Article published in:
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 28:1 (2015) ► pp. 17–47

English syllabic consonants vs. schwa at discourse level

A perceptual analysis

| Spanish Air Force Academy
| University of Murcia
This is a perceptual study on the production of English syllabic consonants vs. schwa in word final position at discourse level. It is intended to find out whether the speaker’s gender, accent, speech rate and emphasis placed upon words have any bearing on the production of this alternation. The effect the aforementioned factors may have on the production of this apparently anarchic phonetic alternation demands further exploration (see, however, O’Shaughnessy, 1981; Byrd, 1994; Wells, 1995; Töft, 2002). The informants for this study were 80 non-rhotic native newsreaders (40 males and 40 females) taken from the BBC learning English website (2009). Three female listeners not knowledgeable about the purposes of the study had to decide whether they perceived a syllabic consonant in certain words (800 overall) or not. Results show that there is a statistically significant relationship between each of these factors and the production of English syllabic consonants vs. schwa.
Keywords: English syllabic consonant vs. schwa production, discourse, perceptual study, speech rate, accent, gender, word emphasis
Published online: 10 September 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.28.1.02arb
References
Álvarez, J
(1980) Syllabic and non-syllabic /l/ and /n/. Atlantis, 2(1), 41–48.Google Scholar
Arboleda, I., & Monroy, R
(2010) The sociolinguistics of English syllabic consonants: A perceptual study. Paper presented at the 28th International Conference of the Spanish Society for Applied Linguistics (AESLA). University of Vigo, Spain.
Asano, K., & Kiritani, S
n.d.). Phonetic characteristics of unstressed vowels in fast speech [Online]. Retrieved June 2, 2010, from http://​www​.umin​.ac​.jp​/memorial​/rilp​-tokyo​/R26​/R26​_045​.pdf
Ato, M., & López-García, J.J
(1996) Análisis estadístico para datos categóricos. Madrid: Síntesis.Google Scholar
Balasubramanian, T
(1981) Emphasis in Tamil. Journal of Phonetics, 9(2), 139–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bartz, A.E
(1999) Basic statistical concepts. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
BBC learning English website
(2009) [Online]. Retrieved December 8, 2009, from www​.bbc​.co​.uk​/worldservice​/learningenglish​/index​.shtml
BBC radio 4
(2008) Retrieved December 12, 2009, from http://​www​.bbc​.co​.uk​/radio4​/presenters​/#TGoogle Scholar
Bisquerra, R
(1987) Introducción a la estadística aplicada a la investigación educativa. Barcelona: PPU.Google Scholar
Browman, C.P., & Goldstein, L
(1992) Targetless schwa: An articulatory analysis. In G. Docherty & D.R. Ladd (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody (pp. 26–67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byrd, D
(1994) Relations of sex and dialect to reduction. Speech Communication, 151, 39–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cambridge advanced learner’s dictionary
(2008) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carr, P
(1999) A glossary of phonology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Coates, J
(1986) Women, men and language: A sociolinguistic account of sex differences in language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cohen, J
(1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1992) A Power point. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J
(1999) The nature of vocoids associated with syllabic consonants in Tashlhiyt Berber. In J.J. Ohala, Y. Hasegawa, M. Ohala, D. Granville, & A.C. Bailey (Eds.), Proceedings of the XIVth international congress of phonetic sciences. Vol. 11 (pp. 735–738). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(2001) The phonetics and phonology of Tashlhiyt Berber syllabic consonants. Transactions of the Philological Society, 99(1), 29–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, B.S., & Mees, I
(2008) Practical phonetics and phonology: A resource book for students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coloma, C.J., Pávez, M.M, Maggiolo, M., & Peñaloza, C
(2010) Desarrollo fonológico en niños de 3 y 4 años según la fonología natural: Incidencia de edad y el género. Revista Signos, 43(72), 31–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbetta, P
(2003) Social research: Theory, methods and techniques. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, R
(2008) A commercial identity?: The Antipodean image in London. Paper presented at 1st Global Conference. Budapest, Hungary.
Cruttenden, A
(2001) Gimson’s pronunciation of English. Sixth edition revised by A. Cruttenden. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Denzin, N.K
(1979) The research act in sociology. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Deterding, D
(2006) Deletion of final /t/ and /d/ in BBC English: Implications for teachers in Singapore. STETS Language & Communication Review, 5(1), 21–24.Google Scholar
Deuchar, M
(1989) A pragmatic account of women’s use of standard speech. In J. Coates & D. Cameron (Eds.), Women in their speech communities (pp. 27–32). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Diehl, R.L., Lindblom, B., Hoemeke, K.A., & Fahey, R.P
(1996) On explaining certain male-female differences in the phonetic realization of vowel categories. Journal of Phonetics, 241, 187–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z
(2007) Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, P
(1997) Gender and sociolinguistic variation. In J. Coates (Ed.), Readings in language and gender (pp. 64–75). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Field, A
