References

Referencias

Agencia de Calidad de la Educación
(2016) PIRLS: Estudio Internacional del Progreso en Competencia Lectora. https://​www​.agenciaeducacion​.cl​/estudios​/estudios​-internacionales​/pirls/
(2017) Informe técnico Simce 2017. Recuperado de https://​www​.agenciaeducacion​.cl
(2018) Informe de resultados: Estudio Nacional de Inglés 2017. Recuperado de https://​www​.agenciaeducacion​.cl
Aravena, J.
(2014) Conciencia fonológica en dos grupos de escolares que cursan primer año básico en colegios municipales y particulares. Revista Chilena de Fonoaudiología, 40–49.Google Scholar
Balbi, A., Von Hagen, A., Ruiz, C., & Cuadro, A.
(2019) Precursores de la Competencia Lectora Inicial en Escolares Hispanoparlantes de Nivel Socioeconómico Vulnerable. Psykhe, 29 (1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Best, R. M., Rowe, M., Ozuru, Y., & McNamara, D. S.
(2005) Deep-level comprehension of science texts: The role of the reader and the text. Topics in Language Disorders, 25 (1), 65–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Black, J., & Bower, G.
(1980) Story understanding as problem-solving. Poetics, 9 (1), 223–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L., Lahey, M., Hood, L., Lifter, K., & Fiess, K.
(1980) Complex sentences: Acquisition of syntactic connectives and the semantic relations they encode. Journal of child language, 7 (2), 235–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowey, J.
(1995) Socioeconomic status differences in preschool phonological sensitivity and first-grade reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87 (3), 476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F.
(2002) Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53 1, 371–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buckingham, J., Wheldall, K., & Beaman-Wheldall, R.
(2013) Why poor children are more likely to become poor readers: The school years. Australian Journal of Education, 57 (3), 190–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cain, K., & Nash, H.
(2011) The influence of connectives on young readers’ processing and comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103 1, 429–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., Barnes, M. A., & Bryant, P. E.
(2001) Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 29 (6), 850–859. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cain, K., Patson, N., & Andrews, L.
(2005) Age- and ability-related differences in young readers’ use of conjunctions. Journal of Child Language, 32 1, 877–892. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canestrelli, A., Mak, W., & Sanders, T.
(2013) Causal connectives in discourse processing: How differences in subjectivity are reflected in eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28 (9), 1394–1413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castillo, P., González, A., & Puga, I.
(2011) Gestión y efectividad en educación: evidencias comparativas entre establecimientos municipales y particulares subvencionados. Estudios Pedagógicos, 37 (1), 187–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Centro de Microdatos de la Universidad de Chile
Chall, J. S., & Jacobs, V. A.
(2003) The classic study on poor children’s fourth-grade slump. American Educator, 27 (1), 14–15.Google Scholar
Cheng, Y., & Wu, X.
(2017) The relationship between SES and reading comprehension in Chinese: A mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 8 1, 672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J.
(1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Coschiza, C. C., Martín Fernández, J., Gapel Redcozub, G., Nievas, M. E., & Ruiz, H. E.
(2016) Características socioeconómicas y rendimiento académico. El caso de una universidad argentina. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia Y Cambio En Educación, 14 (3), 51–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cozijn, R.
(2000) Integration and inferences in understanding causal sentences [Tesis doctoral, Tilburg University]. Repositorio de Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Cozijn, R., Noordman, L., & Vonk, W.
(2011) Propositional integration and world-knowledge inference: Processes in understanding because sentences. Discourse Processes, 48 (7), 475–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crosson, A. C., Lesaux, N. K., & Martiniello, M.
(2008) Factors that influence comprehension of connectives among language minority children from Spanish-speaking backgrounds. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29 1, 603–625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, L., & Sanders, T.
(2002) The impact of relational markers on expository text comprehension in L1 and L2. Reading and Writing, 15 1, 739–757. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, L., & Pander Maat, H.
(2003) A contrastive study of Dutch and French causal connectives on the speaker involvement scale. In A. Verhagen & J. van de Weijer (Eds.), Usage-based approaches to Dutch (pp. 175–199). LOT.Google Scholar
De Vega, M.
(2005) El procesamiento de oraciones con conectores adversativos y causales. Cognitiva, 17 (1), 85–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evers-Vermeul, J., & Sanders, T.
