Review published In:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 9:2 (2011) ► pp.419428
References
Boas, H. C.
(2003) A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2010) Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.
(2001) Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dasher, R.
(1995) The Grammaticalization in the System of Japanese Predicate Honorifics. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Stanford University.Google Scholar
Fox, B. & Thompson, S. A.
Fried, M. & Östman, J. -O.
(2004) Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In M. Fried & J. -O. Östman (eds.), Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Languages, 21] (pp. 11–86). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Construction Grammar and spoken language: The case of pragmatic particles. Journal of Pragmatics, 371, 1752–1778. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
(1997) Diachronic Prototype Semantics. A Contribution to Historical Lexicology [Oxford Studies in Lexicography and Lexicology]. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at Work. The Nature of Generalization in Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gonzálvez-García, F. & Butler, C. S.
(2006) Mapping functional-cognitive space. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 41, 39–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. & Heritage, J.
(1990) Conversation Analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 191, 283–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, S.
(2001) Causative constructions and cognitive models: The English make causative. In First Seoul International Conference on Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics: Perspectives for the 21st century (pp. 803–846). Seoul: Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics Society of Korea.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar II: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Leino, J. & Östman, J. -O.
(2005) Constructions and variability. In M. Fried & Hans Boas (eds.), Construction Grammar: Back to the Roots [Constructional approaches to language, 41] (pp. 191–213). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, L. A. & Lambrecht, K.
(2006) Toward a construction-based theory of language function: The case of nominal extraposition. Language, 721, 215–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Östman, J. -O. & Fried, M.
(eds.) (2005) Construction Grammars. Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions [Constructional approaches to language, 31]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H.
(1992ab) Lectures on Conversation, vol. 1 & 21. edited by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S. Th.
(2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 81, 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E.
(1990) From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. A.
(2002) Object complements and conversation: towards a realistic account. Studies in Language, 261, 125–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(2003) Constructing a Language. A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. & Dasher, R. B.
(2002) Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tsujimura
(1992) Keigo Ronkoo (Essays on Honorifics). Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar