Article published in:
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 28, Lisbon
Edited by Ernestina Carrilho, Alexandra Fiéis, Maria Lobo and Sandra Pereira
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10] 2016
► pp. 233258
References

References

Abels, Klaus
2003Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding, Ph.D., University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Boneh, Nora and Léa Nash
2011 “High and higher Applicatives. The case of French non-core datives.” In WCCFL 28, ed. by Mary V Byram Washburn, et al.: 60–68.Google Scholar
Bošković, Zeljko
2007 “Agree, phases and intervention effects.” Linguistic Analysis 33: 54–96.Google Scholar
Brüning, Benjamin
2001 “QR obeys Superiority: Frozen scope and ACD.” Linguistic Inquiry 32: 233–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burzio, Luigi
1986Italian syntax. A government-binding approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo
2004 “Explaining the locality conditions of QR. Consequences for the Theory of Phases.” Natural Language Semantics 12: 345–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo and Caterina Donati
2015On Labelling. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chaves, Rui
2012 “Conjunction, cumulation and respectively readings.” Journal of Linguistics 48: 297–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1973 “Conditions on transformations.” In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, ed. by S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky, 232–286. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1986Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000 “Minimalist inquiries: the framework.” In Step by Step, ed. by R. Martin, D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 “Derivation by phase.” In Ken Hale: a Life in Language, ed. by M. Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008 “On phases.” In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, ed. by R. Freidin, C. Otero and M.-L. Zubizarreta, 133–166. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Problems of projection”. Lingua 130: 33–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Chris
2005 “A smuggling approach to the passive in English.” Syntax 8: 81–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Costantini, Francesco
2010 “On the argument structure of the causative construction: evidence from scope interactions.” In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2010, ed. by I. Franco, S. Lusini and A. Saab, 203–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Scott
1996A feature-relativized shortest move requirement. Ph.D. Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Folli, Raffaella and Heidi Harley
2007 “Causation, obligation and argument structure: On the nature of little v*.” Linguistic Inquiry 38: 197–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Danny and David Pesetsky
2004 “Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure.” Theoretical Linguistics 31: 1–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gawron, Jean Mark and Andrew Keller
2004 “The semantics of respective readings. Conjunction and filler-gap dependencies.” Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 169–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Groat, Erich
2013 “Is Movement a part of Narrow Syntax?” Unpublished paper, Goethe-University, Frankfurt.
Guasti, Maria Teresa
1996 “Semantic restrictions in Romance causatives and the incorporation approach.” Linguistic Inquiry 27: 294–313.Google Scholar
Homer, Vincent, Tomoko Ishizuka and Dominique Sportiche
2009 “The locality of clitic placement and the analysis of French causatives.” Talk given at Glow in Asia, Hyderabad .
Hu, Victor Xiaoshi
2014 “A phasal analysis of cliticization in French causative constructions.” Unpublished paper, UFRL, Université Paris-Diderot.
2015 “Diagnosing the internal structure of French causative constructions.” Unpublished paper, UFRL, Université Paris-Diderot.
Ippolito, Michela
2000 “Remarks on the argument structure of Romance causatives.” Unpublished paper, MIT.
Kayne, Richard
1975French syntax. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004 “Prepositions as probes.” In Structures and Beyond, ed. by A. Belletti, 192–212. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard
1988 “On the double object construction.” Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.Google Scholar
McCawley, James
1968 “The role of semantics in a grammar.” In Universals of Linguistic Theory, ed. by E. Bach and R.T. Harms, 124–169. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.Google Scholar
1998The Syntactic Phenomena of English. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon
2011Constraints on Displacement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nash, Léa and Alain Rouveret
2002 “Cliticization as unselective Attract.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1: 157–199.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew
2011 “Multiple agree with clitics: person complementarity vs. omnivorous number.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 939–971. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina
2008Introducing Arguments. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1990Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2013, “Locality.” Lingua 130: 169–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2010Agreement and Head Movement. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rouveret, Alain
2014 “Two ways of being local: the case of French causative constructions.” In O Universal e o Particular. Uma vida a comparar. Homenagem a Maria Francisca Xavier, ed. by A. Fiéis, M. Lobo and A. Madeira, 277–298. Lisboa: Edições Colibri.Google Scholar
Rouveret, Alain and Jean-Roger Vergnaud
1980 “Specifying reference to the subject: French causatives and conditions on representations”. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 97–202.Google Scholar
Scha, Remko
1981 “Distributive, collective and cumulative quantification.” In Formal Methods in the Study of Language, ed. by J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen and M. Stokhof, 483–512. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa
1987Levels of Representations. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Hu, Xiaoshi
2018. Explorer la structure interne des constructions causatives du français. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 63:1  pp. 70 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.