Chapter published in:
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 29, Nijmegen
Edited by Janine Berns, Haike Jacobs and Dominique Nouveau
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13] 2018
► pp. 315336
References

References

Adams, Marianne
1987a “Embedded Pro.” In Proceedings of NELS 16, ed. by James Blevins and Juli Carter, 1:1–22. Massachusetts: GSLA.Google Scholar
1987b “From Old French to the Theory of Pro-Drop”. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 5 (1): 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988Les effets V2 en ancien et en moyen français. Revue québécoise de linguistique théorique et appliqué 7. 13–39.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2008Structures and Strategies. New York: London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola
1995Complement clitics in medieval Romance: The Tobler-Mussafia law. In Ian Roberts & Adrian Battye (eds.), Clause structure and language change., 325–344. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2001 “On the Position of Topic and Focus in the Left Periphery”. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, edited by Guglielmo Cinque and Giampaolo Salvi, 39–64. London/New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2004 “The Left Periphery of Medieval Romance”. Studi Linguistici E Filologici Online 2 (2): 243–297.Google Scholar
2006 “A Detailed Map of the Left Periphery of Medieval Romance”. In Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture, ed. by Raffaella Zanuttini, 53–86. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
2013 “Caratteristiche Del V2 Romanzo. Lingue Romanze Antiche, Ladino Dolomitico E Portoghese”. In Introduzione Alla Linguistica Del Mòcheno, edited by Ermenegildo Bidese and Federica Cognola, 65–84. Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola, andNicola Munaro
eds. 2010Mapping the Left Periphery. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 5. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola, and Cecilia Poletto
2004 “Topic, Focus, and V2”. In The Structure of CP and IP, ed. by Luigi Rizzi, 52–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Besten, Hans den
1977 “On the Interaction of Root Transfomrations and Lexical Deletive Rules”. In On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania, ed. byWerner Abraham, 47–61. Amsterdam/Philadelphia:Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna, and Ian Roberts
2002 “Clause Structure and X-Second”. In Functional Structure in DP and IP, vol. 1, ed. by Guglielmo Cinque, 123–166. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
2001 “Restructuring’ and the Order of Aspectual and Root Modal Heads”. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, ed. by Guglielmo Cinque and Giampaolo Salvi, 137–156. Oxford: New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio
2006 “Information Focus in Sicilian and the Left Periphery.” In Phases of Interpretation, ed. by Mara Frascarelli, 363–385. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Focalization and Word Order in Old Italo-Romance”. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10: 95–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Bryan
2015 “Discourse Functions of Subject Left Dislocation in Old Occitan”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16 (2): 159–186. doi:Crossref.Google Scholar
2016 “Preverbal Subjects, Information Structure and Object Clitic Position in Old Occitan”. Journal of Linguistics 52 (01): 37–69. doi:Crossref.Google Scholar
Ferraresi, Gisella, and Maria Goldbach
2002 “V2 Syntax and Topicalization in Old French”. Linguistiche Berichte 189: 2–25.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne
1991 “Discourse Pragmatics and the Grammar of Old French: A Functional Reinterpretation of ‘si’ and the Personal Pronouns”. Romance Philology 44: 251–283.Google Scholar
Fontana, Josep
1993Phrase structure and the syntax of clitics in the history of Spanish. University of Pennsylvania Doctoral Dissertation.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara, and Roland Hinterhölzl
2007 “Types of Topics in German and Italian”. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form, ed. by Susanne Winkler and Kerstin Schwabe, 87–116. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2000 “Inversion, Non-Adjacent Inversion and Adjuncts in CP”. Transactions of the Philological Society 98 (1): 121–160. doi:Crossref.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane, and Ciro Greco
2016 “ V > 2”. presented at the Rethinking Verb Second Workshop, St John’s College, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hamlin, Frank R., Peter T. Ricketts & John Hathaway
1967Introduction à l’étude de l’ancien provençal. Geneva: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline
2006 “Embedded Root Phenomena”. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, ed. by Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 174–209. Blackwell Publishing. http://​onlinelibrary​.wiley​.com​/doi​/10​.1002​/9780470996591​.ch23​/summary. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2005 “Is There a Little Pro? Evidence from Finnish”. Linguistic Inquiry 36 (4): 533–564. doi:Crossref.Google Scholar
2015 “Verb Second”. In Syntax-Theory and Analysis, ed. by Tibor Kiss and Artemis Alexiadou, 242–283. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hulk, Aafke, and Jean-Yves Pollock
2001 “Subject Positions in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar”. In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, 3–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hulk, Aafke, and Ans van Kemenade
1995 “ Verb-Second, Pro-Drop, Functional Projections and Language Change. ” In Clause Structure and Language Change, ed. by Ian Roberts and Adrian Battye, 227–256. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, Frede
1990Old French and Comparative Gallo-Romance Syntax. Tübingen: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Syntaxe de l’ancien occitan. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, Georg A.
