Alonso Belmonte, I. (1997). Estrategias textuales y su realización temática en español: Un estudio de corpus [Textual strategies and their thematic realization in Spanish: A corpus study]. RESLA, 121, 55-74.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arús, J. (2007). On the ‘aboutness’ of Theme. In M. Losada, P, Ron, S. Hernández, & J. Casanova (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 30th International AEDEAN Conference
(CD ROM Publication).
Arús, J. (2010). On Theme in English and Spanish: A comparative study. In E. Swaine (Ed.), Thresholds and potentialities of Systemic Functional Linguistics: Multilingual, multimodal and other specialised discourses (pp. 23-48). Trieste: EUT Edizioni Università Di Trieste.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bäcklund, I. (1991). Theme in English telephone conversation. Language Sciences, 14(4), 545-564. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berry, M. (1996). What is theme? A(nother) personal view. In M. Berry, C.S. Butler, R.P. Fawcett, & G. Huang (Eds.), Meaning and form: Systemic functional interpretations. Meaning and choice in language: Studies for Michael Halliday (pp. 1-64). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berry, M. (2013). Contentful and contentlight subject themes in informal spoken English and formal written English. In G. O’Grady, T. Bartlett, & L. Fontaine (Eds.), Choice in language: Applications in text analysis (pp. 243-268). London: Equinox.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berry, M., Thompson, G., & Hillier, H. (forthcoming). Theme and variations. In M.A. Gómez, F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza, & F. Gonzálvez (Eds.), Theory and practice in functional-cognitive space. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Biber, D. (1995). Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (1995). The functional analysis of English: A Hallidayan approach. London: Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Casanova, V., & Franco, A. (2006). Tema, rema y focalización: Del enunciado al texto. Análisis de títulos y leads de prensa [Theme, rheme and focalization: From statement to text. Analysis of press headlines and leads]. Quórum Académico, 3(2), 55-81.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, W.L. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago: Chicago University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chao, K.H. (2002). Thematic progression in the argumentative essays of EFL senior high school students. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. National Chengchi University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, H.H., & Haviland, S.E. (1977). Comprehension and the given-new contract. In R.O. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension (pp. 1-40). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cornish, F. (1999). Anaphora, discourse and understanding: Evidence from English and French. Oxford: Clarendon.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daneš, F. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In F. Daneš (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective (pp. 100-128). Prague: Academia.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Downing, A. (1991). An alternative approach to Theme: A systemic-functional perspective. Word, 42(2), 119-143. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dubois, B.L. (1987). A reformulation of thematic progression typology. Text, 7(2), 89-116. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). New York: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Enkvist, N.E. (1973). Theme dynamics and style: An experiment. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 51, 127–35.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Erteschik-Shir, N. (1997). The dynamics of focus structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Firbas, J. (1992). Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fodor, J.D., & Sag, I. (1982). Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy, 51, 355-398. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Francis, G. (1989). Thematic selection and distribution in written discourse. Word, 40(2), 201-222. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fries, P.H. (1981). On the status of theme: Arguments from discourse. Forum Linguisticum, 6(1), 1-38.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fries, P.H. (1995). Themes, methods of development, and texts. In R. Hasan & P.H. Fries (Eds.), On subject and theme: From the perspective of functions in discourse (pp. 317-359). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fries, P.H. (2009). The textual metafunction as a site for a discussion of the goals of linguistics and techniques of linguistic analysis. In G. Forey & G. Thompson (Eds.), Text type and texture (pp. 8-44). London: Equinox.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fries, P.H., & Francis, G. (1992). Exploring theme: Problems for research. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics, 61, 45-59.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ghadessy, M. (1995). Thematic development and its relationship to registers and genres. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Thematic development in English texts (pp. 129-145). London: Pinter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goatly, A. (2008). Explorations in stylistics. London: Equinox.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gómez González,M. A. (1994). The relevance of Theme in the textual organization of BBC news reports. Word, 45(3), 293-305. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gómez González,M. A. (1997). A contrastive critique of Topic and Theme in Functional Grammar (SFG). RESLA, 121, 75-94.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gómez González,M. A. (1998a). Towards an alternative account of FG Topic. Verba, 251, 345-356.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gómez González,M. A.(1998b). About topicality and thematicity in Functional Grammar (FG) and Systemic Functional Grammar. Seminarios de Lingüística, 21, 49-67.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gómez González,M. A. (1998c). The ins and outs of the notion of ‘aboutness’. Interface, 13(1), 19-32.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gómez González,M. A. (2002). First mention orientation in discourse. In L. Iglesias & S. Doval (Eds.), Studies in contrastive linguistics (pp. 37-48). Santiago de Compostela: Servicio de Publicaciones de la USC.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gómez González,M. A. (2004). Functional Grammar and the dynamics of discourse. In J.L. Mackenzie & M.A. Gómez González (Eds.), A new architecture for Functional Grammar (pp. 211‑243). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grosz, B.J., & Sidner, C.L. (1986). Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3), 175-204.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gundel, J.K. (1978). Stress, pronominalization and the given-new distinction. Working Papers in Linguistics, 10(2), 1-13.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gundel, J.K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 691, 274-307. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994)[1985]. An introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed). London: Edward Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2004). An introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hannay, M., & Gómez González, M.A. (2012). Thematic parentheticals in Dutch and English. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 6(1-3), 99-127. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Irmer, M. (2011). Bridging inferences. Constraining and resolving under-specification in discourse interpretation. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jalilifar, A.R. (2010). The status of theme in applied linguistics articles. Asian ESP Journal, 6(2), 7-39.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, R.W. (2009). Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lavid, J., Arús, J., & Moratón, L. (2010). Signalling genre through Theme: The case of news reports and commentaries.
