Chapter 16
Against control by implicit passive agents
Landau (2010, 2013) and van Urk (2011, 2013) argue that the understood agent of a passive verb is syntactically projected as a weak implicit argument. As such, it participates actively in Agree and predication, the mechanisms they assume are responsible for antecedent determination in control structures. This article examines French data involving control and passivization and proposes an alternative explanation for the facts, one that makes the diametrically opposed assumptions that the implicit agent of a passive verb is syntactically unprojected and that the reference of PRO is determined post-syntactically.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Landau (2000, 2010, 2013), van Urk (2011, 2013) and Reed (2014)
: Some points of agreement and contention
- 3.Further examining the interaction of control with passivization
- 3.1Reconsidering Visser’s effects
- 3.2A syntactic constraint on impersonal passivization
- 3.3On an unexpected parallel between OC PRO and overt bound pronouns
- 3.4On unexpected WIA control in indirect questions
- 4.Against control by weak implicit passive agents
-
Acknowledgements
-
References
References (35)
References
Bowers, John. 2002. “Transitivity.” Linguistic Inquiry 33 (2): 183–224.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brame, Michael. 1978. Base generated syntax. Seattle: Noit Amrofer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bruening, Benjamin. 2013. “
By phrases in passives and nominals.” Syntax 16 (1): 1–41.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Butler, Lindsay. 2009. “Explaining logophoricity, with special reference to Aghem.” Ms., The University of Arizona.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cardinaletti, Anna, and Ur Shlonsky. 2004. “Clitic positions and restructuring in Italian.” Linguistic Inquiry 35 (4): 519–557.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik. 1977. “Filters and control.” Linguistic Inquiry 8 (3): 425–504.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik. 1995. “The theory of principles and parameters.” In The Minimalist Program, Noam Chomsky, 13–127. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evers, Arnold. 1975. “The transformational cycle in Dutch and German.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utrecht.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hagège, Claude. 1974. Les pronoms logophoriques. Bulletin de La Société de Linguistique de Paris 69: 287–310.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. “Movement and control.” Linguistic Inquiry 30 (1): 69–96.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray, and Peter Culicover. 2003. “The semantic basis of control in English.” Language 79 (3): 517–556.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jenkins, Lyle. 1972. “Modality in English syntax.” Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, Idan. 2000. Elements of Control: Structure and meaning in infinitival constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, Idan. 2004. “The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22 (4): 811–877.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, Idan. 2010. “The explicit syntax of implicit arguments.” Linguistic Inquiry 41 (3): 357–388.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, Idan. 2013. Control in generative grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lasersohn, Peter. 1993. “Lexical distributivity and implicit arguments.” In SALT III, ed. by Utpal Lahiri and Adam Wyner, 145–161. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Montague, Richard. 1974. “The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English.” In Formal philosophy, ed. by Richard Thomason, 247–270. New Haven, CT.: Yale University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’Neil, John. 1995. “Out of control.” In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, Volume 1 (NELS 25), ed. by Jill Beckman, 361–371. Amherst: GLSA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the semantics of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Postal, Paul. 1970. “On coreferential complement subject deletion.” Linguistic Inquiry 1 (4): 439–500.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reed, Lisa. 1992. “Remarks on word order in causative constructions.” Linguistic Inquiry 23 (1): 164–172.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reed, Lisa. 2014. Strengthening the PRO hypothesis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reed, Lisa. 2016. “Some notes on devoir, falloir, and the theory of control.” In Romance linguistics 2013. Selected papers from the 43rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), ed. by Christina Tortora, Marcel den Dikken, Ignacio L. Montoya, and Teresa O’Neill, 341–360, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. “Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro
.” Linguistic Inquiry 17 (3): 501–557.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 2001. “On the position ‘Int(errogative)’ in the left periphery of the clause.” In Current studies in Italian syntax, ed. by Guglielmo Cinque and Giampaolo Salvi, 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roeper, Thomas. 1987. “Implicit arguments and the head-complement relation.” Linguistic Inquiry 18 (2): 267–310.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saab, Andrés. 2014. “Syntax or nothing: Some theoretical and empirical remarks on implicit arguments.” Borealis: An international journal of Hispanic linguistics 3 (2): 125–183.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Safir, Kenneth. 1985. Syntactic chains. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Urk, Coppe. 2011. “Visser’s Generalization: A window into the syntax of control.” Ms., MIT.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Urk, Coppe. 2013. “Visser’s Generalization: The syntax of control and passive.” Linguistic Inquiry 44 (1): 168–178.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Visser, Fredericus Theodoricus. 1973. A historical syntax of the English language. Vol. III.2. Leiden: Brill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, Edwin. 1985. “PRO and subject of NP.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3 (3): 297–315.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, Edwin. 1987. “Implicit arguments, the binding theory and control.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5 (2): 151–180.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, Edwin. 1992. “Adjunct control.” In Control and grammar, ed. by Richard Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Utpal Lahiri, and James Higginbotham, 297–322. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
AKKUŞ, FARUK
2021.
Variable embedded agent in Sason Arabic.
Journal of Linguistics 57:2
► pp. 233 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.