2002Verbstellung und Verbstellungswandel in anden Romanischen Sprachen. Max Niemeyer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koster
Jan. 1975 “Dutch as an SOV Language“. Linguistic Analysis 1: 111–136.Google Scholar
Kunert, Hans
2003 “L’ordine degli elementi della frase in occitano antico”. Romanische Forschungen 115: 194–209.Google Scholar
Labelle, Marie
2007 “Clausal Architecture in Early Old French”. Lingua 117 (1): 289–316. doi:Crossref.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form : Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2007 “Old Neapolitan Word Order: Some Initial Observations”. In Histories and Dictionaries of the Languages of Italy, ed. by Anna Laura Lepschy and Arturo Tosi, 121–149. Ravenna: Longo.Google Scholar
2008Satisfying V2 in Early Romance: Merge vs. Move.” Journal of Linguistics 44 (02): 437–470. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lemieux, Monique, and Fernande Dupuis
1995 “The Locus of Verb Movement in Non-Asymmetric Verb-Second Languages: The Case of Middle French”. In Clause Structure and Language Change, ed. by Ian Roberts and Adrian Battye, 80–110. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1995 “Why UG Needs a Learning Theory: Triggering Verb Movement”. In Clause Structure and Language Change, ed. by Adrian Battye and Ian Roberts, 31–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
1985Dire le vrai: L’adverbe « si » en Français Médieval: Essai de linguistique historique. Publications Romanes et Françaises, CLXVIII. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Mathieu, Éric
2006 “Stylistic Fronting in Old French”. Probus 18: 219–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “The Left Periphery in Old French”. In Research in Old French: The State of the Art, ed. by Deborah Arteaga, 327–350. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Oliviéri, Michèle, and Patrick Sauzet
2016 “Southern Gallo-Romance (Occitan)”. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, ed. By Adam Ledgeway and Martin Maiden, 319–349. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paoli, Sandra
2010 “In Focus: An Investigation of Information and Contrastive Constructions”. In Syntactic Variation: The Dialects of Italy, ed. by Roberta D’Alessandro, Adam Ledgeway and Ian Roberts, 277–291. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia
2002 “ The Left-Periphery of V2-Rhaetoromance Dialects: A New View on V2 and V3. ” In Syntactic Microvariation. Meertens Institute Electronic Publications in Linguistics 2 , ed. by Sjef Barbiers, Leonie Cornips and Susanne van der Kleij, 214–242. Amsterdam: Meertens Institute.Google Scholar
2014Word Order in Old Italian. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Priestley, Leanord
1955 “Reprise Constructions in French”. Archivum Linguisticum 7: 1–28.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F.
1981 “Toward a Taxonomy of given-New Information”. In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 223–255. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Reenen, van Pieter, and Lene Schøsler
1992 “Ancien et Moyen Français: SI ‘Thématique’, Analyse Exhaustive d’une Série de Textes”. Vox Romanica 51: 101–127.Google Scholar
Reenen, Pieter van, and Lene Schøsler
2000 “The Pragmatic Functions of the Old French Particles Ainz, Apres, Donc, Lors, Or, Pluis, and Si”. In Textual Parameters in Older Languages, ed. by Susan C. Herring, Pieter van Reenen and Lene Schøsler, 59–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rinke, Esther, and Martin Elsig
2010 “Quantitative Evidence and Diachronic Syntax”. Lingua 120 (11): 2557–2568. doi:Crossref..Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1986 “Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of Pro”. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557.Google Scholar
1997 “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery”. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Grammar, ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281–338. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi, and Ian Roberts
1989 “Complex Inversion in French”. Probus 1: 1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
1993Verbs and diachronic syntax : A comparative history of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
2010 “A Deletion Analysis of Null Subjects”. In Parametric Variation : Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, ed. by Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts and Michelle Sheehan, 58–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2012 “Phases, Head Movement and Second-Position Effects”. In Phases developing the framework, ed. by Ángel J. Gallego, 385–440. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rouveret, Alain
2004 “Les clitiques pronominaux et la périphérie gauche en Ancien Français”. Bulletin de La Société de Linguistique de Paris 99: 181–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rowlett, Paul
2007The Syntax of French. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salvesen, Christine
