Chapter published in:
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 29, Nijmegen
Edited by Janine Berns, Haike Jacobs and Dominique Nouveau
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13] 2018
► pp. 520


Alcaraz, Alejo
2016 “The Obviation Agreement Effect”. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 28, ed. by Ernestina Carilho, Alexandra Fiéis, Maria Lobo and Sandra Pereira, 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark
1988Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Béjar, Susana
2003Phi-syntax: A Theory of Agreement. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Bonet, M. Eulàlia
1991Morphology after Syntax: Pronominal Clitics in Romance. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio
1992 “Anáforas distributivas: La gramática de sendos”. Miscellanea antverpiensia: Homenaje al vigesimo aniversario del Instituto de Estudios Hispanicos de la Universidad de Amberes: 59–92.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1965Aspects of Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1995 “Categories and Transformations”. The Minimalist Program, 219–394.Google Scholar
2000 “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework”. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels and Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Demonte, Violeta
1995 “Dative Alternation in Spanish”. International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics 7 (1): 5–30.Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel
1995 “Binding, Expletives and Levels”. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 347–354.Google Scholar
Embick, David and Rolf Noyer
2001 “Movement Operations after Syntax”. Linguistic Inquiry 32 (4): 555–595. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “Distributed Morphology and the Syntax/Morphology Interface”. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, ed. by Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss, 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz
1993 “Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection”, In The View from Building 20, ed. by Ken Hale and Samuel J. Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fernández Soriano, Olga
1989 “Strong Pronouns in Null-subject Languages and the Avoid Pronoun Principle”. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 228–239.Google Scholar
Fiengo, Robert, and Robert May
1994Indices and Identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo
1982Topics in Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard
1999 “On Feature Strength: Three Minimalist Approaches to Overt Movement”. Linguistic Inquiry 30 (2): 197–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manzini, Maria Rita, and Leonardo Maria Savoia
2005I dialetti italiani e romanci: morfosintassi generativa (Vol. 1). Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew
2007 “The Representation of Third-person and its Consequences for Person-case Effects”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 273–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Haplological Dissimilation at Distinct Stages of Exponence”. In The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence, ed. by Jochen Trommer, 84–116. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noyer, R.
2001 “Clitic Sequences in Nunggubuyu and PF Convergence”. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 19 (4): 751–826. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco
2000The Clausal Structure of Spanish: a Comparative Perspective. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Ormazabal, Javier, and Juan Romero
2013 “Object Clitics, Agreement and Dialectal Variation”. International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics 25 (2): 301–344.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard K.
1988 “On the Double Object Construction”. Linguistic Inquiry 19 (3): 335–391.Google Scholar
Panagiotidis, Phoevos, and Stavroula Tsiplakou
2006 “An A-binding Asymmetry in Null Subject Languages and its Significance for Universal Grammar”. Linguistic Inquiry 37 (1): 167–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David M.
1968Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Preminger, Omer
2014Agreement and its Failures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Breaking Agreements: Distinguishing Agreement and Clitic Doubling by their Failures”. Linguistic Inquiry 40 (4): 619–666. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torrego, Esther
1995 “From Argumental to Non-argumental Pronouns: Spanish doubled reflexives”. Probus 7 (2): 221–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar