Intervention or phasal locality?
Two ways of being local in French causative constructions
Alain Rouveret | Université Paris-Diderot, Laboratoire de linguistique formelle
The Minimalist Program claims that only two notions of locality are necessary: phasal locality and intervention locality (in the form of the Minimal Link Condition). This paper asks whether the unification of the two is possible or desirable. An argument against unification would consist in showing that a process A obeys one locality condition and doesn’t obey the other and that another process B does exactly the reverse. Two phenomena are considered, which fit this description – respectively interpretation (R-I) and clitic placement (CL-PL). Their contrasting behavior in the French faire-construction indicates that each one obeys a locality condition that the other does not: CL-PL obeys phasal locality, R-I some form of minimality. The theoretical implications of these findings for the theory of locality and the architecture of grammar are examined in the conclusion.
References
Abels, Klaus
2003 Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding, Ph.D., University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Boneh, Nora and Léa Nash
2011 “
High and higher Applicatives. The case of French non-core datives.” In
WCCFL 28, ed. by
Mary V Byram Washburn,
et al.: 60–68.
Bošković, Zeljko
2007 “
Agree, phases and intervention effects.”
Linguistic Analysis 33: 54–96.
Brüning, Benjamin
2001 “
QR obeys Superiority: Frozen scope and ACD.”
Linguistic Inquiry 32: 233–273.
Burzio, Luigi
1986 Italian syntax. A government-binding approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Cecchetto, Carlo
2004 “
Explaining the locality conditions of QR. Consequences for the Theory of Phases.”
Natural Language Semantics 12: 345–397.
Cecchetto, Carlo and Caterina Donati
2015 On Labelling. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chaves, Rui
2012 “
Conjunction, cumulation and respectively readings.”
Journal of Linguistics 48: 297–344.
Chomsky, Noam
1973 “
Conditions on transformations.” In
A Festschrift for Morris Halle, ed. by
S. Anderson and
P. Kiparsky, 232–286. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Chomsky, Noam
1986 Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.
Chomsky, Noam
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam
2000 “
Minimalist inquiries: the framework.” In
Step by Step, ed. by
R. Martin,
D. Michaels and
J. Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam
2001 “
Derivation by phase.” In
Ken Hale: a Life in Language, ed. by
M. Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam
2008 “
On phases.” In
Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, ed. by
R. Freidin,
C. Otero and
M.-L. Zubizarreta, 133–166. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam
2013 “
Problems of projection”.
Lingua 130: 33–49.
Collins, Chris
2005 “
A smuggling approach to the passive in English.”
Syntax 8: 81–120.
Ferguson, Scott
1996 A feature-relativized shortest move requirement. Ph.D. Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
Folli, Raffaella and Heidi Harley
2007 “
Causation, obligation and argument structure: On the nature of little v*.”
Linguistic Inquiry 38: 197–238.
Fox, Danny and David Pesetsky
2004 “
Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure.”
Theoretical Linguistics 31: 1–46.
Gawron, Jean Mark and Andrew Keller
2004 “
The semantics of respective readings. Conjunction and filler-gap dependencies.”
Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 169–207.
Groat, Erich
2013 “
Is Movement a part of Narrow Syntax?” Unpublished paper, Goethe-University, Frankfurt.
Guasti, Maria Teresa
1996 “
Semantic restrictions in Romance causatives and the incorporation approach.”
Linguistic Inquiry 27: 294–313.
Homer, Vincent, Tomoko Ishizuka and Dominique Sportiche
2009 “
The locality of clitic placement and the analysis of French causatives.” Talk given at
Glow in Asia, Hyderabad
.
Hu, Victor Xiaoshi
2014 “
A phasal analysis of cliticization in French causative constructions.” Unpublished paper, UFRL, Université Paris-Diderot.
Hu, Victor Xiaoshi
2015 “
Diagnosing the internal structure of French causative constructions.” Unpublished paper, UFRL, Université Paris-Diderot.
Ippolito, Michela
2000 “
Remarks on the argument structure of Romance causatives.” Unpublished paper, MIT.
Kayne, Richard
1975 French syntax. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
Kayne, Richard
2004 “
Prepositions as probes.” In
Structures and Beyond, ed. by
A. Belletti, 192–212. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Larson, Richard
1988 “
On the double object construction.”
Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.
McCawley, James
1968 “
The role of semantics in a grammar.” In
Universals of Linguistic Theory, ed. by
E. Bach and
R.T. Harms, 124–169. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
McCawley, James
1998 The Syntactic Phenomena of English. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Nash, Léa and Alain Rouveret
2002 “
Cliticization as unselective Attract.”
Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1: 157–199.
Nevins, Andrew
2011 “
Multiple agree with clitics: person complementarity vs. omnivorous number.”
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 939–971.
Pylkkänen, Liina
2008 Introducing Arguments. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Rizzi, Luigi
1990 Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Rizzi, Luigi
2013, “
Locality.”
Lingua 130: 169–186.
Roberts, Ian
2010 Agreement and Head Movement. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Rouveret, Alain
2014 “
Two ways of being local: the case of French causative constructions.” In
O Universal e o Particular. Uma vida a comparar. Homenagem a Maria Francisca Xavier, ed. by
A. Fiéis,
M. Lobo and
A. Madeira, 277–298. Lisboa: Edições Colibri.
Rouveret, Alain and Jean-Roger Vergnaud
1980 “
Specifying reference to the subject: French causatives and conditions on representations”.
Linguistic Inquiry 11: 97–202.
Scha, Remko
1981 “
Distributive, collective and cumulative quantification.” In
Formal Methods in the Study of Language, ed. by
J. Groenendijk,
T. Janssen and
M. Stokhof, 483–512. Amsterdam.
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa
1987 Levels of Representations. Dordrecht: Foris.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Hu, Xiaoshi
2018.
Explorer la structure interne des constructions causatives du français.
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 63:1
► pp. 70 ff.
Hu, Xiaoshi
2023.
Defectivity Matters: Cliticization in French Causatives Revisited.
Linguistic Inquiry 54:4
► pp. 759 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.