Chapter published in:
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 30, Frankfurt
Edited by Ingo Feldhausen, Martin Elsig, Imme Kuchenbrandt and Mareike Neuhaus
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15] 2019
► pp. 136156


Mathieu Avanzi, Anne Lacheret-Dujour, and Bernard Victorri
2008 “ANALOR. A Tool for Semi-Automatic Annotation of French Prosodic Structure”. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2008, Campinas, Brazil. pp. 119–122.Google Scholar
Bartels, Christine
1999The intonation of English statements and questions. New York, NY: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Beyssade, Claire, Elisabeth Delais-Roussarie, Jenny Doetjes, Jean-Marie Marandin, and Annie Rialland
2004 “Prosody and information in French.” In Handbook of French Semantics, ed. by Francis Corblin, and Harriet de Swart, 477–500, Stanford: CSLI publications.Google Scholar
Beyssade, Claire, and Jean-Marie Marandin
2006 “The speech act assignment problem revisited: Disentangling Speaker’s commitment from Speaker’s call on Addressee.” In CSSP’s proceedings. http://​www​.cssp​.cnrs​.fr/
Biezma, Maria, and Kyle Rawlins
2015 “Alternative Questions.” Language and Linguistics Compass 9: 450–468. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul
2001 “Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer.” Glot International 5: 9/10: 341–345.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul, and David Weenink
2017Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.29, retrieved 24 May 2017 from http://​www​.praat​.org/
Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth, and Ingo Feldhausen
2014Variation in Boundary Strength in French. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2014. Dublin, Mai 2014.Google Scholar
Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth, Brechtje Post, Mathieu Avanzi, Caroline Buthke, Albert Di Cristo, Ingo Feldhausen, Sun-Ah Jun, Philippe Martin, Trudel Meisenburg, Annie Rialland, Rafèu Sichel-Bazin, and Hiyon Yoo
2015 “Intonational phonology of French: Developing a ToBI system for French”. In Intonation in Romance, ed. by Sonia Frota, and Pilar Prieto, 63–100, Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delattre, Pierre
1966 “Les 10 intonations de base du français [the ten basic intonations in French].” French Review 40/91:1–14.Google Scholar
Di Cristo, Albert
2016Les musiques du français contemporain: Essais sur l’accentuation, la métrique, le rythme, le phrasé prosodique et l’intonation du français contemporain. Berlin/ Boston: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Di Cristo, Albert, and Ludovic Jankowski
1999 “Prosodic organization and phrasing after focus in French.” In Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), San Francisco, USA, 1565–1568.Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline
2001 “Focus and phrasing in French.” In Audiatur Vox Sapientiae. A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, ed. by Caroline Féry, and Werner Sternefeld, 153–181. Berlin: Akademie-VerlagGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Jean-Philippe
2011 “EasyAlign: an automatic phonetic alignment tool under Praat.” In Proceedings of INTERSPEECH 2011, Florence, Italy, August 27–31, ISCA Archive, http://​www​.isca​-speech​.org​/archive​/interspeech​_2011
Hamblin, Charles L.
1973Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10: 41–53.Google Scholar
Han, Chung-Hye, and Maribel Romero
2004 “Disjunction, Focus, and Scope.” Linguistic Inquiry 35.2: 179–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Philippe
1975a “Analyse phonologique de la phrase française.” Linguistics, 146.35–67.Google Scholar
1975b “Une grammaire de l’intonation de la phrase française”. Rapport d’Activité de l’institut de phonétique 9/1 et 9/2. 97–126 dans 9/1 et 77–96 dans 9/2. Institut de Phonétique: Université Libre de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Michalsky, Jan
2014 “Scaling of final rises in German questions and statements”. In Proceedings of the 7th Speech Prosody Conference, Dublin, Ireland: 978–982.Google Scholar
Michelas, Amandine, and Mariapaola D’Imperio
2010 “Durational Cues and Prosodic Phrasing in French: Evidence for the Intermediate Phrase”. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010, Chicago, http://​speechprosody2010​.illinois​.edu​/papers​/100881​.pdf
Petrone, Caterina, and Mariapaola D’Imperio
2011 “From tones to tunes: Effects of the F0 prenuclear region in the perception of Neapolitan statements and questions”. In Sonia Frota, Gorka Elordieta, and Pilar Prieto (Eds.), Prosodic categories: Production, perception and comprehension (pp. 207–230). Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petrone, Caterina, and Oliver Niebuhr
2014 “On the intonation of German intonation questions: the role of the prenuclear region”. Language Speech 57 (1): 105–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pruitt, Kathryn
2008 “Mapping prosody to interpretation in alternative questions”. Poster presented at the 21st CUNY conference on human sentence processing. https://​drive​.google​.com​/open​?id​=0Byr4N94S79X7TTE5NUtxSjd1amc
Pruitt, Kathryn, and Floris Roelofsen
2013 “The interpretation of prosody in disjunctive questions.” Linguistic Inquiry 44(4): 632–650. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Mario, Daniel Hirst, and Albert Di Cristo
1981 “Continuation et question.” In l’intonation: De l’Acoustique à la Sémantique, ed. by Mario Rossi, Albert Di Cristo, Daniel Hirst, Philippe Martin, and Yukihiro Nishinuma, 149–177, Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth
2011 “The Syntax-Phonology Interface.” In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, Second Edition, ed. by John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle, and Alan Yu, Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torreira, Francisco, and Emma Valtersson
2015 “Phonetic and visual cues to questionhood in French conversation. Phonetica 72: 20–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert
2013 “An Analysis of prosodic F-effects in interrogatives: Prosody, syntax and semantics.” Lingua 124: 131–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Heuven, Vincent J., and Judith Haan
2002 “Temporal distribution of interrogativity markers in Dutch: A perceptual study”. In Carlos Gussenhoven, and Natasha Warner (Eds.), Laboratory phonology 7 (pp. 61–86). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vion, Monique, and Annie Colas
2006 “Pitch cues for the recognition of yes-no questions in French”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35: 427–445. CrossrefGoogle Scholar