Cover not available
Review published In:
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 28:2 (2015) ► pp.647–654
Book review

L. Gil-Salom & C. Soler-Monreal (Eds.). Dialogicity in written specialised genres
Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2014. ISBN 9789027210401 227 pp. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1075​/ds​.23

Reviewed by
| University of Alcalá
Published online: 19 February 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.28.2.12san
References
Bakhtin, M.
(1986) The dialogic imagination: Four essays. edited by M. Holquist. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D.
(2006) Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 97–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, M.
(2007) Ways of doing, knowing and writing in the disciplines. College Composition and Communication, 581, 385–418.Google Scholar
Gray, B., & Biber, D.
(2012) Current conceptions of stance. In K. Hyland & C. Sancho-Guinda (eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp. 15–33). London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, M.
(2014) Jocular mockery as interactional practice in everyday Anglo-Australian conversation. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 34(1), 76–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, M., & Chang, W.
(2013) Collaborative creation of spoken language corpora. In T. Greer, Y. Kite, & D. Tatsuki (eds.), Pragmatics and language learning (pp. 119–146). Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Centre, University of Hawai’i.Google Scholar
Hunston, S., & Thompson, G.
(eds.) (2000) Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, K.
(1999) Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In C. N. Candlin & K. Hyland (eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 99–121). London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2009) Academic discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hyland, K., & Sancho-Guinda, C.
(eds.) (2012) Stance and voice in academic writing. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R.
(2005) The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, A.
(2008) Teasing at the White House: A corpus-assisted study of face work in performing and responding to teases. Text and Talk, 281, 771–772. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santamaría-García, C.
(2011) Bricolage assembling: CL, CA and DA to explore the negotiation of agreement in English and Spanish conversation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(3), 346–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santamaría García, C.
(2013) The discourse of social networking sites in Student communication with peers. In S. Molina & A. Roldán (eds.), RESLA, Special issue (Communications and learning context in LSP: New perspectives on genre analysis), 123–142Google Scholar
Santamaría-García, C.
(2014) Evaluative discourse and politeness in university students’ communication through social networking sites. In G. Thompson & L. Alba-Juez (eds.), Evaluation in context (pp. 387–411). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santini, M.
(2007) Automatic identification of genre in web pages. PhD thesis, University of Brighton.Google Scholar
Swales, J.
(2004) Research genres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, G., & Alba-Juez, L.
(eds.) (2014) Evaluation in context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, G., & Ye, Y.
(1991) Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 365–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, C.
(2001) Language and the internet. In M. Rejend & R. Asher (eds.), The concise encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics (pp. 287–289). London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Walsh, S.
(2013) Corpus linguistics and conversation analysis at the interface: theoretical perspectives, practical outcomes. In J. Romero-Trillo (ed.), Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics. Vol 11 (pp. 37–51). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Weigand, E.
(ed.) (2008a) Dialogue and rhetoric. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008b) Rhetoric in the mixed game. In E. Weigand (ed.) Dialogue and rhetoric (pp. 3–22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Language as dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Dialogue: The mixed game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, F.
(2011) Cyberpragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga, Martin Adam, Renata Povolná & Radek Vogel
2020. Persuasive Strategies Across the Academic, Business, Religious and Technical Discourses. In Persuasion in Specialised Discourses, ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Povolná, Renata
2020. Persuasion in Technical Discourse: The Role of Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers in User Manuals. In Persuasion in Specialised Discourses, ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.