Cover not available
Article published In:
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 37:2 (2024) ► pp.424–453

The interpretation of reflexive pronouns in VP-ellipsis by L2 English learners with different proficiency levels

ORCID logo | Universidad de Cantabria,
ORCID logo | Universidad de Cantabria,
English reflexive anaphora in cases of VP-ellipsis may allow for strict and sloppy readings. A few L2 studies (Epoge, 2012; Park, 2016; Ying, 2005) have focused on determining the role that L2 proficiency may exert on learners’ choices in bare, referential, and non-referential contexts. This paper provides data from 104 Spanish learners of English (A2, B1, and B2 levels) and 32 native speakers of English. Results showed that participants tended to interpret reflexives sloppily in bare and non-referential contexts, whereas strict readings prevailed in referential ones. There existed significant differences in the interpretation of learners versus native speakers, whilst the differences among the three learner groups were not so marked. However, the least proficient group differed most from native speakers. Findings partially confirm previous research and discrepancies may be tentatively ascribed to extraneous variables (e.g., the learners’ L1, the range of the proficiency levels, or the characteristics of the control groups).
Keywords: VP-ellipsis, reflexive pronouns, strict reading, sloppy reading, proficiency level, L2 English
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.State of the art
    • 2.1Reflexive anaphora in cases of VPE
    • 2.2L1 English studies on reflexive anaphora in VPE
    • 2.3L2 English studies on reflexive anaphora in VPE
  • 3.Research questions
  • 4.Method
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Instruments
    • 4.3Data gathering procedure
  • 5.Data analysis procedure
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Intergroup comparisons
    • 6.2Intragroup comparisons
  • 7.Discussion
    • 7.1Proficiency effect
    • 7.2Context effect
  • 8.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 11 March 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.21054.gal
References (45)
References
Aelbrecht, L. (2009). You Have the Right to Remain Silent. The Syntactic Licensing of Ellipsis [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Catholic University of Brussels. [URL]
(2010). The syntactic licensing of ellipsis. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Al-Kafri, A. (2013). Interpretation of English Reflexives by Child and Adult L2 Learners [Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University]. CORE. [URL]
Al-Thubaiti, K. A. (2018). Selective vulnerability in very advanced L2 grammars: evidence from VPE constraints. Second Language Research, 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, S. (1994). Interpretation of English reflexives by adolescent speakers of Serbo-Croatian. Second Language Research, 10 (2), 125–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, D. (1984). On the content of empty categories. Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Contemori, C., Asiri, O., & Perea Irigoyen, E. D. (2019). Anaphora resolution in L2 English: An analysis of discourse complexity and cross-linguistic interference. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (1998). The truth value judgment task: Fundamentals of design. University of Maryland working papers in linguistics, 6 1, 61–70.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, M. (2005). Against reconstruction in ellipsis. In R. Elugardo & R. J. Stainton (Eds.), Ellipsis and nonsentential speech. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 811 (pp. 31–55). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dalrymple, M., Shieber, S. M., & Pereira, F. C. (1991). Ellipsis and higher-order unification. Linguistics and philosophy, 14 (4), 399–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dong, Y., Wen, Y., Zeng, X., & Ji, Y. (2015). Exploring the cause of English pronoun gender errors by Chinese learners of English: Evidence from the self-paced reading paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44 (6), 733–747. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duffield, N. G., & Matsuo, A. (2009). Native speakers’ versus L2 learners’ sensitivity to parallelism. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31 1, 93–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epoge, N. K. (2012). Reflexive anaphora in VP-elliptical sentences of ESL learners in Cameroon. Syllabus Review, 3 (1), 257–279.Google Scholar
Fiengo, R., & May, R. (1994). Indices and identity. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (2006). Ellipsis and discourse coherence. Linguistics and Philosophy, 29 (3), 315–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gandón-Chapela, E., & Gallardo-del-Puerto, F. (2019). Verb phrase ellipsis and reflexive anaphora resolution in second language acquisition: A study of Spanish learners of English. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 59 1, 71–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hankamer, J., & Sag, I. A. (1976). Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 7 1, 391–428.Google Scholar
Hestvik, A. (1995). Reflexives and ellipsis. Natural Language Semantics, 3 1, 211–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirakawa, M. (1990). A study of the L2 acquisition of English reflexives. Second Language Research, 6 (1), 60–85.Google Scholar
Hwang, H. (2020). A contrast between VP-Ellipsis and Gapping in English: L1 acquisition, L2 acquisition, and L2 processing. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa]. Scholar Space. [URL]
Johnson, K. (2001). What VP ellipsis can do, and what it can’t, but not why. In M. Baltin & C. Collins (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory (pp. 439–79). Blackwell Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kehler, A. (2000). Coherence and the resolution of ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy, 23 1, 533–575. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. (2015). Korean L2 Learners’ comprehension of VP-ellipsis and one-substitution in English. Enekwahakyenkwu [The Journal of Linguistics Science], 75 1, 107–128.Google Scholar
Kim, C. S., & Runner, J. (2009). Strict identity, coherence, and parallelism in VP ellipsis. In E. Cormany, S. Ito, & D. Lutz (Eds.), Semantics and Linguistic Theory. Proceedings of the 19th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (pp. 275–287). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitagawa, Y. (1991). Copying identity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 9 1, 497–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, D., & Schachter, J. (1997). Sensitive period effects in Binding Theory. Language Acquisition, 6 (4), 333–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lozano, C. (2021). Anaphora Resolution in Second Language Acquisition. In M. Aronoff (Ed.), Oxford Bibliographies in Linguistics. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacLaughlin, D. (1998). The acquisition of the morphosyntax of English reflexives by non-native speakers. In M. L. Beck (Ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge (pp.195–226). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsuo, A., & Duffield, N. (2001). VP-ellipsis and anaphora in child language acquisition. Language Acquisition, 9 1, 301–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKillen, A. (2016). On the interpretation of reflexive pronouns. [Doctoral dissertation, McGill University]. Library and Archives Canada. [URL]
Ong, M., & Brasoveanu, A. (2014). Strict and sloppy reflexives in VP-ellipsis. In C. Piñón (Ed.), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 10 1 (pp. 251–268). [URL]
Park, E. (2016). Korean English learners’ interpretation of reflexive anaphora in VP-ellipsis. Journal of Language Sciences, 23 (3), 111–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Postman, W. A., Foley, C., Pactovis, J., Rothenstein, B., Kaye, M., Lowe, D., & Lust, B. (1997). Children’s knowledge of verbal inflection and LF raising: New evidence from elicited production of VP ellipsis structures. In S. Somashekar, K. Yamakoshi, M. Blume, & C. Foley (Eds.), Cornell working papers in linguistics: Papers on language acquisition 15 1 (pp. 39–64). Cornell Linguistics Circle.Google Scholar
Roeper, T. (2018). Ellipsis and acquisition. In J. van Craenenbroeck & T. Temmerman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of ellipsis (pp. 276–313). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. [Doctoral dissertation, MIT]. MIT Libraries. [URL]
Sag, I. A. (1976). Deletion and Logical Form [Doctoral dissertation, MIT]. MIT Libraries. [URL]
Scuitti, S. (2020). The acquisition of clitic pronouns in complex infinitival clauses by German-speaking learners of Italian as an L3: The role of proficiency in target and background language(s). In C. Bardel & L. Sánchez (Eds.), Third language acquisition: Age, proficiency and multilingualism (pp. 111–144). Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora Resolution in Near-native Speakers of Italian. Second Language Research 22(3), 339–368.Google Scholar
Thornton, R., & Wexler, K. (1999). Principle B, VP ellipsis, and interpretation in child grammar. MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, E. (1977). Discourse and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry, 8 (1), 101–39.Google Scholar
Xiao, F. (2015). Proficiency effect on L2 pragmatic competence. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 5 (4), 557–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ying, H. G. (2005). Second language learners’ reading of reflexive anaphora in VP-ellipsis: A Relevance Theory perspective. Language Sciences, 27 1, 551–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yip, V., & Tang, G. (1998). Acquisition of English reflexive binding by Cantonese learners: Testing the Positive Transfer Hypothesis. In M. L. Beck (Ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge (pp.165–193). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, M. (2008). Think-Aloud Protocols and Type of Reading Task: The Issue of Reactivity in L2 Reading Research. In M. Bowles, R. Foote, S. Perpiñán, & R. Bhatt (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 2007 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 199–209). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar