Linguistic modality is the expression of the speaker’s subjectivity including possibility, probability, necessity, obligation, permission, prohibition, and desire. This paper analyses a learner English corpus collected at two Spanish universities, paying special attention to which linguistic devices (e.g., modal verbs, adjectives, adverbs or nouns) English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students make use of when providing for and against arguments in their assignments. Applying a corpus-based methodology not only enabled comparisons to be made with other native and non-native data but also facilitated both quantitative and qualitative analyses. The findings show remarkable similarities and differences, and leave several issues at stake: the relationship between the degree of assertiveness of a text and (1) the student’s gender, (2) their command of the Foreign Language (FL), and (3) their familiarity with the genre they are expected to write in.
(2008) Variation of language strategies among Iranian English students: The effect of gender. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 4(3), 72–87.
(1995) Modifying meanings: Modality and argumentation in students’ written answers to a legal problem. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 181, 59–72.
(2014) Modality in Arab EFL students’ academic writing: Implications for policy, practice, and research. In K.M. Damerow & R.M. Bailey (Eds.), Teaching and learning English in the Arabic-speaking world (pp. 14–31). New York: Routledge.
Amanatullah, E., & Morris, M.W
(2010) Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 256–267.
(2011) Counterfactual-style revisions in the semantics of deontic modals. Journal of Semantics, 28(2), 171–210.
(2008) Sexed texts: Language, gender and sexuality. London: Equinox.
(2014) Using corpora to analyze gender. London: Bloomsbury.
(1999) Dynamic modality in Mari. Linguistica Uralica, 35(1), 22–34.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E
(1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Bijari, J., Mehrdad, A.G., & Karimi, L
(2014) A corpus based study of the relationship among the Iranian EFL students’ gender, language proficiency, and cross-cultural knowledge of apologizing and requesting. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(9), 1954–1960.
(2010) Semantic maps and the identification of cross-linguistic generic categories: Evidentiality and its relation to epistemic modality. Linguistic Discovery, 8(1), 4–22.
(1987) The effect of culture and gender on self-reported assertive behavior. International Journal of Psychology, 22(1), 83–95.
Fox, A.B., Bukatko, D., Hallahan, M., & Crawford, M
(2007) The medium makes a difference. Gender similarities and differences in instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(4), 389–397.
(2010) A corpus-based examination of English if-conditionals through the lens of modality: Nature and types. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Lancaster.
Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T
(2005) Epistemic modality in MA dissertations. In P.A. Fuertes Olivera (Ed.), Lengua y sociedad: Investigaciones recientes en lingüística aplicada. Lingüística y filología, 611 (pp. 311–331). Valladolid: University of Valladolid.
(1990) Second language acquisition of the English modal auxiliaries can, could, may, and might. Applied Linguistics, 11(3), 297–314.
(2007) Dynamic modality. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 4(2), 44–61.
(2006) ‘Doing femininity’ at work: More than just relational practice. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(1), 31–51.
Hyland, K., & Milton, J
(1997) Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2), 183–205.
Huddleston, R.D., & Pullum, G.K
(2002) The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1989) Evaluation in experimental research articles. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham, Retrieved March 25, 2012, from [URL].
Iatridou, S., & Zeijlstra, H
(2013) Negation, polarity, and deontic modals. Linguistic Inquiry, 44(4), 529–568.
(1995) English syntax: A grammar for English language professionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(1922) Language: Its nature, development and origin. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Jiménez Catalán, R.M
(Ed.) (2010) Gender perspectives on vocabulary in foreign and second languages. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
(2014) Study on gender differences in language under the sociolinguistics. Canadian Social Science, 10(3), 92–96.
Kader, M.I.B.A., Begi, N., & Vaseghi, R
(2013) A corpus-based study of Malaysian ESL learners’ use of modals in argumentative compositions. English Language Teaching, 6(9), 146–157.
(1992) Modality as a strategy in interaction: Epistemic modality in the language of native and non-native speakers of English. Pragmatics and Language Learning, 31, 197–216.
(1994) Modality. In R.E. Asher (Ed.), The encyclopaedia of language and linguistics (pp. 2515–2520). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
(2011) Personal style and epistemic stance in classroom discussion. Language and Literature, 20(3), 207–217.
(2010) In pursuit of a description of modality: A comprehensive review of linguistic modality. Retrieved December 5, 2010, from [URL].
(1975) Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
(Ed.) (2005) Feminist critical discourse analysis: Gender, power and ideology in discourse. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
(1987) Morphological factors influencing pronominal reference assignment by learners of Spanish. In T. Morgan, J.F. Lee, & B. VanPatten (Eds.), Language and language use: Studies in Spanish (pp. 221–232). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
(2006) Epistemic modality markers in research articles: A cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 61–87.
(2002) Gender, language and discourse. New York: Routledge.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D.H
(1983) Small insults: A study of interruptions in conversations between unacquainted persons. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender and society (pp. 102–117). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
2023. Corpus-Based Lexical Development of EFL Writing. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Diversified Education and Social Development (DESD 2022), ► pp. 53 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.