References

References

Adjemian, C.
(1976) On the nature of interlanguage systems. Language Learning, 26, 297–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, A., & Anagnostopoulou, E.
(1998) Parameterizing Agr: Word order, v-movement and EPP checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 491–539. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R.
(1983) Transfer to somewhere. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer and language learning (pp. 177–191). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1990) Models, processes, principles and strategies: Second language acquisition inside and outside the classroom. In B. VanPatten & J.F. Lee (Eds.), Second language acquisition/Foreign language learning (pp. 45–68). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Azpiazu, S.
(2004) Reflexiones en torno al clítico “se” en español. Estudios de Lingüística, 18, 7–20.Google Scholar
Barbosa, P.
(1995) Null subjects. Ph.D. Dissertation. MIT.Google Scholar
(1996) Clitic placement in European Portuguese and the position of subjects. In A. Halpern & A. Zwicky (Eds.), Approaching second: Second position clitics and related phenomena (pp. 1–40). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
(2000) Clitics: A window into the null subject property. In J. Costa (Ed.), Portuguese syntax: Comparative studies (pp. 31–93). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burzio, L.
(1986) Italian syntax: A government and binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1981) Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
(1995) The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2001a) Beyond explanatory adequacy. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 20, 1–28.Google Scholar
(2001b) Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowich (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
De Miguel, E., & Fernández Lagunilla, M.
(2002) El operador aspectual se . Revista Española de Lingüística, 30(1), 13–43.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2005) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Escutia, M.
(1990) Aspects of the acquisition of Spanish reflexive pronouns by English speaking students of Spanish as a foreign language. Thesis. University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
(1992) Aspectos de la adquisición de pronombres reflexivos españoles por estudiantes de español como lengua extranjera. In F. Gutiérrez Díez (Ed.), El español, lengua internacional (1492-1992) (pp. 197–204). Granada/Murcia: AESLA.Google Scholar
(1993) Homogeneous vs heterogeneous competence in the L2 acquisition of non-null subjects: A case study. In Actas de las Jornadas Internacionales de Lingüística Aplicada, Vol. 2 (pp. 509–519). Granada: Universidad de Granada.Google Scholar
(1998) Variability and non-variability in the English L2 acquisition of an adult Spanish speaker. Perspectives on Spanish Linguistics, 2, 25–43.Google Scholar
(1998-1999) Primeros pasos en la adquisición de los pronombres átonos españoles por estudiantes angloparlantes adultos. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 13, 139–175.Google Scholar
(2008) Transfer and universal grammar in unaccusative construction errors. Miscelánea, 37, 23–38.Google Scholar
Escutia M.
(2010) El uso de se con verbos inacusativos por estudiantes avanzados de español como lengua extranjera: Transferencia y restructuración. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 23, 129–152.Google Scholar
Escutia, M.
(2012) Expletives and unaccusative predicates in L2A. Higher Education of Social Science, 2(3), 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández Soriano, O., & Mendikoetxea, A.
(2011) Non-selected dative subjects in anticausative constructions. Archivio glottologico italiano, 96(1), 87–127.Google Scholar
Flynn, S.
(1987) Contrast and construction in a parameter setting model of L2 acquisition. Language Learning, 37, 19–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Franceschina, F.
(2001) Morphological or syntactic deficits in near-native speakers? An assessment of some current proposals. Second Language Research, 17(3), 213–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S.
(1979) Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Learning, 29, 327–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Chan, C.Y.H.
(1997) The partial availability of universal grammar in second language acquisition: The failed functional features hypothesis. Second Language Research, 13, 187–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirakawa, M.
(1995) L2 acquisition of English unaccusative constructions. In D. MacClaughlin & S. McEwen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Boston University Conference on Language Development, 1 (pp. 291–303). Somerville: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
(2001) L2 acquisition of Japanese unaccusative verbs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 221–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kadmon, N.
(2001) Formal pragmatics: Semantics, pragmatics, presupposition and focus. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kato, M.A.
(1999) Strong pronouns and weak pronominals in the null subject parameter. Probus, 11(1), 1–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D.
(2008) Feature-assembly in second language acquisition. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The role of features in second language acquisition (pp. 106–140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Levin, B., & Rappaport-Hovav, M.
(1995) Unaccusativity: At the lexical syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Liceras, J.M.
(1989) On some properties of the “pro-drop” parameter: Looking for missing subjects in non-native Spanish. In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp.109–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liceras, J.M., Díaz, L., Maxwell, D., Laguardia, B., & Fernández, R.
(1997) A longitudinal study of Spanish non-native grammars: Beyond parameters. In A.T. Pérez-Leroux & W.R. Glass (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish, vol. 1: Developing grammars (pp. 99–132). Somerville: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Lozano, C.
(2006) Focus and split intransitivity: The acquisition of word order alternations in non-native Spanish. Second Language Research, 22(2), 1–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) CEDEL2: Corpus escrito del español L2. In C.M. Bretones Callejas et al. (Eds.), Applied linguistics now: Understanding language and mind/La lingüística aplicada hoy: Comprendiendo el lenguaje y la mente (pp. 197–212). Almería: Universidad de Almería.Google Scholar
