References

Bibliografía

Applee Tree Communications
(2011) “Twitteroscopio #0.2: edición especial elecciones generales 2011”. Applee Tree Communications. Disponible en: http://​www​.appletreecommunications​.com​/es​/social​-media​-lab. Última consulta: 06/03/2015.
Bruns, A., & Burgess, J.
(2011) #ausvotes: “How Twitter covered the 2010 Australian federal election”. Communication, Politics & Culture, 44(2), 37–56.Google Scholar
Bruns, A., & Stieglitz, S.
(2012) Quantitative approaches to comparing communication patterns on Twitter. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30(3–4).Google Scholar
Bradley, M. M., Greenwald, M. K., Petry, M. C., & Lang, P. J.
(1992) Remembering pictures: Pleasure and arousal in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18(2), 379–390.Google Scholar
Christensen, C.
(2011) Twitter revolutions? Addressing social media and dissent. Communication Review, 14(3), 155–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christianson, Sven-Åke; Elizabeth, F., & Loftus, E.
(1990) Some characteristics of people’s traumatic memories. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. September 1990, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 195–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christianson, S. A.
(1992) Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 284–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conover, M. D., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Gonalves, B., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F.
(2011) Political polarization on Twitter. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. AAAI Press.Google Scholar
Deller, R.
(2011) Twittering on: Audience research and participation using Twitter. Participations, 8(1). Disponible en http://​www​.participations​.org​/Volume%208​/Issue%201​/deller​.htm
Escandell Vidal, M. Victoria
(2011)  Verum focus y prosodia: cuando la duración (sí que) importa”. Proyecto Semántica Procedimental y Contenido Explícito II (SPYCE II). Disponible en http://​portal​.uned​.es, 22/05/2015,
Hamann, S. B.
(2001) Cognitive and neural mechanisms of emotional memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(9), 394–400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, K. A., Satpute, A. B., & Gendron, M.
(2015) Does language do more than communicate emotion? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 241, 99–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
López García, A.
(1985) Introducción a la gramática liminar. Boletín de la Academia Puertorriqueña de la Lengua Española 1985, 77–97.Google Scholar
(1994) Categorías y funciones en la percepción de la oración. En F. Hernández Paricio (Ed.), Perspectivas sobre la oración (185–204). Universidad de Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Lupyan, G., & Ward, E. J.
(2013) Language can boost otherwise unseen objects into visual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 1101, 14196–14201.Google Scholar
Mancera Rueda, A. & Pano Alamán, A.
(2013) Nuevas dinámicas discursivas en la comunicación Política en Twitter, en Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación. Universidad de Sevilla y Università di Bologna, 561, 53–80.Google Scholar
Peregrino, S. F., Tomás, D., & Llopis, F.
(2013) Una aproximación basada en corpus para la detección del foco geográfico en el texto. A corpus-based approach to geographical focus detection in text. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural. Vol. 501, 69–76.Google Scholar
Schacter, D. L.
(1996) Searching for memory: The brain, the mind, and the past. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D.
(1986a) Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell. (Second edition 1995)Google Scholar
(1995) Postface to the second edition of Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Silvey, C., Kirby, S., & Smith, K.
(2015) Word meanings evolve to selectively preserve distinctions on salient dimensions. Cognitive Science, 391, 212–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T., Sandner, P., & Welpe, L.
(2010) Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google Scholar
(2011) Election forecasts with Twitter: How 140 characters reflect the political landscape. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 402–418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Twitter, Inc. Company (s.f.)
Van Dijk, Teun A.
(2009) Relevance assignment in discourse comprehension. Discourse processes, Vol. 2, Issue 2 1979 Edición digital, consultada el 27/05/2015 http://​www​.tandfonline​.com​/doi​/abs​/10​.1080​/01638537909544458
Yardi, S., & Boyd, D.
(2010) Dynamic debates: An analysis of group polarization over time on twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 201, 1–8.Google Scholar
Zhang, M. y Ye, X.
(2008) A generation model to unify topic relevance and lexicon-based sentiment for opinion retrieval. ACM SIGIR 2008, 411–418Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M.ª L.
(1999) Las funciones informativas: tema y foco. En I. Bosque, I. y V. Demonte, V. (Dirs.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (capítulo 64). Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar