Can the well-known verb-framed/satellite-framed variation observed by Talmy (1975 et seq.) be productively analyzed as a true parameter, or is it in fact something else, perhaps a morphological tendency of individual lexical items in a given language? Here we defend the view that it is indeed a parameter, of a well-understood type: a head-movement parameter. We claim that it results from the variety of uninterpretable feature that is bundled with the flavor of v which is used in change-of-state constructions. The technical apparatus employed is another instance of a typical head-movement parameter, of the kind that accounts for the familiar V-to-T or T-to-C parameters. In verb-framed languages, head-movement to change-of-state v0 is mandatory, just as head-movement to finite T0 is mandatory in V-to-T languages. The approach, in contrast to previous analyses, does not ascribe a deficiency to verb-framed languages, either in their semantic composition inventory, or their inventory of structural operations, both of which seem prima facie implausible from a biolinguistic/Minimalist perspective.
2010Argument structure and the syntax-morphology interface. A case study in Latin and other languages. PhD. thesis, Universitat de Barcelona.
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor
2012 “A layered-derivation approach to conflation”. Ms, Cambridge University. [URL]
Adger, David
2003Core syntax. Oxford: OUP.
Alexiadou, Artemis, and Elena Anagnostopoulou
2011 “Decomposing the Greek Verb”. Talk presented at
Approaches to the lexicon: Roots III
, June 16, 2011, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Asyllogistou, Athanasia
2015 “Result in prefixed verbs in the diachrony of Greek. Evidence from Homeric and Classical Greek”, Handout from The diachrony of Satellite and Verb framed languages
, Ulster University workshop, October 16th 2015.
Beavers, John, and Andrew Koontz-Garboden
2012 “Manner and result in the roots of verbal meaning”. Linguistic Inquiry 43 (3): 331–369.
Beavers, John, Beth Levin, and Shiao Wei Tham
2010 “The typology of motion expressions revisited.” Journal of Linguistics 46: 331–377.
Beck, Sigrid, and William Snyder
2001 “Complex predicates and goal PP's: Evidence for a semantic parameter.” In Proceedings of the 25th Boston University Conference on Language Development, ed. by Anna H.-J. Do, Laura Dominguez, and Aimee Johansen, 114–122. MA: Cascadilla Press.
Borer, Hagit
1984Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Borer, Hagit
1994 “The projection of arguments.” In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17, ed. by Elena Benedicto, and Jeffrey Runner, 19–47. Amerst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
Borer, Hagit
2005The Normal Course of Events. Structuring Sense, Volume II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, Noam
1993 “A Minimalist program for linguistic theory”. In The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. By Kenneth L. Hale, and Samuel Jay Keyser, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam
2000 “Minimalist inquiries: the framework.” In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam
2001 “Derivation by phase.” In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Embick, David, and Rolf Noyer
2001 “Movement operations after syntax.” Linguistic Inquiry 32 (4): 555–595.
Embick, David
2010Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
Folli, Raffaella, and Harley Heidi
2004 “Flavors of v: Consuming results in Italian and English.” In Aspectual Inquiries, ed. by Roumyana Slabakova, and Paula Kempchinsky, 95–120. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Folli, Raffaella, and Heidi Harley
2007 “Causation, obligation and argument structure: On the nature of little v.” Linguistic Inquiry 38 (2): 197–238.
Folli, Raffaella, and Heidi Harley
in prep. “A head-movement approach to the manner-of-motion parameter”. Ms, University of Ulster, University of Arizona.
Folli, Raffaella
2001Constructing Telicity in English and Italian. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oxford.
Harley, Heidi
1995Subjects, Events and Licensing. PhD dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Harley, Heidi
2005 “How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, Manner Incorporation and the ontology of verb roots in English.” In The Syntax of Aspect, ed. by Nomi Erteschik-Shir, and Tova Rapoport, 42–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harley, Heidi
2008 “The bipartite structure of verbs cross-linguistically, or, Why Mary can't exhibit John her paintings.” In Conferências do V Congresso Internacional da Associação Brasileira de Lingüística, ed. by Thaïs Cristófaro Silva, and Heliana Mello, 45–84. Belo Horizonte, Brazil: ABRALIN and FALE/UFMG.
Higginbotham, James
2000Accomplishments. Ms. University of Oxford.
Iacobini, Claudio, and Francesca Masini
2006 “The emergence of verb-particle constructions in Italian: locative and actional meanings.” Morphology 16 (2): 155–188.
Levin, Beth
1993English verb classes and alternations. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Masini, Francesca
2005 “Multi-Word Expressions between Syntax and the Lexicon: The Case of Italian Verb-Particle Constructions.” SKY Journal of Linguistics 18: 145–173.
Mateu, Jaume, and Gemma Rigau
2010 “Verb-particle constructions in Romance: a lexical-syntactic account”. Probus 22 (2): 241–269.
Mateu, Jaume
2002Argument Structure. Relational Construal at the Syntax- Semantics Interface. PhD dissertation, UAB.
1992 “Secondary resultative predicates in Italian”. Journal of Linguistics 28: 53–90.
Ramchand, Gillian
2008Verb meaning and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka, and Beth Levin
2005 “Change of State Verbs: Implications for Theories of Argument Projection”, in The Syntax of Aspect, ed. by Nomi Erteschik-Shir, and Tova Rapoport, 274–286. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka, and Beth Levin
2010 “Reflections on Manner/Result Complementarity'”, in Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure, ed. by Edit Doron, Malka Rappaport Hovav, and Ivy Sichel, 21–38. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Snyder, William
1995Language acquisition and language variation: The role of morphology. MIT dissertation, Cambridge, MA.
Snyder, William
2001 “On the nature of syntactic variation: Evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation.” Language 77: 324–342
Talmy, Leonard
1975 “Semantics and Syntax of Motion”. In Syntax and Semantics 4: 181–238.
Talmy, Leonard
1985 “Force Dynamics in language and thought”. Papers from
the Regional Meetings
, Chicago Linguistic Society 21: 293–337.
Tenny, Carol
1992 “The aspectual interface hypothesis.” In Lexical matters, ed. by Ivan A. Sag and Anna Szabolsci, 1–27. Stanford: Stanford University.
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Alexiadou, Artemis
2020. The Complexity of Greek Verbal Morphology. In Complex Words, ► pp. 192 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.