Chapter published in:
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 30, Frankfurt
Edited by Ingo Feldhausen, Martin Elsig, Imme Kuchenbrandt and Mareike Neuhaus
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15] 2019
► pp. 113132
References
Barbusse, Henri
1916Le feu. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
CFPP
. Branca-Rosoff, Sonia, Serge Fleury, Florence Lefeuvre, Matthew Pires 2012Discours sur la ville. Présentation du Corpus de Français Parlé Parisien des années 2000 (CFPP2000). http://​cfpp2000​.univ​-paris3​.fr​/CFPP2000​.pdf
CFPQ. Corpus de français parlé au Québec
ESLO. Enquête Socio-Linguistique à Orléans
Fauxbras, César
2011La débâcle. Paris: Allia.Google Scholar
Frantext. Base textuelle Frantext

Studies

Adli, Aria
2006 “French wh-in-situ Questions and Syntactic Optionality: Evidence from Three Data Types.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 25: 163–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baunaz, Lena
2011The grammar of French quantification. Heidelberg: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beyssade, Claire
2007 “La structure de l’information dans les questions : quelques remarques sur la diversité des formes interrogatives en français.” LINX 55: 173–193.Google Scholar
Birner, Bettina
2011 “Semantic and pragmatic contributions to information status”. Acta lingvistica hafniensia 38: 14–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, Tam, and David Willis
2019Pragmatic differentiation of negative markers in the early stages of Jespersen’s cycle in North Germanic. Diachronica 35.4: 451–486.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric
1999 “Decomposing French Questions.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguisitics 6 (1): 69–80.Google Scholar
Boucher, Paul
2010 “Wh-questions in French and English. Mapping Syntax to Information Structure.” In Comparative and contrastive studies of information structure, ed. by Carsten Breul, and Edward Göbbel, 101–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Lisa
1997Wh-in-Situ Phenomena in French. MA dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen, and Johan Rooryck
2000 “Licensing wh-in-situ.” Syntax 3: 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coveney, Aidan
1989Variability in Interrogation and Negation in Spoken French. PhD dissertation, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
1995 “The use of the QU-final interrogative structure in spoken French.” Journal of French Language Studies 5: 143–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Déprez, Viviane, Kristen Syrett, and Shigeto Kawahara
2013 “The interaction of syntax, prosody, and discourse in licensing French wh-in-situ questions.” Lingua 124 (1): 4–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
1996 “Focus, Pragmatic Presupposition, and Activated Propositions.” Journal of Pragmatics 26: 475–523. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Position of Interrogative Phrases in Content Questions.” The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://​wals​.info, Accessed on 2018–07–18.)
Escandell-Vidal, Victoria
2002 “Echo-syntax and metarepresentations.” Lingua 112 (11): 871–900. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, Kelly
2015Sociopragmatic variation in yes/no and wh- interrogatives in hexagonal French. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Fonseca-Greber, Bonnie
2007 “The emergence of emphatic ne in conversational Swiss French.” Journal of French Language Studies 17 (3): 249–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gianollo, Chiara
2016Indefinites
between Latin and Romance. Habilitation thesis, Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt M., and Jacqueline Visconti
2009 “On the diachrony of “reinforced” negation in French and Italian.” In Grammaticalisation and Pragmatics: Facts, Approaches, Theoretical Issues, ed. by Corinne Rossari, Claudia Ricci, and Adriana Spiridon, 137–171. Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamlaoui, Fatima
2011 “On the role of phonology and discourse in Francilian French wh-questions.” Journal of Linguistics 47 (1): 129–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirose, Tomio, and Hiroyuki Nawata
2016 “On the Quotative “Complementizer” -Tte in Japanese.” Semantics-Syntax Interface 3 (1): 1–29.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Georg, and Stefano Quaglia
2015 “In search of wh-in-situ in Romance: An investigation in detective stories.” In Charting the landscape of linguistics, ed. by Ellen Brandner, Anna Czypionka, Constantin Freitag, and Andreas Trotzke, 92–103. Konstanz: Konstanzer Online-Publikations-System.Google Scholar
Kemenade, Ans van
2011 “Secondary negation and Information Structure organization in the History of English.” In The evolution of negation. Beyond the Jespersen Cycle, ed. by Pierre Larrivée, and Richard Ingham, 77–114. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kunstmann, Pierre
1990Le relatif-interrogatif en ancien français. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Larrivée, Pierre
2012 “Positive Polarity, Negation, Activated Propositions.” Linguistics 50 (4): 869–900. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “The syntax of pragmatics: The case of presuppositional negatives.” Syntaxe et Sémantique 15: 115–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “The pragmatics of marked configurations: Negative doubling in French.” Journal of Pragmatics 95: 34–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lefeuvre, Florence
2013Des corpus de référence pour une grammaire du français vernaculaire contemporain. Presentation at the conference Initiative Corpus de référence du français 2, Institut de Linguistique Française, Paris, March 28 2013.
