Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 28, Lisbon
Edited by Ernestina Carrilho, Alexandra Fiéis, Maria Lobo and Sandra Pereira
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10] 2016
► pp. 211–232

EPP and ECP revisited

The role of labeling

 | University of Geneva, University of Siena
In the GB framework, EPP and ECP are stated as two independent principles, but they both attribute a special status to the subject position of clauses: subjects are obligatory, and they are not possible extraction sites (unless special conditions are met). This common core suggests the possibility of establishing a closer link between the two properties (Chomsky 2015, Rizzi 2015b). In this paper I would like to revisit EPP and ECP in terms of certain cartographic assumptions on clause structure, the notion of criterial freezing, and the possibility of deriving the freezing effects from labeling.
Keywords: cartography, criteria, ECP, EPP, freezing effects, labeling, subjects, syntax
Published online: 8 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.10.11riz
References (43)
References
Belletti, Adriana. 1990. Generalized Verb Movement. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Inversion as focalization”. In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, ed. by Aafke Hulk and Jean-Yves Pollock, 60–90. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Aspects of the Low IP Area”. In The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2, ed. by Luigi Rizzi, 16–51. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. Structures and Strategies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Belletti Adriana, Elisa Bennati and Antonella Sorace. 2007. “Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: evidence from near native Italian”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25 (4): 657–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berthélot, Frédérique. 2016. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Geneva.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina and Cristiano Chesi. 2012. “Subject Islands and the Subject Criterion”. in Enjoy Linguistics! Papers offered to Luigi Rizzi on the occasion of his 60th birthday , Electronic Festschrift, [URL].
Bošković, Želiko. 2008. “On the Operator Freezing Effects”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 455–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 1976. “On the form and functioning of transformations”. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 3–40.Google Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea. 1986. “Some Properties of the Italian Pronominal System: An Analysis Based on the Notion of Thema as Subject of Predication”. In Tema-Rema in Italiano, ed. by H. Stammerjohann, 25–36. Tuebingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2004. “Towards a cartography of subject positions”. In The structure of CP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, Vol. 2, ed. by Luigi Rizzi, 115–165. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Minimalist inquiries”. In Step by step: Minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by R. Martin, D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Problems of Projection”. In Lingua, 130, Special Issue “Core Ideas and Results in Syntax”: 33–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Problems of Projection: Extensions”. In Structures, strategies and beyond – Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, ed. by E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann and S. Matteini, 3–16. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik. 1977. “Filters and Control”. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425–504.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Inflectional Heads. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Samuel D., Hisatsugu Kitahara and T. Daniel Seely. 2015. “What do we wonder is not syntactic?” In Explorations in Maximizing Syntactic Minimization, Chapter 11, ed. by Samuel D. Epstein, Hisatsuguru Kitahara and T. Daniel Seely, 222–240. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Guenther, and Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.). 1990. “Introduction.” In Scrambling and Barriers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koopman, Hilda and Dominique Sportiche. 1982. “Variables and the Bijection Principle”. The Linguistic Review 2: 139–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, Howard and Mamoru Saito. 1992. Move Alpha, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita and Leonardo M. Savoia. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanci. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso,Google Scholar
Moro, Andrea. 2000. Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nicolis, Marco. 2005 On pro Drop, Doctoral dissertation, University of Siena.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David. 1970. Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The Higher Functional Field. Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. “Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro ”. Linguistic Inquiry, 17.3: 501–557.Google Scholar
. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery”. In Elements of Grammar, ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281–337, Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “Locality and Left Periphery”. In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, ed. by Adriana Belletti, 223–251. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. “On the Form of Chains: Criterial Positions and ECP Effects”. In On Wh Movement, ed. by L. Cheng, N. Corver, 97–133. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2011. “On Some Properties of Criterial Freezing”. In The Complementizer Phrase, ed. by E.P. Panagiotidis, 17–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2015a. “Cartography, Criteria, and Labeling”. In Beyond Functional Sequence- The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol 10, ed. by U. Shlonsky, 314–338. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015b. “Notes on Labeling and Subject Positions”. In Structures, strategies and beyond – Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, ed. by E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann and S. Matteini, 17–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “Labeling, maximality, and the head – phrase distinction”. The Linguistic Review 33 (1): 103–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi and Ur Shlonsky. 2007. “Strategies of Subject Extraction”. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky's Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics, ed. by H.-M. Gärtner and Uli Sauerland, 115–160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi and Guglielmo Cinque. 2016. “Functional categories and syntactic theory”, Annual Review of Linguistics, 2: 139–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi and Giuliano Bocci. 2015. “The left periphery of the clause – Primarily illustrated for Italian”, to appear in the Blackwell Companion to Syntax, II edition.Google Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur. 2014. “Subject positions, subject extraction, EPP and the Subject Criterion”. In Locality, ed. by E. Aboh, M.T. Guasti, I. Roberts, 58–85. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sobin, Nicolas. 2002. “The Comp-trace effect, the adverb effect and minimal CP”. Journal of Linguistics 38, 527–560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stowell, Timothy. 1981. Origins of Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Felser, Claudia & Janna-Deborah Drummer
2022. Binding Out of Relative Clauses in Native and Non-native Sentence Comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 51:4 ► pp. 763 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Romance Interrogative Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 266], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.