Some Complex Event Nominals (CENs) like the Romanian infinitive contradict the generalization in Grimshaw (1990) according to which CENs do not pluralize. But many CENs like the Romanian supine and the Spanish nominal infinitive obey this generalization. In this paper we explain the availability and the blocking of pluralization in relation to the internal structure of the CEN. We argue that pluralization in CENs is blocked by the syntactic encoding of the unbounded outer or inner aspect. The Romanian supine projects a verbal structure with a [–bounded] (outer) Aspect projection. In the Spanish nominal infinitive, the unbounded/atelic inner aspect is accommodated by a [–count] Classifier projection in a nominal structure. Both patterns prevent the projection of Number, and thus, pluralization. But this does not exclude the availability of plural for CENs with a bounded/telic inner aspect which project a [+count] ClassifierP and implicitly, NumberP, as in the case of Romanian infinitival CENs.
2013. The realization of external arguments in nominalizations. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 16:2-3 ► pp. 73 ff.
Beauseroy, Delphine & Marie Laurence Knittel
2012. Number and Adjectives: the Case of French Activity and Quality Nominals*. Studia Linguistica 66:3 ► pp. 207 ff.
ALEXIADOU, ARTEMIS, GIANINA IORDĂCHIOAIA & ELENA SOARE
2010. Number/aspect interactions in the syntax of nominalizations: A Distributed approach. Journal of Linguistics 46:3 ► pp. 537 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.