Lozano, C., & Mendikoetxea, A.
(2008) Postverbal subjects at the interfaces in Spanish and Italian learners of L2 English: A corpus study. In G. Gilquin, S Papp, & B. Díez (Eds)., Linking up contrastive and learner corpus research (pp. 88–125). Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Interface conditions on postverbal subjects: A corpus study of L2 English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(4), 475–497. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, I.
(2006) Unaccusative verbs in Romance languages. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mendikoetxea, A.
(1999) Construcciones inacusativas y pasivas. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española 2 (pp. 1575–1630). Madrid: Real Academia Española/Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Montrul, S.
(2004) The acquisition of Spanish: Morphosyntactic development in monolingual and bilingual L1 acquisition and in adult L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) On knowledge and development of unaccusativity in Spanish L2 acquisition. Linguistics, 43(6), 1153–1190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oshita, H.
(2000) What is happened may not be what appears to be happening: A corpus study of passive unaccusatives in L2 English. Second Language Research, 16, 293–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Is there anything there when there is not there?: Null expletives and second language data. Second Language Research, 20, 95–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perales, S., & Liceras, J.M.
(2009). Unexpected constructions in SLA: A diachronic approach. In M. Bowles et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (pp. 25–34). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D.
(1978) Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society (pp. 175–189). Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Phinney, M.
(1987) The pro-drop parameter in second language acquisition. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (Eds.), Parameter setting (pp. 221–246). Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radford, A.
(2009): Analysing English sentences: A minimalist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L.
(1982) Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1990) Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, W.
(1989) Interlanguage and pragmatic word order. In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistc perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 109–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, C.T.
(1996) The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistics methodology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B.D., & Sprouse, R.
(1994) Word order and nominative case in non-native language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In T. Hoekstra & B.D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 317–368). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selinker L.
(1972) Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slavkov, N.
(2009) The acquisition of complex wh-questions in the L2 English of Canadian French and Bulgarian speakers: Medial wh-constructions, inversion phenomena and avoidance strategies. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Slobin, D.I.
(1985) Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In D.I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 2 (pp. 1157–1256). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Smith, N., & Tsimpli, I.M.
(1995) The mind of a savant. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sorace, A., & Serratrice, L.
(2009) Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 195–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sportiche, D.
(1996) Clitic constructions. In L. Zaring & J. Rooryck (Eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp. 213–276). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teomiro, I.
(2010) Anaphors at the interfaces. Doctoral dissertation. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
(2013) Low applicatives and optional “se” in Spanish non-anticausative intransitive verbs. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 8, 248–270.Google Scholar
Teomiro, I., & Escobar, L.
(2013) The acquisition of dative “se” in L1 Spanish and its implications for the weak continuity hypothesis of acquisition of functional categories. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 26, 475–490.Google Scholar
Toth, P.D.
(1999) Preemption in instructed learners of Spanish as a foreign language: Acquiring a rule for SE. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 3, 195–246.Google Scholar
Toth, P.
(2000) The interaction of instruction and learner-internal factors in the acquisition of L2 morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 169–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I.M., & Dimitrakopoulou, M.
(2007) The interpretability hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 23(2), 215–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T.
(1993) Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 225–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, L.
(1985) The ‘pro-drop’ parameter in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning, 35, 47–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitley, M.S.
(2002) Spanish/English contrasts. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Zobl, H.
(1989) Canonical typological structures and ergativity in English L2 acquisition. In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 109–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zyzik, E.
(2006) Transitivity alternations and sequence learning: Insights from L2 Spanish production data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 449–485. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

García-Tejada, Aída, Alejandro Cuza & Eduardo Gerardo Lustres Alonso
2021. The production and comprehension of Spanish se use in L2 and heritage Spanish. Second Language Research  pp. 026765832110165 ff. Crossref logo
Peace, Meghann M.
2020. L2 Spanish clitic pronouns. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 11:1  pp. 99 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.