Lin, Don-yi
2016 “Restrictions on wh-in situ in Kavalan and Amis.” Lingua 169: 42–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, Éric
2004 “The mapping of form and interpretation: The case of optional WH-movement in French.” Lingua 114: 1090–1132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Les questions en français: Micro et macro-variation.” In Le français d’ici: Études linguistiques et sociolinguistiques de la variation, ed. by France Martineau, Raymond Mougeon, Terry Nadasdi, and Mireille Tremblay, 37–66. Toronto: GREF.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine
1912 “L’évolution des formes grammaticales.” Scientia 12: 384–400.Google Scholar
Myers, Lindsy Lee
2007WH-interrogatives in spoken French: A corpus-based analysis of their form and function. PhD dissertation, University of Texas Austin.Google Scholar
Obenauer, Hans-Georg
1994Aspect de la syntaxe A-barre – Effets d’intervention et mouvement des quantifieurs. PhD dissertation, Université de Paris VIII.Google Scholar
Oushiro, Livia
2011 “Wh-interrogatives in Brazilian Portuguese: the influence of common ground.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 17 (2): article 17.Google Scholar
Pires, Acrisio and Heather Taylor
2007 “The syntax of Wh-in-situ and common ground.” CLS 43 (2): 201–215.Google Scholar
Rosemeyer, Malte
2019. Actual and apparent change in Brazilian Portuguese wh-interrogatives. Language Variation and Change 31. 1–27.
Schwenter, Scott
2005 “The pragmatics of negation in Brazilian Portuguese.” Lingua 115: 1427–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A. and Mary Johnson
2011Neg Nada constructions in comparative perspective: Brazilian Portuguese and Argitinian Spanish. Presentation at 12th IPRA, July 3–8 2011, University of Manchester. Powerpoint presentation, 24 slides.
Silvennoinen, Olli O.
2017Contrastive negation in English: constructions in a register perspective. Presentation at the Conference The Pragmatics of Negation – Aspects of Communication , Stockholm Universitet, May 2017. Powerpoint, 32 slides, University of Helsinki.
Sobin, Nicholas
2010 “Echo Questions in the Minimalist Program.” Linguistic Inquiry 41 (1): 131–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Squartini, Mario
2017 “Italian non-canonical negations as modal particles: information state, polarity and mirativity.” In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: New perspectives, ed. by Chiara Fedriani, and Andrea Sansó, 203–229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wallage, Phillip
2013 “Functional differentiation and grammatical competition in the English Jespersen Cycle.” Journal of Historical Syntax 2: 1–25.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria-Luisa
2002 “Intervention effects in the French wh-in-situ construction: Syntax or Interpretation?” In A Romance perspective on language knowledge and use: Selected papers from the 31st linguistic symposium on romance languages (LSRL), ed. by R. Nunez-Cedeno, Luis Lopez, and Richard Cameron, 359–380. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Celle, Agnès & Maud Pélissier
2022. Surprise questions in spoken French. Linguistics Vanguard 8:s2  pp. 287 ff. Crossref logo
Garassino, Davide
2022. A contrastive perspective on French and Italian wh-in situ questions. Functions of Language 29:1  pp. 25 ff. Crossref logo
Guryev, Alexander & Pierre Larrivée
2021. Routines discursives comme contextes d’émergence de l’interrogative partielle in situ en diachronie. Langue française N° 212:4  pp. 75 ff. Crossref logo
Larrivée, Pierre
2020. Sémantique de la grammaire, parcours typologiques et changement historique. Semiotica 2020:234  pp. 277 ff. Crossref logo
Nguyen, An D. & Geraldine Legendre
2022. The acquisition of wh-questions: Beyond structural economy and input frequency. Language Acquisition 29:1  pp. 79 ff. Crossref logo
Rossi-Gensane, Nathalie, Luisa Fernanda Acosta Córdoba, Biagio Ursi & Margot Lambert
2021. Les structures interrogatives directes partielles fondées sur où dans les dialogues de romans français du XXesiècle. Journal of French Language Studies 31:2  pp. 169 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 october 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.