus fronting and its implicatures. In E. O. Aboh, J. C. Schaeffer, & P. Sleeman (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2013: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Amsterdam 2013 (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, V., & Cruschina, S.
(2016) The derivation and interpretation of polar questions with a fronted focus. Lingua, 1701, 47–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caudal, P., & Nicolas, D.
(2005) Types of degrees and types of event structures. In C. Maienborn & A. Wöllstein (Eds.), Event arguments: Foundations and applications (pp. 277–300). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruschina, S.
(2012) Discourse-related features and functional projections. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruschina, S., Giurgea, I., & Remberger, E. M.
(2015) Focus fronting between declaratives and exclamatives. Revue roumaine de linguistique, 601, 257–275.Google Scholar
d’Avis, F.
(2013) Exklamativsatz. In J. Meibauer, M. Steinbach, & H. Altmann (Eds.), Satztypen des Deutschen (pp. 171–201). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Reuse, W. J.
(2003) Evidentiality in Western Apache. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Studies in evidentiality (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Degen, J., Trotzke, A., Scontras, G., Wittenberg, E., & Goodman, N. D.
(2016) Definitely, maybe: Approaching speaker commitment experimentally. Ms., University of Konstanz/Stanford University.Google Scholar
DeLancey, S.
(1997) Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology, 11, 33–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, G., & Lenertová, D.
(2011) Left peripheral focus: Mismatches between syntax and information structure. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 291, 169–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A.
(1972) Troubles about actions. In D. Davidson & G. Harman (Eds.), Semantics of natural language (pp. 48–69). Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frey, W.
(2010) Ā-Movement and conventional implicatures: About the grammatical encoding of emphasis in German. Lingua, 1201, 1416–1435. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1967) Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics, 31, 199–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, K., & Zimmermann, M.
(2007) In place – out of place? Focus in Hausa. In K. Schwabe & S. Winkler (Eds.), On information structure, meaning and form: Generalizing across languages (pp. 365–403). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, J.
(1991) Focus ambiguities. Journal of Semantics, 81, 1–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, M.
(1995) The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items. Linguistic Analysis, 251, 209–257.Google Scholar
Lazard, G.
(1999) Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity or other? Linguistic Typology, 31, 91–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morzycki, M.
(2012) Adjectival extremeness: Degree modification and contextually restricted scales. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 301, 576–609. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, S.
(2002) Complex predicates: Verbal complexes, resultative constructions and particle verbs in German. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Peterson, T.
(2010) Examining the mirative and nonliteral uses of evidentials. University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics, 281, 129–159.Google Scholar
(2013) Rethinking mirativity: The expression and implication of surprise. Ms., University of Toronto [available at: http://​semanticsarchive​.net].
this volume). Problematizing mirativity.
Portner, P., & Rubinstein, A.
(2016) Extreme and non-extreme deontic modals. In N. Charlow & M. Chrisman (Eds.), Deontic modality (pp. 256–282). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Potts, C.
(2007) Conventional implicatures: A distinguished class of meanings. In G. Ramchand & C. Reiss (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces (pp. 475–501). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2012) Conventional implicature and expressive content. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, Vol. 3 (pp. 2516–2536). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Remberger, E. M.
(2014) A comparative look at focus fronting in Romance. In A. Dufter & Á. S. Octavio de Toledo (Eds.), Left sentence peripheries in Spanish: Diachronic, variationist and comparative perspectives (pp. 383–418). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rett, J.
(2011) Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy, 341, 411–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Miratives across constructions and languages. Talk at CUSP 5 28 October 2012, UCSD.Google Scholar
Rett, J., & Murray, S. E.
(2013) A semantic account of mirative evidentials. Proceedings of SALT, 231, 453–472. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skopeteas, S., & Fanselow, G.
(2011) Focus and the exclusion of alternatives: On the interaction of syntactic structure with pragmatic inference. Lingua, 1211, 1693–1706. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spector, B.
(2005) Scalar implicatures: Exhaustivity and Gricean reasoning. In M. Aloni, A. Butler, & P. Dekker (Eds.), Questions in dynamic semantics (pp. 229–254). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Trotzke, A.
(2017) The grammar of emphasis: From information structure to the expressive dimension. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trotzke, A., & Turco, G.
(2015) The grammatical reflexes of emphasis: Evidence from German wh-questions. Lingua, 1681, 37–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trotzke, A., & Wittenberg, E.
(2017) Expressive particle verbs and conditions on particle fronting. Journal of Linguistics, 531, 407–435. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, R., & Portner, P.
(2003) Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language, 791, 39–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zeisler, B.
this volume). Don’t believe in a paradigm that you haven’t manipulated yourself!: Evidentiality, speaker attitude, and admirativity in Ladakhi.
Zeller, J.
(2001) Particle verbs and local domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Beltrama, Andrea & Andreas Trotzke
2019. Conveying emphasis for intensity: Lexical and syntactic strategies. Language and Linguistics Compass 13:7  pp. e12343 ff. Crossref logo
Cruschina, Silvio
2019. Focus Fronting in Spanish: Mirative implicature and information structure. Probus 31:1  pp. 119 ff. Crossref logo
Cruschina, Silvio
2021. The greater the contrast, the greater the potential: On the effects of focus in syntax. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1 Crossref logo
Destruel, Emilie, David I. Beaver & Elizabeth Coppock
2019. It's Not What You Expected! The Surprising Nature of Cleft Alternatives in French and English. Frontiers in Psychology 10 Crossref logo
Rett, Jessica
2021. The Semantics of Emotive Markers and Other Illocutionary Content. Journal of Semantics 38:2  pp. 305 ff. Crossref logo
Trotzke, Andreas
2020. How cool is that! A new ‘construction’ and its theoretical challenges. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 23:3  pp. 327 ff. Crossref logo
Wierzba, Marta & Gisbert Fanselow
2020. Factors influencing the acceptability of object fronting in German. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 23:1  pp. 77 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.