(2009) The emergence of Dutch connectives; how cumulative cognitive complexity explains the order of acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 36 (4), 829–854. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreres, A., Abusamra, V., & Squillace, M.
(2010) Comprensión de textos y oportunidades educativas. In Actas del Congreso Iberoamericano de Educación (pp. 1–11). Universidad de Cádiz y Asociación Formación.Google Scholar
Fonseca, L., Pujals, M., Lasala, E., Migliardo, G., Aldrey, A., Buonsanti, L., & Barreyro, J. P.
(2014) Desarrollo de habilidades de comprensión lectora en niños de escuelas de distintos sectores socioeconómicos. Neuropsicología Latinoamericana, 6 (1).Google Scholar
Geva, E., & Ryan, E. B.
(1985) Use of conjunctions in expository texts by skilled and less skilled readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17 1, 331–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldman, S. R.
(1997) Learning from text: Reflections on the past and suggestions for the future. Discourse Processes, 23 (3), 357–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldman, S., & Varnhagen, C.
(1986) Memory for embedded and sequential story structures. Journal of Memory and Language, 25 (4), 401–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González, A., & Dupriez, V.
(2016) Acceso a las universidades selectivas en Chile: ¿pueden las estrategias institucionales de los establecimientos secundarios atenuar el peso del capital cultural?. Revista Complutense de Educación, 28 (3), 947–964. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A., & Clark, L.
(1985) Structures and procedures of implicit knowledge. Ablex.Google Scholar
Graesser, A., McNamara, D., & Louwerse, M.
(2003) What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text? In A. Sweet & C. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 82–98). Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Guardia, P.
(2002) Relaciones entre kabilidades de alfabetización emergente y la lectura desde nivel de transición mayor a primero básico [Tesis de magíster, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile]. Repositorio de la Universidad Católica de Chile.Google Scholar
Haberlandt, K.
(1982) Reader expectations in text comprehension. In J. Le Ny & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Language and language comprehension (pp. 239–249). North-Holland. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Havik, E., Roberts, L., Van Hout, R., Schreuder, R., & Haverkort, M.
(2009) Processing subject-object ambiguities in the L2: A self-paced reading study with German L2 learners of Dutch. Language Learning, 591, 73–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henning, C., McIntosh, B., Arnott, W., & Dodd, B.
(2010) Long-term outcome of oral language and phonological awareness intervention with socially disadvantaged preschoolers: The impact on language and literacy. Journal of Research in Reading, 33 1, 231–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibáñez, R.
(2008) Comprensión de textos académicos escritos en inglés: Relación entre nivel de logro y variables involucradas. Signos, 41 (67), 203–229.Google Scholar
Ibáñez, R., Moncada, F., & Arriaza, V.
(2018) Recontextualización del conocimiento en textos escolares chilenos. Revista Signos, 51 (98), 430–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibáñez, R., Moncada, F., & Cárcamo, B.
(2019) Coherence relations in primary school textbooks: Variation across school subjects. Discourse Processes, 56 (8), 764–785. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jegerski, J., & VanPatten, B.
(Eds.) (2013) Research methods in second language psycholinguistics. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, N.
(2012) Conducting reaction time research in second language studies. Routledge.Google Scholar
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D.
(1982) Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 111 (2), 228–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamalski, J., Sanders, T., & Lentz, L.
(2008) Coherence marking, prior knowledge, and comprehension of informative and persuasive texts: Sorting things out. Discourse Processes, 45 (4–5), 323–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kieffer, M.
(2010) Socioeconomic status, English proficiency, and late-emerging reading difficulties. Educational Research, 39 ( 6 ), 484–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W.
(1998) Comprehension. A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knott, A.
(2001) Semantic and pragmatic relations and their intended effects. In T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord, & W. Spooren (Eds.), Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects (pp. 127–152). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knott, A., & Dale, R.
(1994) Using linguistic phenomena to motivate a set of coherence relations. Discourse processes, 18 (1), 35–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knott, A., & Sanders, T.
(1998) The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: An exploration of two languages. Journal of Pragmatics 301, 135–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lau, K., & Chan, D.
(2003) Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good and poor readers in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Reading, 261, 177–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, F., Mak, W., Evers-Vermeul, J., & Sanders, T.
(2017) On the online effects of subjectivity encoded in causal connectives. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association, 15 (1), 34–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loman, N., & Mayer, R.
