Book review
L. Gil-Salom & C. Soler-Monreal (Eds.). Dialogicity in written specialised genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2014. ISBN 9789027210401 227 pp. https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.23
References (27)
References
Bakhtin, M. (1986). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. edited by M. Holquist. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D. (2006). Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 97–116. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carter, M. (2007). Ways of doing, knowing and writing in the disciplines. College Composition and Communication, 581, 385–418.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gray, B., & Biber, D. (2012). Current conceptions of stance. In K. Hyland & C. Sancho-Guinda (eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp. 15–33). London: Palgrave. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haugh, M. (2014). Jocular mockery as interactional practice in everyday Anglo-Australian conversation. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 34(1), 76–99. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haugh, M., & Chang, W. (2013). Collaborative creation of spoken language corpora. In T. Greer, Y. Kite, & D. Tatsuki (eds.), Pragmatics and language learning (pp. 119–146). Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Centre, University of Hawai’i.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (eds.) (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, K. (1999). Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In C. N. Candlin & K. Hyland (eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 99–121). London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse. London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, K., & Sancho-Guinda, C. (eds.). (2012). Stance and voice in academic writing. London: Palgrave. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Partington, A. (2008). Teasing at the White House: A corpus-assisted study of face work in performing and responding to teases. Text and Talk, 281, 771–772. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Santamaría García, C. (2013). The discourse of social networking sites in Student communication with peers. In S. Molina & A. Roldán (eds.), RESLA, Special issue (Communications and learning context in LSP: New perspectives on genre analysis), 123–142![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Santini, M. (2007). Automatic identification of genre in web pages. PhD thesis, University of Brighton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swales, J. (2004). Research genres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, G., & Ye, Y. (1991). Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 365–382. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thurlow, C. (2001). Language and the internet. In M. Rejend & R. Asher (eds.), The concise encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics (pp. 287–289). London: Pergamon.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Walsh, S. (2013). Corpus linguistics and conversation analysis at the interface: theoretical perspectives, practical outcomes. In J. Romero-Trillo (ed.), Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics. Vol 11 (pp. 37–51). Berlin: Springer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga, Martin Adam, Renata Povolná & Radek Vogel
2020.
Persuasive Strategies Across the Academic, Business, Religious and Technical Discourses. In
Persuasion in Specialised Discourses,
► pp. 39 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Povolná, Renata
2020.
Persuasion in Technical Discourse: The Role of Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers in User Manuals. In
Persuasion in Specialised Discourses,
► pp. 229 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.