Article published in:
Specialised Translation in Spain: Institutional dimensions
Edited by José Santaemilia-Ruiz and Sergio Maruenda-Bataller
[Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:2] 2017
► pp. 611635
References

References

Anthony, L.
(2016) AntConc 2.0. Software available at http://​www​.laurenceanthony​.net​/software​/antconc/
Bakhtin, M.
(1981) The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bednarek, M.
(2010) Evaluation in the news. A methodological framework for analysing evaluative language in journalism. Australian Journal of Communication, 37(2), 15–50.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K.
(1982) An investigation into formal and functional characteristics of qualifications in legislative writing and its application to English for Academic Legal Purposes. PhD thesis. University of Aston in Birmingham.Google Scholar
[ p. 633 ]
Breeze, R., Gotti, M., & Sancho Guinda, C.
(Eds) (2014) Interpersonality in legal genres. Bern: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dafouz, E.
(2008) The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 95–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eggins, S., & Slade, D.
(1997) Analysing casual conversation. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Fossum, J. E., & Schlesinger, P. R.
(2007) The European Union and the public sphere: A communicative space in the making? London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, J.
(2004) Taking legal language seriously. In J. V. Gibbons, V. Prakasam, K. V. Tirumalesh, & Hemalatha Nagarajan (Eds.), Language in the law (pp. 2–5). New Delhi: Orient Longman.Google Scholar
Goodrich, P.
(1987) Legal discourse: Studies in linguistics, rhetoric, and legal analysis. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
González, M. J.
(2011) La expresión lingüística de la actitud en el género de opinión: El modelo de la valoración [The linguistic expression of attitude in opinion discourse: The appraisal theory]. RLA: Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada, 49(1), 109–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1994/2004) An introduction to Functional Grammar. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hiltunen, R.
(1990) Chapters on legal English: Aspects past and present of the language of the law. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.Google Scholar
Hyland, K.
(2005) Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hunston, S., & Thompson, G.
(Eds.) (2000) Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, A. C.
(1995) A postmodern’s Hart: Taking rules sceptically. The Modern Law Review Ltd., 58(6), 788–819. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iedema, R., Feez, S., & White, P. R. R.
(1993) Media literacy: Disadvantaged schools program. Sydney: NSW Department of School Education.Google Scholar
Jovanović-Krstić, V.
(2005) Evaluating the discourse of war: Examining the system of Attitude in the discourse of media. In A. Makkay, W. Sullivan, & A. R. Lommel (Eds), LACUS Forum, XXXI, Interconnections (pp. 242–253). Houston, TX: LACUS. http://​www​.lacus​.org​/volumes​/31​/jovanovic​-krstic​_v​.pdf
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D.
(2003) Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R.
(2005) The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mattila, H.
(2013) Comparative legal linguistics: Language of law, Latin and modern lingua francas. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Miller, D. R.
(2002) Multiple judicial opinions as specialized sites of engagement: conflicting paradigms of valuation and legitimation in Bush v. Gore 2000. In M. Gotti, D. Heller, & M. Dossena (Eds.),Conflict and negotiation in specialized texts (pp. 119–141). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2004) ‘Truth, justice and the American way’: The appraisal system of judgement in the U. S. House debate on the impeachment of the President, 1998. In P. Bayley (Ed.), Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture: Cross- cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse (pp. 271–300). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 634 ]
Orts, M. A.
(2015) Power and complexity in legal genres: Unveiling insurance policies and arbitration rules. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue international Sémiotique juridique, 28(3), 485–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Power distance and persuasion: The tension between imposition and legitimation in international legal genres. Journal of Pragmatics, 92, 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Orts, M. A., Breeze, R., & Gotti, M.
(Eds.) (2017) Power, persuasion and manipulation in specialised genres: Providing keys to the rhetoric of professional communities. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Salmi-Tolonen, T.
(2014) Interpersonality and fundamental rights. In R. Breeze, M. Gotti, & C. Sancho Guinda (Eds.), Interpersonality in legal genres (pp. 303–328). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sancho Guinda, C., Gotti, M., & Breeze, R.
(2014) Framing interpersonality in law contexts. In R. Breeze, M. Gotti, & C. Sancho Guinda (Eds.), Interpersonality in legal genres (pp. 9–35) Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Tiersma, P. M.
(1999) Legal language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
White, P. R.
(1998) Telling media tales: The news story as rhetoric. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Sidney: University of Sidney.Google Scholar
(2003) Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text, 23(2), 259–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) The language of attitude, arguability and interpersonal positioning. [Available online]. Last retrieved May 22 2017: http://​www​.grammatics​.com​/appraisal/
(2015) Appraisal theory. In The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction [Available online]. Last retrieved May 22 2017: http://​www​.prrwhite​.info​/prrwhite,%202015,%20Appraisal%20theory,%20Wiley%20Encylopedia​.pdf doi: Crossref
[ p. 635 ]