Article published in:
The Acquisition and Processing of Spanish and Portuguese Morphosyntax: Theoretical and experimental issues
Edited by Rachel Klassen, Anahí Alba de la Fuente, Joanne Markle LaMontagne and Almudena Basanta y Romero-Valdespino
[Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 29:2] 2016
► pp. 582–612

Negative doubling in the Italo-Mexican community of Chipilo, Mexico

| University of Toronto
This study describes the phenomenon of negative doubling in Chipilo, Mexico. It has been hypothesized that Italo-Mexican bilinguals who speak Veneto (L1) and Spanish (L2) have transferred a second final no (no fui no ‘I did not go NEG’) from their L1 into Spanish, a language that does not allow a repetition of the same negator in the postverbal position. This study analysed the data of 49 participants (Chipileños, mixed groups, and monolingual speakers) classified into two sex groups and four ethnicity groups, who performed a preference forced choice task and a repetition task. The results suggest a transfer effect from L1 to L2 in the bilinguals’ speech, specifically in the discourse of males. Second negative mention and verbs as previous constituents had a strong effect on elicitation of negation doubling.
Keywords: transfer, Mexico, minority language maintenance, Chipilo, Veneto, negative doubling
Published online: 02 February 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.29.2.08tar
References

References

Barnes, H.
(2009) A sociolinguistic study of sustained Veneto-Spanish bilingualism in Chipilo, Mexico. Ph.D. Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Barnes, H., & Michnowicz, J.
(2013) Peak alignment in semi-spontaneous bilingual Chipilo Spanish. In A M. Carvalho & S. Beaudrie (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 6th workshop on Spanish sociolinguistics (pp. 109–122). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
(2015) Broad focus declaratives in Veneto-Spanish bilinguals: Peak alignment and language contact. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 8(1), 35–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, T., & Cyrino, S.
(2009a) Negative developments in Afrikaans and Brazilian Portuguese. Paper presented at the 19th Colloquium on Generative Grammar , University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz.
(2009b) Appearances are deceptive: Jespersen’s Cycle from the perspective of the Romania Nova and Romance-based Creoles. Paper presented at Going Romance 23 , University of Nice.
Cuervo, C., & Mazzaro, N.
(2013) Duplicacion de la negación en el español de Corrientes. In L. Colantoni & C. Rodríguez Louro (Eds.), Perspectivas teóricas y experimentales sobre el español de la Argentina (pp. 1–14). Madrid: Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Lavandera, B.
(1978) Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in Society 7, 171–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacKay, C.
(1992) Language maintenance in Chipilo: A Veneto dialect in Mexico. International Journal of Social Language, 96, 129–145.Google Scholar
Mackay, C.J.
(1999) Dos casos de mantenimiento linguistico en Mexico: El totonaco y el véneto. In A. Herzfeld & Y Lastra (Eds.), Las causas sociales de la desaparicion y mantenimiento de las lenguas en las Americas (pp. 77–98). Hermosillo, Sonora: Universidad de Sonora, Oficina de Publicaciones.Google Scholar
MacKay, C.J.
(2002) Il dialetto Veneto di Segusino e Chipilo: Fonologia, grammatica, lessico veneto, spagnolo, italiano. Cornuda, Treviso: Grafiche Antiga.Google Scholar
Martínez, C.
(2006) Concordancia de negación en el portugués minero. Pterodáctilo, 3, 26–35.Google Scholar
Milroy, L., & Gordon, M.J.
(2003) Sociolinguistics: Method and interpretation. Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Real Academia Española
(2010) La negación. In Nueva gramática de la lengua española: Manual. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Romani, P.
(1992) Conservación del idioma en una comunidad italo-mexicana. México, DF: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
Sánchez López, C.
(1999) La negación. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp.1561–2634). Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G., & Vincent, D.
(1980) The productive use of ne in spoken Montreal French. In G. Sankoff (Eds.), The social life of language (pp. 295–310). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, S.A.
(2005) The Pragmatics of negation in Brazilian Portuguese. Lingua, 115(10), 1427–1456. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Fine-tuning Jespersen’s cycle. In J. Berner & G. Ward (Eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn (pp. 327–344). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tararova, O.
(2012) A study of in-group and out-group attitudes in an Italo-Mexican community, Chipilo. Master’s thesis. Retrieved from the Atrium at the University of Guelph. http://​dspace​.lib​.uoguelph​.ca​/xmlui​/browse​?value​=Tararova%2C+Olga​&type​=authorGoogle Scholar
(2014) No hablo italiano (no). Poster presented at the 44th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL) , London, Ontario.
Teixeira de Sousa, L.
(2011) Sentential negation in Brazilian Portuguese: Pragmatics and syntax. JournaLipp, 1, 89–103.Google Scholar
Thomason, S.G.
(2001) Language contact: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, S.G., & Kaufman, T.
(1988) Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Winford, D.
(2003) An introduction to contact linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zago Bronca, J.A.
(1982) Breve historia de la fundación de Chipilo. Chipilo: Imprenta Venecia.Google Scholar
(2007) Los Cuah’tatarame de Chipíloc. 2nd Ed.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, R.
(1997) Negation and clausal structure: A comparative study of Romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Tararova, Olga
2020. Pragmatic Uses of Negation in Chipileño Spanish (Mexico). Languages 5:3 ► pp. 28 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.