Article published in:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Amsterdam 2007
Edited by Enoch Oladé Aboh, Elisabeth van der Linden, Josep Quer and Petra Sleeman
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 1] 2009
► pp. 145–160
Structural patterns blocking plural in Romance nominalizations
Some Complex Event Nominals (CENs) like the Romanian infinitive contradict the generalization in Grimshaw (1990) according to which CENs do not pluralize. But many CENs like the Romanian supine and the Spanish nominal infinitive obey this generalization. In this paper we explain the availability and the blocking of pluralization in relation to the internal structure of the CEN. We argue that pluralization in CENs is blocked by the syntactic encoding of the unbounded outer or inner aspect. The Romanian supine projects a verbal structure with a [–bounded] (outer) Aspect projection. In the Spanish nominal infinitive, the unbounded/atelic inner aspect is accommodated by a [–count] Classifier projection in a nominal structure. Both patterns prevent the projection of Number, and thus, pluralization. But this does not exclude the availability of plural for CENs with a bounded/telic inner aspect which project a [+count] ClassifierP and implicitly, NumberP, as in the case of Romanian infinitival CENs.
Published online: 19 November 2009
Cited by other publications
Alexiadou, Artemis, Gianina Iordăchioaia, Mariángeles Cano, Fabienne Martin & Florian Schäfer
ALEXIADOU, ARTEMIS, GIANINA IORDĂCHIOAIA & ELENA SOARE
Beauseroy, Delphine & Marie Laurence Knittel
Iordachioaia, Gianina & Elena Soare
KNITTEL, MARIE LAURENCE
Lowe, John J.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.