(2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fleiss, J.L
(1971) Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giegerich, H.J
(1992) English phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gimson, A.C
(1970) An introduction to the pronunciation of English. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Gravetter, F.J., & Wallnau, L.B
(1996) Statistics for the behavioral sciences: A first course for students of psychology and education. Minneapolis: West.Google Scholar
Jannedy, S
(1994) Rate effects on German unstressed syllables. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics, 441, 105–124.Google Scholar
Jannedy, S., Fuchs, S., & Weirich, M
(2008) Schwa out of control? In R. Sock, S. Fuchs, & Y. Laprie (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international seminar on speech production (pp. 129–132). Strasbourg: Université March Bloch.Google Scholar
Jones, D
(2006 [1917]) (Ed. by P. Roach, J. Hartman, & J. Setter). English pronouncing dictionary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kenyon, J.S
(1956) Syllabic consonants in dictionaries. American Speech, 31(4), 243–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y
(2005) Syllabic consonants in early English. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology, 12(2), 283–305.Google Scholar
Landis, J.R., & Koch, G.G
(1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 331, 159–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, I
(1964) Acoustical characteristics of selected English consonants. International Journal of American Linguistics, 30, 3, 194–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacCarthy, P
(1965) A practice book of English speech. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McMahon, A
(2000) Lexical phonology and the history of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mompeán, P., & Mompeán, J.A
(2006) Intrusive /r/ usage in RP: The case of BBC newsreaders. Paper presented at V International Conference of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics. Murcia, Spain.Google Scholar
Monroy, R
(1980) La pronunciación del inglés RP para hablantes de español. Madrid: Paraninfo.Google Scholar
(2008-2009) Fonética inglesa [Class handout]. Murcia: University of Murcia.Google Scholar
Mora, J.C
(2003) The formation of syllabic consonants and their distribution in Southern British English. Atlantis, 25(2), 97–112.Google Scholar
Morris, R.J., McCrea, C.R., & Herring, K.D
(2008) Voice onset time differences between adult males and females: Isolated syllables. Journal of Phonetics, 36(2), 308–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, P.C., Akagi, M., & Nguyen, B.P
(2007) Limited error based event localizing temporal decomposition and its application to variable-rate speech coding. Speech Communication, 491, 292–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortleb, R
(1937) An objective study of emphasis in oral reading of emotional and unemotional material. Speech Monographs, 41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, D
(1981) A study of French vowel and consonant durations. Journal of Phonetics, 91, 385–406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Price, J
n.d.). New news old news: A sociophonetic study of spoken Australian English in news broadcast speech. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 33(2), 285–310.
Roach, P
(1987) English phonetics and phonology: A practical course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2000) English phonetics and phonology: A practical course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) A little encyclopedia of phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rockey, D
(1973) Phonetic lexicon. London: Heyden & Son Ltd.Google Scholar
Shockey, L
(2003) Sound patterns of spoken English. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
SPSS, Inc., an IBM Company
(1989, 2010) IBM SPSS statistics version 19.0.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc., an IBM Company., Inc.Google Scholar
Töft, Z
(2002) The phonetics and phonology of some syllabic consonants in Southern British English. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 281, 111–44.Google Scholar
Trask, R.L
(1996) Dictionary of phonetics and phonology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P
(1974) The social differentiation of English in Norwich. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Upton, C., Kretzschmar, W.A., & Konopka, R
(2003) The Oxford dictionary of pronunciation for current English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van Bergem, D.R
(1995) Perceptual and acoustic aspects of lexical vowel reduction, a sound change in progress. Speech Communication, 16(4), 329–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Oostendorp, M
(1995) Vowel quantity and phonological projection. Doctoral Dissertation, Tilburg University, Netherlands [ROA-84-000].Google Scholar
Wells, J.C
(1965) The phonological status of syllabic consonants in English RP. Phonetica, 131, 110–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1982) Accents of English. Vol. 1 & 31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) New syllabic consonants in English. In J. Windsor-Lewis (Ed.), Studies in general and English phonetics: Essays in honour of Professor J. D. O’Connor (pp. 401–412). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2000) Longman pronunciation dictionary. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Windsor Lewis, J
(1990) Twentieth-century changes in British pronunciation [Online]. Retrieved November 13, 2009, from The Home “Page” of Windsor Lewis: http://​www​.yek​.me​.uk​/changestwe​.htmlGoogle Scholar