Chapter 1
Embedding verbs and subjunctive mood
The emotive factor
I give a uniform account of French mood from a semantic and nano-syntactic perspective by revising the criteria for the distribution of indicative vs. subjunctive mood. I claim that the subjunctive is selected by the semantic property of emotivity encoded in the main clause verb. I develop a definition and a syntactic representation of emotive vs. non-emotive verbs and a set of diagnostics for the two classes. I also reexamine the notion of veridicality and show that it is not the determining factor in the choice of mood (contra Giannakidou 1998, 2009, a.o.).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical background
- 2.1Nanosyntax (Starke 2009, 2011; Caha 2009)
- 2.2Veridicality, non-veridicality, and relative veridicality
-
3.Personal constructions
- 3.1Decomposing the meaning(s) of verbs
- 3.2
Dowty (1991)
- 3.3Emotive vs. non-emotive sentience
- 3.4Verbs optionally taking indicative or subjunctive CPs: Emotive vs. non-emotive readings
- 4.Impersonal constructions
- 5.The proposal
- 5.1The structures of personal constructions
- 5.2The structures of impersonal constructions
- 6.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References
References
Baunaz, Lena
2015 On the various sizes of complementizers.
Probus 27 (2): 193–236.
Baunaz, Lena
2016 Deconstructing complementizers in Serbo-Croatian, Modern Greek and Bulgarian.
Proceedings of NELS 46 (1): 69–77.
Baunaz, Lena, and Genoveva Puskás
2014 “
The Selection of French Mood.” In
Selected Papers from the 41th LSRL, Ottawa, May 2011, ed.
Eric Mathieu et
Marie-Hélène Côté, 233–253. John Benjamins.
Baunaz, Lena, and Eric Lander
Under review. Nanosyntax: the basics. Ms. Universiteit Gent.
Becker, Martin G.
2010 “
Principles of mood change in evaluative contexts: the case of French.” In
Modality and mood in Romance, ed. by
Martin G. Becker and
Eva-Maria Remberger, 209–234. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Caha, Pavel
2009 The nanosyntax of case. PhD, University of Tromsø
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: OUP.
Costantini, Francesco
2009 Interface Perspectives on Clausal Complementation. The Case of Subjunctive Obviation. Venezia, Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina.
Dowty, David
1991 “
Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection”,
Language 67: 547–619.
Egré, Paul
2008 Question-Embedding and Factivity.
Grazer Philosophische Studien 77 (1): 85–125.
Ernst, Thomas
2002 The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: CUP.
Giannakidou, Anastasia
2009 The dependency of the subjunctive revisited: temporal semantics and polarity.
Lingua, special issue on
Mood, 883–1908.
Kelepouris, Stavros
2012 The syntax and semantics of subject-oriented adverbs.
A proposal for a new classification. Ms. University of Ghent.
Kiparsky, Paul, and Carol Kiparsky
1971 “
Fact.” In
Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology, ed. by
Danny D. Steinberg and
Leon A. Jakobovits, 345–369. CUP.
Kratzer, Angelika
2013 Modality and the semantics of embedding, slides from presentation at the Amsterdam Colloquium, December 2013.
Léger, Catherine
2006 La complémentation de type phrastique des adjectifs en français. PhD, Université du Québec à Montréal.
Moulton, Keir
2009 Natural Selection and the Syntax of Clausal Complementation, Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Puskás, Genoveva
2013 Subjunctives – a Family Business. Talk given at the Séminaire de Recherche, University of Geneva, 16.09.2013.
Quer, Josep
2009 Twists of mood: The distribution and interpretation of indicative and subjunctive.
Lingua 119 (12): 1779–1787.
Ramchand, Gillian
2008a Verb Meaning and the Lexicon. CUP.
Ramchand, Gillian
2008b Lexical Items in Complex Predications: Selection as Underassociation.
Nordlyd, Tromsø Working Papers in Linguistics.
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 “
The fine structure of the left periphery.” In
Elements of grammar: A Handbook of Generative Syntax, ed. by
Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rosch, Eleanor H.
1973 Natural categories, in
Cognitive Psychology 4: 328–50.
Ruwet, Nicolas
1984
Je veux partir / *Je veux que je parte: on the Distribution of Finite Complements and Infinitival Complements in French. In
Cahiers de Grammaire 7: 75–138.
Socanac, Tomislav
2011 Subjunctive in Serbian/Croatian.
GG@G 7: 49–70.
Starke, Michal
2009 “
Nanosyntax. A short primer to a new approach to language.” In
Nordlyd 36.1, special issue on Nanosyntax, ed. by
Peter Svenonius,
Gillian Ramchand,
Michal Starke, and
Knut Tarald Taraldsen, 1–6. CASTL, Tromsø.
Starke, Michal
2011 Towards an elegant solution to language variation: Variation reduces to the seize of lexically stored trees. Ms. Barcelona, Spain.
Tóth, Enikő
2008 Mood Choice in Complement Clauses. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Villalta, Elisabeth
2006 Context dependence in the interpretation of questions and subjunctives. PhD dissertation, Universität Tübingen
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Dudley, Amber & Roumyana Slabakova
2021.
L2 Knowledge of the Obligatory French Subjunctive: Offline Measures and Eye Tracking Compared.
Languages 6:1
► pp. 31 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.