(1983) Signaling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75 (3), 402–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorch, R., & Lorch, E.
(1986) On-line processing of summary and importance signals in reading. Discourse Processes, 91, 489–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louwerse, M. M.
(2004) Un modelo conciso de cohesión en el texto y coherencia en la comprensión. Revista signos, 37 (56), 41–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDowell, K., Lonigan, C., & Goldstein, H.
(2007) Relations among socioeconomic status, age, and predictors of phonological awareness. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 501, 1079–1092. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D.
(2001) Reading both high and low coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 551, 51–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D. & Kintsch, W.
(1996) Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22 1, 247–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D., Kintsch, E., Songer, N., & Kintsch, W.
(1996) Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14 (1), 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meneses, A., Montenegro, M., & Ruiz, M.
(2013) Textos escolares para aprender Ciencias: habilidades, contenidos y lenguaje académico. In Evidencias para políticas públicas en educación: Selección de investigaciones Sexto Concurso FONIDE (pp. 233–278). Centro de Estudios MINEDUC.Google Scholar
Meyer, B., Brandt, D., & Bluth, G.
(1980) Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16 1, 72–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, B. & Freedle, R.
(1984) Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21(1), 121–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, T. & Webber, B.
(2013) Implicitation of discourse connectives in (machine) translation. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Discourse in Machine Translation (pp. 19–26). Bulgaria.Google Scholar
Millis, K. & Just, M.
(1994) The influence of connectives on sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 33 1, 128–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moncada, F.
(2018) Interacción entre conectores y conocimiento previo en el procesamiento de la coherencia causal. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada de la Comunicación, 76 1, 179–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morera, Y., & de Vega, M.
(2006) Los conectores ¿conectan o no conectan? La dinámica de fuerzas en la construcción de frases con conectores causales y adversativos: un estudio normativo. In E. Gámez & J. Díaz (Eds.), Investigaciones en Psicología Básica ULL: Psicolingüística, Razonamiento y Emoción (pp. 53–64). Universidad de La Laguna y Asociación Cultural Cabrera y Galdós.Google Scholar
Mulder, G.
(2008) Understanding causal coherence relations [Tesis Doctoral, Utrecht University]. Repositorio de la Universidad de Utrecht.Google Scholar
Murray, J. D.
(1995) Logical connectives and local coherence. In R. F. Lorch & E. J. O’brieen (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 107–125). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Noordman, L., & De Blijzer, F.
(2000) On the processing of causal relations. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & B. Kortmann (Eds.), Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives (pp. 35–56). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noordman, L., & Vonk, W.
(1997) The different functions of a conjunction in constructing a representation of the discourse. In J. Costermans & M. Fayol (Eds.), Processing interclausal relationships. Studies in the production and comprehension of text (pp. 75–93). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Olivera Vidal, M. P.
(2016) Estudio de uso y valoración de textos escolares: Informe final. MINEDUC y Oficina Regional de Educación para América Latina y el Caribe (UNESCO).Google Scholar
O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D.
(2007) Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: Good texts can be better for strategic, high-knowledge readers. Discourse processes, 43 (2), 121–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
(2010) PISA 2009 results: Overcoming social background. Equity in learning opportunities and outcomes (Vol. 21). OECD.Google Scholar
Oversteegen, L.
(2005) Causality and tense – Two temporal structure builders. Journal of Semantics, 22 1, 307–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parodi, G.
(2005) Comprensión de textos escritos. Eudeba.Google Scholar
Peronard, M.
(2007) Lectura en papel y en pantalla de computador. Revista signos, 40 (63), 179–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Renkema, J.
(2004) Introduction to discourse studies. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, T.
(2005) Coherence, causality and cognitive complexity in discourse. In M. Aurnague, M. Bras, A. Draoulec, & L. Vieu (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Symposium on the Exploration and Modelling of Meaning SEM-05 (pp. 31–44). University of Toulouse-le-Mirail.Google Scholar
Sanders, T., & Canestrelli, A. R.
(2012) The processing of pragmatic information in discourse. In H. Schmid (Ed.), Cognitive pragmatics (pp. 201–232). Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, T., & Noordman, L.
(2000) The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing. Discourse Processes, 29 1, 37–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, T., Land, J., & Mulder, G.
(2007) Linguistics markers of coherence improve text comprehension in functional contexts. Information Design Journal, 15 (3), 219–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, T. J., Spooren, W. P., & Noordman, L. G.
