Review published In:
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied LinguisticsVol. 28:2 (2015) ► pp.647–654
Vol. 28:2 (2015) ► pp.647–654
Book review
. Dialogicity in written specialised genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2014. ISBN 9789027210401 227 pp. https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.23
Reviewed by
References (27)
Bakhtin, M. (1986). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. edited by M. Holquist. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
Biber, D. (2006). Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 97–116. 
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carter, M. (2007). Ways of doing, knowing and writing in the disciplines. College Composition and Communication, 581, 385–418.
Gray, B., & Biber, D. (2012). Current conceptions of stance. In K. Hyland & C. Sancho-Guinda (eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp. 15–33). London: Palgrave.
Haugh, M. (2014). Jocular mockery as interactional practice in everyday Anglo-Australian conversation. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 34(1), 76–99.
Haugh, M., & Chang, W. (2013). Collaborative creation of spoken language corpora. In T. Greer, Y. Kite, & D. Tatsuki (eds.), Pragmatics and language learning (pp. 119–146). Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Centre, University of Hawai’i.
Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (eds.) (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K. (1999). Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In C. N. Candlin & K. Hyland (eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 99–121). London: Longman.
(2009). Academic discourse. London: Continuum.
Hyland, K., & Sancho-Guinda, C. (eds.). (2012). Stance and voice in academic writing. London: Palgrave.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Partington, A. (2008). Teasing at the White House: A corpus-assisted study of face work in performing and responding to teases. Text and Talk, 281, 771–772.
Santamaría-García, C. (2011). Bricolage assembling: CL, CA and DA to explore the negotiation of agreement in English and Spanish conversation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(3), 346–371.
Santamaría García, C. (2013). The discourse of social networking sites in Student communication with peers. In S. Molina & A. Roldán (eds.), RESLA, Special issue (Communications and learning context in LSP: New perspectives on genre analysis), 123–142
Santamaría-García, C. (2014). Evaluative discourse and politeness in university students’ communication through social networking sites. In G. Thompson & L. Alba-Juez (eds.), Evaluation in context (pp. 387–411). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Santini, M. (2007). Automatic identification of genre in web pages. PhD thesis, University of Brighton.
Swales, J. (2004). Research genres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, G., & Alba-Juez, L. (eds.). (2014) Evaluation in context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thompson, G., & Ye, Y. (1991). Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 365–382.
Thurlow, C. (2001). Language and the internet. In M. Rejend & R. Asher (eds.), The concise encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics (pp. 287–289). London: Pergamon.
Walsh, S. (2013). Corpus linguistics and conversation analysis at the interface: theoretical perspectives, practical outcomes. In J. Romero-Trillo (ed.), Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics. Vol 11 (pp. 37–51). Berlin: Springer.
Weigand, E. (ed.) (2008a). Dialogue and rhetoric. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2008b). Rhetoric in the mixed game. In E. Weigand (ed.) Dialogue and rhetoric (pp. 3–22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2009). Language as dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2010). Dialogue: The mixed game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga, Martin Adam, Renata Povolná & Radek Vogel
2020. Persuasive Strategies Across the Academic, Business, Religious and Technical Discourses. In Persuasion in Specialised Discourses, ► pp. 39 ff. 
Povolná, Renata
2020. Persuasion in Technical Discourse: The Role of Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers in User Manuals. In Persuasion in Specialised Discourses, ► pp. 229 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.