2011 “Stylistic Fronting and Remnant Movement in Old French”. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2009: Selected Papers from “Going Romance” Nice 2009, ed. by Janine Berns, Haike Jacobs and Tobias Scheer, 323–342. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Topics and the Left Periphery: A Comparison of Old French and Modern Germanic”. In In Search of Universal Grammar: From Old Norse to Zoque, ed. by Terje Lohndal, 131–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salvesen, Christine, and Kristin Bech
2014 “Postverbal Subjects in Old English and Old French”. Oslo Studies in Language 6 (1): 201–228.Google Scholar
Salvesen, Christine & George Walkden
2017Diagnosing embedded V2 in Old English and Old French. In Robert Truswell & Éric Mathieu (eds.), Micro-change and Macro-change in Diachronic Syntax. (Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo
2012 “On the Nature of the V2 System of Medieval Romance”. In The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Vol. 7, Functional Heads, ed. by Laura Brugè, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro and Cecilia Poletto, 103–111. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sitaridou, Ioanna
2005 “A Corpus-Based Study of Null Subjects in Old French and Old Occitan”. In Corpora and Diachronic Linguistics, ed. by Claus D. Putsch, Johannes Kabatek and Wolfgang Raible, 359–374. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
2012 “A Comparative Study of Word Order in Old Romance”. Folia Linguistica 46 (2): 1–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, B. Devan
2014The Role of Information Structure in the Loss of Verb-Second in the History of French. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Indiana, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Vance, Barbara
1988 “L’évolution de pro-Drop en Français Médiéval.” Revue Québécoise de Linguistique Théorique et Appliquée 7: 85–109.Google Scholar
1993 “Verb-First Declaratives Introduced by et and the Position of Pro in Old and Middle French”. Lingua 89 (2–3): 281–314. doi:Crossref.Google Scholar
1995 “On the Decline of Verb Movement to Comp in Old and Middle French”. In Clause Structure and Language Change, ed. by Adrian Battye and Ian Roberts, 173–199. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1997Syntactic Change in Medieval French: Verb-Second and Null Subjects. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vance, Barbara, Bryan Donaldson and B. Devan Steiner
2009 “V2 Loss in Old French and Old Occitan: The Role of Fronted Clauses”. In Romance Linguistics 2009. Selected Papers from the 39th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Tuscon, Arizona, ed. by Sonia Colina, Antxon Olarrea and Ana Maria Carvalho, 301–320. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vanelli, Laura, Lorenzo Renzi and Paola Benincà
1986 “Tipologia Dei Pronomi Soggetto Nelle Lingue Romanze Medievali”. Quaderni Patavini Di Linguistica 5: 49–66.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten
1995Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Westergaard, Marit
2009The Acquisition of word order: Micro-cues, information structure, and economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Kristine Bentzen, Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson and Þorbjörg Hróarsdóttir
2009“On the Distribution and Illocution of V2 in Scandinavian That-Clauses”; Lingua , Twists of Mood: The Distribution and Interpretation of Indicative and Subjunctive, 119 (12): 1914–1938. doi:Crossref.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Sam
2015a “ Microparametric Variation in Old Italo-Romance Syntax: The View from Old Sicilian and Old Sardinian. ” In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2013: Selected Papers from “Going Romance” Amsterdam 2013, ed. by Enoch Oladé Aboh, 51–66. Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 8. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015b “Microvariation in Old Italo-Romance Syntax: The View from Old Sardinian and Old Sicilian”. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 100 (1): 3–36.Google Scholar
2015c “The Nature of Old Spanish Verb Second Reconsidered”. Lingua 164, Part A: 132–155. doi:Crossref.Google Scholar
2015d “Verb-Initial Orders in Old Romance: A Comparative Account”. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique LX (2–3): 148–172.Google Scholar
2016a “A Comparative Perspective on the Evolution of Romance Clausal Structure”. Diachronica 33 (4): 461–502. doi:Crossref.Google Scholar
2016b “On the Left Periphery of V2 Languages”. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa: Selected Papers from the 41st Incontro di Grammatica Generativa (38): 287–310.Google Scholar
To appear. “Redefining the V2 Typology: The View from Medieval Romance and Beyond” ed. by Christine M. Salvesen Linguistic Variation Special Issue: A Micro-Perspective on V2 in Germanic and Romance
Yang, Charles
2000Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa
1998Prosody, Focus and Word Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Donaldson, Bryan
2021. Clause Structure and Illocutionary Force in Medieval Gallo-Romance: Clitic Position in Old Occitan and Early Old French Sentential Coordination. Probus 0:0 Crossref logo
Donaldson, Bryan
2021. Clause Structure and Illocutionary Force in Medieval Gallo-Romance: Clitic Position in Old Occitan and Early Old French Sentential Coordination. Probus 33:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.