(1992) Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse processes, 15 (1), 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, T., Spooren, W., & Noordman, L.
(1993) Coherence relations in a cognitive theory of discourse representation. Cognitive Linguistics, 4 (2), 93–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scarborough, H. S., & Dobrich, W.
(1994) On the efficacy of reading to preschoolers. Developmental Review, 14 (3), 245–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sirin, S. R.
(2005) Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P.
(Eds.) (1998) Preventing reading difficulties in young children. National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Soaje de Elías, R.
(2018) Textos escolares: consideraciones didácticas. Educación y Educadores, 21 (1), 73–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D.
(2010) Epistemic vigilance. Mind and Language, 25 (4), 359–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spooren, W., & Sanders, T.
(2008) The acquisition of coherence relations: on cognitive complexity in discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40 (12), 2003–2026. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spyridakis, J. H.
(1989) Signaling effects: A review of the research – Part I. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 19(3), 227–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spyridakis, J. H., & Standal, T. C.
(1987) Signals in expository prose: Effects on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 22 (3), 285–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stukker, N., & Sanders, T.
(2012) Subjectivity and prototype structure in causal connectives: A cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 44 (2), 169–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stukker, N., Sanders, T., & Verhagen, A.
(2008) Causality in verbs and in discourse connectives: Converging evidence of cross-level parallels in Dutch linguistic categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 40 (7), 1296–1322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E.
(1990) From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taboada, M.
(2009) Implicit and explicit coherence relations. In J. Renkema (Ed.), Discourse, of Course (pp. 127–140). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trabasso, T., & Sperry, L.
(1985) Causal relatedness and importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24 1, 595–611. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traxler, M., Bybee, M., & Pickering, M.
(1997) Influence of connectives on language comprehension: Eye-tracking evidence for incremental interpretation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50 (3), 481–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traxler, M., Sanford, A., Aked, J., & Moxey, L.
(1997) Processing causal and diagnostic statements in discourse. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23 (1), 88–101.Google Scholar
Van den Broek, P.
(1990) The causal inference maker: Towards a process model of inference generation in text comprehension. In D. Balota, G. Flores & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 423–445). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2010) Using texts in science education: Cognitive processes and knowledge representation. Science, 328 (5977), 453–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van der Vliet, N., & Redeker, G.
(2014) Explicit and implicit coherence relations in Dutch texts. In H. Gruber & G. Redeker (Eds.), The pragmatics of discourse coherence (pp. 23–52). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Silfhout, G., Evers-Vermeul, J., & Sanders, T.
(2015) Connectives as processing signals: How students benefit in processing narrative and expository texts. Discourse Processes, 52 (1), 47–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Silfhout, G., Evers-Vermeul, J., Mak, W. & Sanders, T.
(2014) Connectives and layout as processing signals: How textual features affect students’ processing and text representation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106 (4), 1036. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Villalón, M.
(2008) Alfabetización Inicial: Claves de acceso al aprendizaje de la lengua escrita. Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.Google Scholar
Voss, J., & Silfies, L.
(1996) Learning from history text: The interaction of knowledge and comprehension skill with text structure. Cognition and Instruction, 14 1, 45–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wei, Y., Mak, W. M., Evers-Vermeul, J., & Sanders, T. J.
(2019) Causal connectives as indicators of source information: Evidence from the visual world paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 198 1, 102866. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, M. B., Magliano, J. P., & Larsen, B.
(2005) Causal and semantic relatedness in discourse understanding and representation. Discourse Processes, 39 (2–3), 165–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zufferey, S.
(2010) Lexical pragmatics and theory of mind: the acquisition of connectives (Vol. 2011). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zunino, G.
(2016) Construcción de causalidad y contracausalidad en sujetos con distinto nivel educativo. Acta de investigación psicológica, 6 (2), 2412–2421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zunino, G., Abusamra, V., & Raiter, A.
(2016) Causality, iconicity and continuity: the effects of prior world knowledge on the understanding of causal relations. Alfa: Revista de Linguística, 60 (2), 261–285.Google Scholar
Zunino, G., & Raiter, A.
(2012) Construcción de coherencia textual. Un estudio preliminar acerca de la causalidad y sus implicancias neuropsicolingüísticas. Revista Neuropsicología Latinoamericana, 4 (2), 1–15.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A.
(1998) Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological bulletin, 123 (2), 162–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar