Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 29, Nijmegen
Edited by Janine Berns, Haike Jacobs and Dominique Nouveau
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13] 2018
► pp. 55–74

On ben in Trentino regional Italian

| Sapienza University of Rome | University of Cambridge
The aim of the present article is to discuss the syntactic distribution and semantic/pragmatic interpretation of the discourse particle ben (lit. ‘well’) as used in the Trentino regional variety of Italian. Regarding its distribution, the results of our investigation with native speakers show that ben is admitted in any of the tested TAM contexts (save for non-root embedded clauses) and always sits between the lexical/auxiliary/restructuring verb and the non-finite form. As for its interpretation, it is shown that ben is used to negate an implicit or explicit negative presupposition, i.e. it is primarily connected with negation. These syntactic and interpretative properties are captured by claiming that ben sits in NegPresuppositionalP, where it is licensed by the (c)overt operator no located in ForceP.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The data
  • 3.Towards an analysis for Trentino ben
    • 3.1Previous works on Italian ben
    • 3.2Propositional vs expressive level
    • 3.3The semantic contribution
    • 3.4On anaphoricity
    • 3.5On emphatic polarity
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.13.05cog
References (30)
References
Baardewyk-Resseguier, Jacqueline van. 1991. “Les particules de modalité wel et bien. Une approche contrastive néerlandais-français”. Cahiers de lexicologie 59: 39–49.Google Scholar
Batllori, Montserrat, and Maria-Lluïsa Hernanz. 2013. “Emphatic Polarity from Latin to Romance”. Lingua 128: 9–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 1990. Generalised Verb Movement. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier.Google Scholar
. 1994. “Verb Positions: Evidence from Italian”. In Verb Movement, ed. by David Lightfoot and Norbert Hornstein, 19–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2011. “German and Italian Modal Particles and Clause Structure”. Linguistic Review 28: 493–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “What do you do if you do not have Modal Particles?” In Charting the landscape of linguistics. On the scope of Josef Bayer’s Work, ed. by Ellen Brandner, Anna Czypionka, Constantin Freitag and Andreas Trotzke, 16–21. Konstanz: University of Konstanz.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1991. “Mica: Note di sintassi e pragmatica”. In Teoria linguistica e sintassi italiana, ed. by Guglielmo Cinque, 311–323. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco. 2008. “Modal Particles in Italian”. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 91–129.Google Scholar
Cognola, Federica, and Norma Schifano. 2015. “Italian ben: a Case Study on Romance Discourse Particles”. Paper presented at Romance Linguistics Seminars, 20 November 2015, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
. 2018. “On the Marking of Negative Presupposition in Regional Varieties of Italian”. In Romance Syntax. Comparative and Diachronic Perspectives, ed. by Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Rodica Zafiu, Adina Dragomirescu, Alexandru Nicolae, Irina Nicula Paraschiv, 435–455. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
. forthcoming. “From macro to nano: a Parametric Hierarchy Approach to the diatopic and diachronic variation of Italian ben”. In Clausal Architecture and Its Consequences: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives (Vol 1), ed. by , Theresa Biberauer, Jamie Douglas, András Bárány and Sten Vikner.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio. 2010. “On the Syntactic Status of Sentential Adverbs and Modal Particles”. Language Typology and Universals (STUF) 63 (4): 345–357.Google Scholar
Fintel, Kai von. 2008. “What is Presupposition Accommodation, Again?” Philosophical Perspectives 22 (1): 137–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2006. “Conditionals, Factives and the Left Periphery”. Lingua 116: 1651–1669. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernanz, Maria-Lluïsa. 2010. “Assertive bien in Spanish and the Left Periphery”. In Mapping the Left Periphery, ed. by Paola Benincà and Nicola Munaro, 19–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2001. “The Syntax of Yes and No in Finnish”. Studia Linguistica 55: 141–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laka, Itziar. 1990. Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2010. “The Clausal Domain: CP Structure and the Left Periphery”. In Syntactic Variation and the Dialects of Italy, ed. by Roberta D’Alessandro, Adam Ledgeway and Ian Roberts, 38–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lonzi, Lidia. 1991. “Il sintagma avverbiale”. In Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione vol. 2, ed. by Lorenzo Renzi and Giampaolo Salvi, 341–412. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Munaro, Nicola, and Cecilia Poletto. 2004. “Sentential Particles and Clause Typing in Veneto Dialects”. ZAS Papers in Linguistics (ZASPiL) 35: 375–397.Google Scholar
Padovan, Andrea, and Nicoletta Penello. 2014. “On the Element ben in Trentino Dialects”. Poster presented at CIDSM 2014, Universities of Padua and Venice.Google Scholar
Pecoraro, Walter, and Chiara Pisacane. 1984. L’avverbio. Zanichelli: Bologna.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 2008. “The Syntax of Focus Negation”. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 179–202.Google Scholar
Vinet, Marie-Theiese. 1996. “On Certain Adverbs of Quantification in Quebec French”. Probus 8: 207–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waltereit, Richard, and Ulrich Detges. 2007. “Different Functions, Different Histories. Modal Particles and Discourse Markers from a Diachronic Point of View”. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6: 61–80.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weydt, Harald. 1969. Abtönungspartikel: Die deutschen Modalwörter und ihre französischen Entsprechungen. Bad Homburg: Gehlen.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1997. Negation and Clausal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte. 2004. “Discourse Particles in the Left Periphery”. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 35: 543–566.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Discourse Particles”. In Semantics ( = Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft HSK (33.2)), ed. by Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn and Paul Portner, 2011–2038. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Cognola, Federica, Manuela Caterina Moroni & Ermenegildo Bidese
2022. Chapter 8. A comparative study of German auch and Italian anche. In Particles in German, English, and Beyond [Studies in Language Companion Series, 224], ► pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Cognola, Federica & Silvio Cruschina
2021. Between Time and Discourse A Syntactic Analysis of Italianpoi. Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie occidentale :55 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.