Proceedings of the 8th MAD: Signalling Text Organisation
, 82-92.
Longacre, R.E. (1981). A spectrum and profile approach to discourse analysis. Text, 11, 337-59. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Longacre, R.E. (1989). Two hypothesis regarding text generation and analysis. Discourse Processes, 121, 413-60. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mann, W.C., & Thompson, S.A. (1988). Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8(3), 243-281. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, J.R. (1997). Analysing genre: Functional parameters. In F. Christie & J.R. Martin (Eds.), Genres and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 3-39). London: Cassell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martinez Lirola, M. (2009). Main processes of thematization and postponement in English. Bern: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mathesius, V. (1939). O takzvaném aktuálním členění věty. Slovo a slovesnost, 51, 171-174 [Translated into English in Harvard Studies in Syntax and Semantics, 1, 1975, 467-480].![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCabe, A. (1999). Theme and thematic patterns in Spanish and English history texts. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Aston University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCabe, A., & Alonso Belmonte, I. (2000). Theme, rheme and cognitive representation in Spanish and English texts. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 401, 77-94.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moya, A.J. (2003). Thematic and topical structuring in three subgenres. A contrastive Study. Miscelánea, 271, 131-154.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moya, A.J., & Ávila, J.A. (2009). Thematic progression of children’s stories as related to different stages of cognitive development. Text & Talk, 29(6), 755-774. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Munday, J. (1997). Systems in translation: A computer-assisted systemic analysis of the translation of García Márquez. Ph.D. thesis. University of Bradford.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nwogu, K.N. (1990). Discourse variation in medical texts: Schema, theme and cohesion in professional and journalistic accounts. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nwogu, K., & Bloor, T. (1991). Thematic progression in professional and popular medical texts. In E. Ventola (Ed.) Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses (pp. 369-384). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ping, A.L. (2005). Talking themes: The thematic structure of talk. Discourse Studies, 71, 701-732. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plum, G.A. (1988). Textual and contextual conditioning in spoken English: A genre-based approach. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Sydney.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ravelli, L.J. (2004). Signalling the organization of written texts: hyper-Themes in management and history essays. In L.J. Ravelli & R.A. Ellis (Eds.), Analysing academic writing (pp. 104-130). London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, T. (1981). Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica, 27(1), 1-38.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swales, J.M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taboada, M. (1995). Theme markedness in English and Spanish: A systemic-functional approach. MS, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, G., & Thompson, S. (2009). Theme, subject and the unfolding of text. In G. Forey & G. Thompson (Eds.), Text type and texture: In honour of Flo Davies (pp. 45-69). London: Equinox.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomlin, R.S., Forrest, L., Pu. M., & Kim, M.H. (1997). Knowledge integration and information management in discourse. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse: A multidisciplinary introduction (pp. 63-111). London: Sage. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trujillo, F., & Fortes, M.R. (2002). Estructura temática de las noticias de prensa sobre violencia doméstica: Un ejercicio de Análisis Crítico del Discurso [Thematic structure of news reports on domestic abuse: A Critical Discourse Analysis exercise]. In F. Trujillo Sáez & M.R. Fortes Ruiz (Eds.), Violencia doméstica y coeducación: Un enfoque multidisciplinar [Domestic abuse and coeducation: A multidisciplinary approach] (pp. 157-170). Barcelona: Octaedro.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vallduví, E. (1992). The informational component. New York: Garland.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vallduví,E.,&Engdahl,E.(1996). The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics, 341, 459-519. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Dijk, T. (1981). Sentence topic and discourse topic. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Studies in the pragmatics of discourse (pp. 177-193). The Hague: Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Dijk, T. (2011). Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whittaker, R. (1995). Thematic development in academic and non-academic texts. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Thematic development in English texts (pp. 105-128). London: Pinter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
http://www.elpais.com/articulo/sociedad/hombre/31/anos/mata/mujer/Almeria/elpepusoc/20100218elpepusoc_2/Tes
http://www.elpais.com/articulo/sociedad/Muere/mujer/Madrid/recibir/veintena/punaladas/manos/ex/pareja/elpepusoc/20100121elpepusoc_9/Tes
http://www.elpais.com/articulo/madrid/hombre/mata/cuchilladas/ex/novia/intenta/suicidarse/elpepiespmad/20100219elpmad_5/Tes
http://www.elmundo.es/papel/2010/02/19/espana/22717202.html
http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2010/01/21/madrid/1264081518.html
http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2010/02/18/madrid/1266506242.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/sep/01/strangle-murder-trial-facebook
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/mar/09/facebook-murderer-jailed-paul-bristol
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/mar/30/jealous-father-killed-children
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article6829756.ece
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article7055206.ece
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article7071787.ece